Cloud9 vs. Luminosity | Champions Tour North America Stage 2: Challengers | Group Stage | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
curry C9	1.17 1.39 0.94	208 198 219	17 8 9	/ 17 5 12 /	8 4 4	0 +3 -3	67% 75% 58%	141 135 147	40% 36% 42%	2 1 1	1 0 1	+1 +1 0
leaf C9	1.16 1.29 1.03	245 266 225	23 12 11	/ 19 8 11 /	2 0 2	+4 +4 0	67% 75% 58%	159 171 147	38% 50% 30%	4 2 2	3 0 3	+1 +2 -1
mitch C9	0.97 0.84 1.10	204 165 243	16 7 9	/ 18 9 9 /	10 4 6	-2 -2 0	71% 58% 83%	132 119 145	21% 26% 19%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
vanity C9	0.69 0.94 0.45	184 258 110	13 10 3	/ 20 10 10 /	7 2 5	-7 0 -7	71% 67% 75%	121 164 77	13% 18% 4%	1 0 1	2 2 0	-1 -2 +1
Xeppaa C9	0.32 0.21 0.43	111 105 118	8 4 4	/ 21 11 10 /	4 2 2	-13 -7 -6	54% 58% 50%	77 71 84	10% 5% 14%	3 2 1	6 4 2	-3 -2 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

curry

1.17 1.39 0.94

208 198 219

17 8 9

/ 17 5 12 /

8 4 4

0 +3 -3

67% 75% 58%

141 135 147

40% 36% 42%

2 1 1

1 0 1

+1 +1 0

leaf

1.16 1.29 1.03

245 266 225

23 12 11

/ 19 8 11 /

2 0 2

+4 +4 0

67% 75% 58%

159 171 147

38% 50% 30%

4 2 2

3 0 3

+1 +2 -1

mitch

0.97 0.84 1.10

204 165 243

16 7 9

/ 18 9 9 /

10 4 6

-2 -2 0

71% 58% 83%

132 119 145

21% 26% 19%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

vanity

0.69 0.94 0.45

184 258 110

13 10 3

/ 20 10 10 /

7 2 5

-7 0 -7

71% 67% 75%

121 164 77

13% 18% 4%

1 0 1

2 2 0

-1 -2 +1

Xeppaa

0.32 0.21 0.43

111 105 118

8 4 4

/ 21 11 10 /

4 2 2

-13 -7 -6

54% 58% 50%

77 71 84

10% 5% 14%

3 2 1

6 4 2

-3 -2 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
dazzLe LG	1.52 1.08 1.95	260 176 345	24 8 16	/ 12 6 6 /	5 3 2	+12 +2 +10	79% 58% 100%	171 119 224	24% 37% 20%	2 1 1	1 1 0	+1 0 +1
moose LG	1.25 1.95 0.56	251 365 138	21 17 4	/ 16 6 10 /	12 5 7	+5 +11 -6	79% 92% 67%	163 220 106	14% 16% 12%	1 1 0	2 0 2	-1 +1 -2
mada LG	1.15 1.30 1.01	231 246 217	20 11 9	/ 16 7 9 /	7 2 5	+4 +4 0	71% 67% 75%	132 153 112	14% 21% 8%	3 2 1	4 2 2	-1 0 -1
bdog LG	1.05 1.16 0.93	226 294 158	18 11 7	/ 17 9 8 /	5 4 1	+1 +2 -1	79% 92% 67%	146 200 92	29% 29% 30%	5 2 3	0 0 0	+5 +2 +3
TiGG LG	0.70 0.59 0.80	135 126 145	12 6 6	/ 16 8 8 /	7 5 2	-4 -2 -2	83% 83% 83%	84 77 91	8% 10% 7%	2 0 2	4 3 1	-2 -3 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

