SEN 3:0
sinatraaa MVP
Split overhaul patch
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
231 149 | 39 17 22 | / 47 18 29 / | 13 6 7 | -8 -1 -7 | 138 92 | 18% 21% 17% | 8 4 4 | 8 2 6 | 0 +2 -2 | |||
|
186 138 | 35 11 24 | / 44 17 27 / | 12 5 7 | -9 -6 -3 | 119 80 | 25% 19% 28% | 1 0 1 | 5 1 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
185 117 | 33 12 21 | / 44 17 27 / | 8 4 4 | -11 -5 -6 | 124 73 | 24% 22% 25% | 3 1 2 | 10 2 8 | -7 -1 -6 | |||
|
169 107 | 29 11 18 | / 46 19 27 / | 11 4 7 | -17 -8 -9 | 108 65 | 18% 26% 14% | 5 3 2 | 8 5 3 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
142 82 | 25 11 14 | / 42 17 25 / | 11 5 6 | -17 -6 -11 | 98 56 | 27% 29% 26% | 0 0 0 | 6 1 5 | -6 -1 -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
290 122 | 55 33 22 | / 39 24 15 / | 14 6 8 | +16 +9 +7 | 175 58 | 13% 18% 5% | 13 11 2 | 6 2 4 | +7 +9 -2 | |||
|
267 97 | 52 34 18 | / 31 20 11 / | 12 6 6 | +21 +14 +7 | 145 52 | 18% 15% 24% | 7 5 2 | 2 2 0 | +5 +3 +2 | |||
|
222 92 | 44 25 19 | / 32 20 12 / | 15 12 3 | +12 +5 +7 | 143 55 | 26% 26% 26% | 8 4 4 | 3 0 3 | +5 +4 +1 | |||
|
222 86 | 44 29 15 | / 31 16 15 / | 13 6 7 | +13 +13 0 | 129 44 | 22% 21% 24% | 7 3 4 | 2 1 1 | +5 +2 +3 | |||
|
143 72 | 28 14 14 | / 28 19 9 / | 20 14 6 | 0 -5 +5 | 91 38 | 26% 19% 38% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
285 249 | 15 3 12 | / 15 4 11 / | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | 160 140 | 19% 9% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
163 117 | 10 3 7 | / 13 4 9 / | 1 0 1 | -3 -1 -2 | 112 79 | 26% 17% 32% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |||
|
151 126 | 6 1 5 | / 13 4 9 / | 6 1 5 | -7 -3 -4 | 106 87 | 18% 10% 21% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
108 99 | 4 0 4 | / 15 4 11 / | 2 1 1 | -11 -4 -7 | 83 73 | 24% 20% 25% | 1 0 1 | 6 1 5 | -5 -1 -4 | |||
|
105 78 | 4 1 3 | / 14 4 10 / | 1 1 0 | -10 -3 -7 | 77 53 | 7% 15% 4% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
300 152 | 17 8 9 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 2 2 | +5 -1 +6 | 159 43 | 11% 15% 4% | 5 4 1 | 2 1 1 | +3 +3 0 | |||
|
289 19 | 16 15 1 | / 8 7 1 / | 2 1 1 | +8 +8 0 | 168 15 | 14% 15% 13% | 4 4 0 | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | |||
|
287 76 | 19 14 5 | / 3 2 1 / | 3 1 2 | +16 +12 +4 | 171 33 | 25% 27% 20% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
187 44 | 10 8 2 | / 8 6 2 / | 8 6 2 | +2 +2 0 | 132 32 | 34% 24% 83% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
122 40 | 8 5 3 | / 8 7 1 / | 7 6 1 | 0 -2 +2 | 78 25 | 19% 15% 27% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
234 108 | 15 8 7 | / 19 10 9 / | 6 1 5 | -4 -2 -2 | 132 57 | 21% 29% 15% | 5 3 2 | 3 1 2 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
215 69 | 15 10 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 2 3 | -1 +2 -3 | 137 42 | 24% 23% 25% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |||
|
212 121 | 18 8 10 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 3 1 | +2 0 +2 | 135 64 | 23% 24% 22% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
185 75 | 12 8 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 9 4 5 | -3 -1 -2 | 136 58 | 22% 28% 13% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
150 49 | 9 6 3 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 3 3 | -5 -2 -3 | 101 32 | 22% 27% 14% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
277 186 | 22 7 15 | / 13 6 7 / | 1 0 1 | +9 +1 +8 | 166 108 | 25% 42% 18% | 5 2 3 | 2 0 2 | +3 +2 +1 | |||
|
254 119 | 17 11 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 5 1 4 | +2 +5 -3 | 173 81 | 9% 10% 7% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 | |||
|
188 120 | 15 7 8 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 2 4 | +1 +1 0 | 112 74 | 14% 5% 21% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
180 110 | 14 7 7 | / 16 6 10 / | 4 2 2 | -2 +1 -3 | 93 56 | 19% 15% 22% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
164 106 | 12 5 7 | / 11 5 6 / | 7 5 2 | +1 0 +1 | 98 51 | 30% 22% 43% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
231 193 | 14 2 12 | / 13 5 8 / | 1 1 0 | +1 -3 +4 | 146 110 | 23% 18% 26% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
224 146 | 12 6 6 | / 17 5 12 / | 1 0 1 | -5 +1 -6 | 121 89 | 14% 14% 14% | 5 2 3 | 4 1 3 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
194 171 | 11 2 9 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 1 1 | -4 -3 -1 | 111 91 | 38% 14% 47% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
167 132 | 10 2 8 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 2 2 | -3 -3 0 | 108 86 | 27% 33% 25% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |||
|
112 89 | 6 2 4 | / 15 5 10 / | 4 2 2 | -9 -3 -6 | 80 63 | 38% 75% 29% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
324 142 | 21 12 9 | / 9 7 2 / | 4 3 1 | +12 +5 +7 | 165 61 | 25% 21% 35% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
315 99 | 21 14 7 | / 12 9 3 / | 5 3 2 | +9 +5 +4 | 192 46 | 20% 33% 3% | 4 4 0 | 3 1 2 | +1 +3 -2 | |||
|
203 20 | 12 10 2 | / 11 8 3 / | 6 6 0 | +1 +2 -1 | 126 10 | 19% 18% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
200 64 | 11 8 3 | / 12 8 4 / | 6 3 3 | -1 0 -1 | 133 39 | 22% 18% 29% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
142 61 | 8 4 4 | / 9 7 2 / | 6 3 3 | -1 -3 +2 | 96 33 | 27% 21% 44% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
RED_DIESEL [#6]wtf is this dumb format
Don't get me wrong this has been a bad formatted tournament but the map advantage is logical. Most times when there's double elimination and a losers bracket, the winner has to play 1 map down since they already lost once. It would be unfair to IMT if they didn't have some advantage since they haven't lost but if they do lose, they are done.
Fat_Lard [#9]Don't get me wrong this has been a bad formatted tournament but the map advantage is logical. Most times when there's double elimination and a losers bracket, the winner has to play 1 map down since they already lost once. It would be unfair to IMT if they didn't have some advantage since they haven't lost but if they do lose, they are done.
valorantesports website doesn't show 1-0 start, i'm thinking bracket reset
arnav [#10]valorantesports website doesn't show 1-0 start, i'm thinking bracket reset
nvm confirmed from NSG map advantage
First_Man_On_Mars [#13]stupid map advantage grand finals Zzzzzzzzz
What is stupid about the map advantage?
Fat_Lard [#14]What is stupid about the map advantage?
i think map advantage usually make sense, but i like it more when there's a bracket reset because it rewards the lower bracket team for going through a tougher run. also usually if the upper bracket team is fundamentally better, they should win even without map advantage. a full bo5 is just more fun is all
First_Man_On_Mars [#16]everything?
How? IMT hasn't lost once this entire tournament, SEN has. Why should IMT not get any advantage even though if they lose once, they are done while every other team got a second chance?
Fat_Lard [#19]How? IMT hasn't lost once this entire tournament, SEN has. Why should IMT not get any advantage even though if they lose once, they are done while every other team got a second chance?
there are other ways of creating an advantage without killing the grand finals
First_Man_On_Mars [#21]there are other ways of creating an advantage without killing the grand finals
How does a 1 map advantage kill the grand finals, which by the way doesn't really matter since both teams already qualified for the main event of the next tournament? What else would they do? A bracket reset? No way any team would want to play back to back BO5s against the same team. So what else could they do? A map advantage is the best option.
Triangulum [#20]SEN 3-1
They're just too dominant. As long as Zombs doesn't bottom frag too hard and Kehmicals doesn't go absolutely insane, I think Sen has this in the bag.
GG, managed to guess correctly!
Youngztar [#28]I always say that sentinels are the best team in NA and people just hate or dont believe it, to be honest, I dont support any team especifically, only players, but sentinels are one of my favorites, just because I saw them rise and still get there for a long time
on top of that, sick, shahzam and sinatraa are just some of the best at what they do. just amazing watching generational talent
arnav [#29]on top of that, sick, shahzam and sinatraa are just some of the best at what they do. just amazing watching generational talent
bro dapr is the most entertain player ever and an amazing shot on that as well and zombs is not even that bad in fact he not even bad at all like yeah he just get's scapegoated mostly for sentinels throws.
Fat_Lard [#33]If Sen loses this everyone would be talking about how this game didn't matter... because it really didn't. IMT, LG, Sen and XSET all already qualified for the main event of the next VCT so why did they even play these games?