dazzLe

1.52 1.08 1.95

260 176 345

24 8 16

/ 12 6 6 /

5 3 2

+12 +2 +10

79% 58% 100%

171 119 224

24% 37% 20%

2 1 1

1 1 0

+1 0 +1

moose

1.25 1.95 0.56

251 365 138

21 17 4

/ 16 6 10 /

12 5 7

+5 +11 -6

79% 92% 67%

163 220 106

14% 16% 12%

1 1 0

2 0 2

-1 +1 -2

mada

1.15 1.30 1.01

231 246 217

20 11 9

/ 16 7 9 /

7 2 5

+4 +4 0

71% 67% 75%

132 153 112

14% 21% 8%

3 2 1

4 2 2

-1 0 -1

bdog

1.05 1.16 0.93

226 294 158

18 11 7

/ 17 9 8 /

5 4 1

+1 +2 -1

79% 92% 67%

146 200 92

29% 29% 30%

5 2 3

0 0 0

+5 +2 +3

TiGG

0.70 0.59 0.80

135 126 145

12 6 6

/ 16 8 8 /

7 5 2

-4 -2 -2

83% 83% 83%

84 77 91

8% 10% 7%

2 0 2

4 3 1

-2 -3 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
leaf C9	1.35 0.64 1.01	234 283 181	38 24 14	/ 37 16 21 /	8 4 4	+1 +8 -7	70% 83% 55%	150 177 120	29% 31% 26%	8 4 4	7 3 4	+1 +1 0
curry C9	0.98 0.88 0.93	174 152 201	26 12 14	/ 34 14 20 /	16 9 7	-8 -2 -6	65% 67% 64%	120 107 133	30% 30% 31%	4 2 2	5 3 2	-1 -1 0
mitch C9	0.74 1.08 0.90	182 130 241	27 10 17	/ 34 16 18 /	20 11 9	-7 -6 -1	80% 71% 91%	114 88 143	20% 21% 20%	4 1 3	1 1 0	+3 0 +3
vanity C9	1.04 0.73 0.89	220 254 180	33 21 12	/ 38 18 20 /	13 5 8	-5 +3 -8	72% 63% 82%	137 161 110	10% 15% 3%	3 1 2	2 2 0	+1 -1 +2
Xeppaa C9	0.80 0.57 0.69	152 160 140	23 14 9	/ 36 18 18 /	10 5 5	-13 -4 -9	59% 63% 55%	107 109 105	18% 20% 16%	5 3 2	7 4 3	-2 -1 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

leaf

1.35 0.64 1.01

234 283 181

38 24 14

/ 37 16 21 /

8 4 4

+1 +8 -7

70% 83% 55%

150 177 120

29% 31% 26%

8 4 4

7 3 4

+1 +1 0

curry

0.98 0.88 0.93

174 152 201

26 12 14

/ 34 14 20 /

16 9 7

-8 -2 -6

65% 67% 64%

120 107 133

30% 30% 31%

4 2 2

5 3 2

-1 -1 0

mitch

0.74 1.08 0.90

182 130 241

27 10 17

/ 34 16 18 /

20 11 9

-7 -6 -1

80% 71% 91%

114 88 143

20% 21% 20%

4 1 3

1 1 0

+3 0 +3

vanity

1.04 0.73 0.89

220 254 180

33 21 12

/ 38 18 20 /

13 5 8

-5 +3 -8

72% 63% 82%

137 161 110

10% 15% 3%

3 1 2

2 2 0

+1 -1 +2

Xeppaa

0.80 0.57 0.69

152 160 140

23 14 9

/ 36 18 18 /

10 5 5

-13 -4 -9

59% 63% 55%

107 109 105

18% 20% 16%

5 3 2

7 4 3

-2 -1 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
dazzLe LG	1.01 1.36 1.19	214 190 239	36 15 21	/ 27 13 14 /	13 10 3	+9 +2 +7	74% 73% 75%	141 116 163	25% 26% 24%	4 1 3	4 4 0	0 -3 +3
moose LG	1.72 0.65 1.16	224 288 168	34 25 9	/ 30 10 20 /	23 10 13	+4 +15 -11	80% 91% 71%	153 179 130	17% 20% 14%	3 1 2	6 2 4	-3 -1 -2
TiGG LG	1.01 1.27 1.15	216 181 243	36 15 21	/ 27 13 14 /	14 12 2	+9 +2 +7	87% 91% 83%	136 130 142	22% 23% 21%	4 0 4	5 3 2	-1 -3 +2
bdog LG	1.36 0.96 1.15	219 283 161	39 24 15	/ 29 14 15 /	7 5 2	+10 +10 0	78% 91% 67%	136 182 94	28% 29% 26%	7 4 3	1 1 0	+6 +3 +3
mada LG	1.21 0.85 1.02	219 267 177	34 20 14	/ 35 17 18 /	21 11 10	-1 +3 -4	74% 82% 67%	144 179 112	15% 17% 12%	4 3 1	8 3 5	-4 0 -4

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

dazzLe

1.01 1.36 1.19

214 190 239

36 15 21

/ 27 13 14 /

13 10 3

+9 +2 +7

74% 73% 75%

141 116 163

25% 26% 24%

4 1 3

4 4 0

0 -3 +3

moose

1.72 0.65 1.16

224 288 168

34 25 9

/ 30 10 20 /

23 10 13

+4 +15 -11

80% 91% 71%

153 179 130

17% 20% 14%

3 1 2

6 2 4

-3 -1 -2

TiGG

1.01 1.27 1.15

216 181 243

36 15 21

/ 27 13 14 /

14 12 2

+9 +2 +7

87% 91% 83%

136 130 142

22% 23% 21%

4 0 4

5 3 2

-1 -3 +2

bdog

1.36 0.96 1.15

219 283 161

39 24 15

/ 29 14 15 /

7 5 2

+10 +10 0

78% 91% 67%

136 182 94

28% 29% 26%

7 4 3

1 1 0

+6 +3 +3

mada

1.21 0.85 1.02

219 267 177

34 20 14

/ 35 17 18 /

21 11 10

-1 +3 -4

74% 82% 67%

144 179 112

15% 17% 12%

4 3 1

8 3 5

-4 0 -4

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
vanity C9	1.11 1.14 1.07	256 249 264	20 11 9	/ 18 8 10 /	6 3 3	+2 +3 -1	73% 58% 90%	155 159 150	8% 13% 3%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1
Xeppaa C9	1.09 1.38 0.74	192 215 166	15 10 5	/ 15 7 8 /	6 3 3	0 +3 -3	64% 67% 60%	139 146 130	24% 31% 17%	2 1 1	1 0 1	+1 +1 0
leaf C9	0.86 1.42 0.19	222 300 129	15 12 3	/ 18 8 10 /	6 4 2	-3 +4 -7	73% 92% 50%	140 183 88	22% 22% 20%	4 2 2	4 3 1	0 -1 +1
mitch C9	0.82 0.64 1.05	160 95 238	11 3 8	/ 16 7 9 /	10 7 3	-5 -4 -1	91% 83% 100%	95 58 140	19% 16% 21%	3 1 2	0 0 0	+3 +1 +2
curry C9	0.68 0.56 0.81	139 106 180	9 4 5	/ 17 9 8 /	8 5 3	-8 -5 -3	64% 58% 70%	96 80 116	20% 22% 17%	2 1 1	4 3 1	-2 -2 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