The seedings matches in the open qualifier didnt give money, but in this closed they give more money to the winner
Fat_Lard [#9]Don't get me wrong this has been a bad formatted tournament but the map advantage is logical. Most times when there's double elimination and a losers bracket, the winner has to play 1 map down since they already lost once. It would be unfair to IMT if they didn't have some advantage since they haven't lost but if they do lose, they are done.
why was it bad formated
Fat_Lard [#9]Don't get me wrong this has been a bad formatted tournament but the map advantage is logical. Most times when there's double elimination and a losers bracket, the winner has to play 1 map down since they already lost once. It would be unfair to IMT if they didn't have some advantage since they haven't lost but if they do lose, they are done.
map advantage is a must
but i think that BO5 was really way too much
im ok with BO5 for a worlds finals... but not for a qualifier
and BO5 also takes a bit of the edge out of staying in upper bracket, coz u still need to win 2 maps in a BO5 finals, rather just 1 map in a BO3
Tyranitar [#32]bro dapr is the most entertain player ever and an amazing shot on that as well and zombs is not even that bad in fact he not even bad at all like yeah he just get's scapegoated mostly for sentinels throws.
never said they weren't good, i'm a huge fan of all 5 of them. i still think sick, shahzam and sinatraa are generational talents though, there's a difference.
Fat_Lard [#33]If Sen loses this everyone would be talking about how this game didn't matter... because it really didn't. IMT, LG, Sen and XSET all already qualified for the main event of the next VCT so why did they even play these games?
yo fat Lard when did you become a sen hater all of a sudden like bro because only three of the five are from csgo and the main guy everybody looks at is the one not from csgo. like bro everybody makes excuses for every big teams loss remember when tsm lost to against sen earlier in 2020 in the showing that put sen on the map like people shat on them for dig match too people made excuse that they weren't even trying like when 100t got fucked in the last two tourn they still a top 3 team just unlucky but others say it was fluke and others say their loss was a fluke. and too say a tourn doesn't even matter spits in the face of teams that tried there fucking best to win and the tourn for money bro wtf i'm disappointed in you bro with your four star account.
Tyranitar [#38]yo fat Lard when did you become a sen hater all of a sudden like bro because only three of the five are from csgo and the main guy everybody looks at is the one not from csgo. like bro everybody makes excuses for every big teams loss remember when tsm lost to against sen earlier in 2020 in the showing that put sen on the map like people shat on them for dig match too people made excuse that they weren't even trying like when 100t got fucked in the last two tourn they still a top 3 team just unlucky but others say it was fluke and others say their loss was a fluke. and too say a tourn doesn't even matter spits in the face of teams that tried there fucking best to win and the tourn for money bro wtf i'm disappointed in you bro with your four star account.
Sen hater? Every time Sen loses in one of these matches they come up with excuses and say they weren't trying, saying that doesn't make me a Sen hater. Honestly I didn't even notice the prize pool so I take back what I said about it not mattering. However, I still think you should take this game with a grain of salt because teams weren't playing in this for the money, they were playing to qualify but it's still a good win from Sen against one of the hottest teams right now.
Fat_Lard [#39]Sen hater? Every time Sen loses in one of these matches they come up with excuses and say they weren't trying, saying that doesn't make me a Sen hater. Honestly I didn't even notice the prize pool so I take back what I said about it not mattering. However, I still think you should take this game with a grain of salt because teams weren't playing in this for the money, they were playing to qualify but it's still a good win from Sen against one of the hottest teams right now.
bro every great team HAS THERE FANS MAKE EXCUSES like in jbl 100t fans say there loss was a fluke or that they weren't trying, so it's not just sen. the players of sen will always try at 100% and say they did to put respect in the other teams name.
Tyranitar [#40]bro every great team HAS THERE FANS MAKE EXCUSES like in jbl 100t fans say there loss was a fluke or that they weren't trying, so it's not just sen. the players of sen will always try at 100% and say they did to put respect in the other teams name.
If you actually think they always give it there all and also don't make excuse then how come after they lost in one of the First Strike qualifiers, they tweeted about how dapr drank 9 white claws?
Fat_Lard [#41]If you actually think they always give it there all and also don't make excuse then how come after they lost in one of the First Strike qualifiers, they tweeted about how dapr drank 9 white claws?
lard you can't be this dense man plus they were never gonna win first stike because they haven't trained prior two weeks of the event (rip zams dad)but they still tried there best without being at there best. plus you gotta be trolling if you think the white claws thing is real like only braindead tsm and 100t fans (no offenses to actual competent 100t and tsm fans) believe in that shit. but if you believe that a light weight like dapr drink white claws before a game and still makes it to top 4 of the event sheeeeee, you gotta be braindead yourself.