vanity

1.11 1.14 1.07

256 249 264

20 11 9

/ 18 8 10 /

6 3 3

+2 +3 -1

73% 58% 90%

155 159 150

8% 13% 3%

2 1 1

0 0 0

+2 +1 +1

Xeppaa

1.09 1.38 0.74

192 215 166

15 10 5

/ 15 7 8 /

6 3 3

0 +3 -3

64% 67% 60%

139 146 130

24% 31% 17%

2 1 1

1 0 1

+1 +1 0

leaf

0.86 1.42 0.19

222 300 129

15 12 3

/ 18 8 10 /

6 4 2

-3 +4 -7

73% 92% 50%

140 183 88

22% 22% 20%

4 2 2

4 3 1

0 -1 +1

mitch

0.82 0.64 1.05

160 95 238

11 3 8

/ 16 7 9 /

10 7 3

-5 -4 -1

91% 83% 100%

95 58 140

19% 16% 21%

3 1 2

0 0 0

+3 +1 +2

curry

0.68 0.56 0.81

139 106 180

9 4 5

/ 17 9 8 /

8 5 3

-8 -5 -3

64% 58% 70%

96 80 116

20% 22% 17%

2 1 1

4 3 1

-2 -2 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
TiGG LG	1.64 1.51 1.75	297 246 341	24 9 15	/ 11 5 6 /	7 7 0	+13 +4 +9	91% 100% 83%	194 194 193	35% 33% 36%	2 0 2	1 0 1	+1 0 +1
bdog LG	1.27 1.60 0.99	211 269 164	21 13 8	/ 12 5 7 /	2 1 1	+9 +8 +1	77% 90% 67%	125 161 95	26% 28% 22%	2 2 0	1 1 0	+1 +1 0
moose LG	1.06 1.45 0.74	196 195 197	13 8 5	/ 14 4 10 /	11 5 6	-1 +4 -5	82% 90% 75%	143 130 153	20% 27% 16%	2 0 2	4 2 2	-2 -2 0
mada LG	0.87 1.10 0.68	207 291 137	14 9 5	/ 19 10 9 /	14 9 5	-5 -1 -4	77% 100% 58%	157 211 112	15% 14% 17%	1 1 0	4 1 3	-3 0 -3
dazzLe LG	0.83 0.92 0.77	167 207 134	12 7 5	/ 15 7 8 /	8 7 1	-3 0 -3	68% 90% 50%	107 113 102	25% 15% 38%	2 0 2	3 3 0	-1 -3 +2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

TiGG

1.64 1.51 1.75

297 246 341

24 9 15

/ 11 5 6 /

7 7 0

+13 +4 +9

91% 100% 83%

194 194 193

35% 33% 36%

2 0 2

1 0 1

+1 0 +1

bdog

1.27 1.60 0.99

211 269 164

21 13 8

/ 12 5 7 /

2 1 1

+9 +8 +1

77% 90% 67%

125 161 95

26% 28% 22%

2 2 0

1 1 0

+1 +1 0

moose

1.06 1.45 0.74

196 195 197

13 8 5

/ 14 4 10 /

11 5 6

-1 +4 -5

82% 90% 75%

143 130 153

20% 27% 16%

2 0 2

4 2 2

-2 -2 0

mada

0.87 1.10 0.68

207 291 137

14 9 5

/ 19 10 9 /

14 9 5

-5 -1 -4

77% 100% 58%

157 211 112

15% 14% 17%

1 1 0

4 1 3

-3 0 -3

dazzLe

0.83 0.92 0.77

167 207 134

12 7 5

/ 15 7 8 /

8 7 1

-3 0 -3

68% 90% 50%

107 113 102

25% 15% 38%

2 0 2

3 3 0

-1 -3 +2

#16

choso_senpai

Frags

–

Clown9 2-1

#17

flowerpollendck

Frags

–

LG 2-0 C9

#18

backcore123

Frags

–

yep you're right

#58

flowerpollendck

Frags

–

lg has always been such a cool team to watch so it felt good to see this result

#19

n1kkobami

Frags

–

LG keeps on losing rounds with advantage. Wtf. Now 11 - 10

#20

n1kkobami

-1

Frags

–

Now 11 - 11... Whew. NA BS valorant

#21

n1kkobami

Frags

–

Finally closed the 1st map.

#22

KoreanOverlord

Frags

–

C9's new ceiling: top 8 team

#23

Razvizuha

Frags

–

why is the game like 3 rounds in before the stream starts?

#24

Wateruga1

-2

Frags

–

To avoid players and coaches from stream sniping

#33

Mortadelo

Frags

–

Have you ever heard of Stream delay lool

#25

bloodysky

Frags

–

Xeppa looking cold with 8 frags during the first map

#26

hardstuckimmortal

Frags

–

curry the same useless dog he was in csgo haha

#28

n1kkobami

Frags

–

He played csgo? :O

#27

sync502

Frags

–

It's not about who's a better player, we did have good chemistry and his english is good but under pressure it breaks down, we sadly hit our ceiling due to these issues and it's 100% not his fault. It's just how it is communicating in a different language
k

#29

Neon74

Frags

–

What happened to Cloud9 man :( This hurts to watch
They haven't been the same since they lost to OpTic 1-2 in the Iceland qualifier

#35

brobeans

Frags

–

if it isn't obvious, team changes mid VCT do not work out lol. they just need practice and time. same idea for when Sen got Rawkus and people were bewildered they didn't win the next game :/

#30

KoreanOverlord

Frags

–

#43

LouBag

Frags

–

Famous last words

#31

ncijk3131

Frags

–

YESSIR

#34

kristof

Frags

–

c9 officially tier 2 now.

#36

egirl84yearoldrussianman

Frags

–

What a crazy game... C9 making a lot of bad calls. I don't think they're a bad team, but I don't think that was a good performance. I'm sure they'll come back tho. LG played very well. They're super entertaining to watch so hopefully they make it to Copenhagen

#37

Kepin

Frags

–

Yeah -xeta -autumn ruined them. Sad.

#38

andrewdamf

Frags

–

lol its funny how the two worst ones in the first map destroyed in the 2nd and then the ones who destroyed in the first map were the worst ones in the 2nd map, and mada was in the middle

#40

SigmaMale

Frags

–

Wow both my favorites in Challengers 1 (V1, C9) are washed

#41

SourceAvocado

Frags

–

Praying For C9 Downfall 🙏
After what they did to my boy Xeta.

#45

Cyphics

Frags

–

Xeta left the team of his own will dude c9 didn't cut him.

#46

KoreanOverlord

Frags

–

#51

Cyphics

Frags

–

"Xeta and Autumn have been wonderful to work with but in the end they were ready for a new challenge and I've always supported these requests by players and coaches when possible.

The entire team and myself wish them well."

-Jack

#52

KoreanOverlord

Frags

–

no one believes that PR bs

#53

jimjam789

Frags

–

obviously the ceo would say that to create a better brand image. "It's not about who's a better player, we did have good chemistry and his english is good but under pressure it breaks down, we sadly hit our ceiling due to these issues and it's 100% not his fault. It's just how it is communicating in a different language" is from vanity himself

#54

Cyphics

Frags

–

Why would they trade both a coach and a one of their most consistent players for curry im the middle of vct groups? It was obviously a trade demand. It wasn't really corporate speech either it was like three sentences in a reddit thread.

#55

jimjam789

Frags

–

that arguement doesnt work because it doesnt make sense for xeta either. why would he 'request a trade' in the middle of the season, which means he is only able to play a single game in for the rest of the entire year? why after stage 1 na challengers ended or why not wait until stage 2 ends?

#56

Cyphics

Frags

–

Thats a good point actually, its just weird since they both went and its clearly a losing trade for c9, will never know whats going on behind the scene all they've really given us is a bunch of conflicting statements

#57

Cyphics

Frags

–

My best guess would be that there was a trade request but the trade was impossible during qualifiers since all the teams were busy competing so they waited till other tier 1 and 2 teams were eliminated to actually carry through with the trade? It just dosent make any sense for autumn to be included in the package theres got to be more to it than just communication handicaps.

#49

anx

Frags

–

LG can't get more balanced than this. 10 ACS difference across the team