Knights vs 100T
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.29 1.23 1.36 | 280 304 256 | 24 12 12 | / 16 10 6 / | 6 3 3 | +8 +2 +6 | 71% 67% 75% | 188 202 173 | 23% 33% 16% | 4 3 1 | 6 3 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.10 1.04 1.15 | 183 177 191 | 16 8 8 | / 13 8 5 / | 10 7 3 | +3 0 +3 | 75% 75% 75% | 129 113 144 | 29% 20% 38% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.07 0.78 1.36 | 226 173 279 | 18 7 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 4 1 3 | +1 -2 +3 | 63% 50% 75% | 153 106 200 | 33% 64% 25% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.02 1.00 1.04 | 188 175 202 | 14 6 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 6 0 | -1 -2 +1 | 83% 83% 83% | 130 133 126 | 23% 16% 28% | 5 2 3 | 1 0 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
1.01 0.71 1.31 | 181 138 226 | 18 6 12 | / 14 9 5 / | 1 0 1 | +4 -3 +7 | 63% 50% 75% | 110 90 131 | 24% 27% 22% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.47 1.19 1.75 | 304 225 384 | 27 10 17 | / 16 9 7 / | 1 0 1 | +11 +1 +10 | 67% 58% 75% | 189 159 218 | 32% 36% 29% | 2 0 2 | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.88 0.78 0.97 | 183 174 194 | 13 5 8 | / 19 11 8 / | 8 5 3 | -6 -6 0 | 63% 58% 67% | 133 126 140 | 22% 25% 20% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.84 1.15 0.54 | 176 255 99 | 14 10 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 1 0 1 | -3 +1 -4 | 63% 50% 75% | 119 177 62 | 28% 26% 31% | 3 3 0 | 2 1 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.39 0.98 | 177 121 233 | 12 4 8 | / 20 11 9 / | 3 0 3 | -8 -7 -1 | 42% 17% 67% | 115 76 155 | 30% 27% 32% | 3 1 2 | 6 3 3 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.53 0.08 0.97 | 96 53 140 | 9 2 7 | / 18 11 7 / | 2 1 1 | -9 -9 0 | 54% 33% 75% | 79 42 115 | 50% 33% 57% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.73 1.17 0.94 | 196 166 236 | 39 17 22 | / 46 27 19 / | 14 4 10 | -7 -10 +3 | 64% 59% 69% | 134 104 166 | 25% 36% 19% | 5 1 4 | 8 5 3 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.78 1.07 0.92 | 200 207 208 | 43 21 22 | / 46 28 18 / | 7 3 4 | -3 -7 +4 | 62% 53% 72% | 136 135 138 | 27% 33% 22% | 6 4 2 | 13 7 6 | -7 -3 -4 | |
|
0.70 1.12 0.90 | 161 139 193 | 37 16 21 | / 39 26 13 / | 17 9 8 | -2 -10 +8 | 64% 59% 69% | 111 84 140 | 34% 24% 43% | 2 1 1 | 8 4 4 | -6 -3 -3 | |
|
0.59 1.22 0.89 | 179 141 225 | 40 15 25 | / 43 28 15 / | 8 1 7 | -3 -13 +10 | 59% 41% 79% | 114 91 140 | 20% 19% 20% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.59 0.98 0.76 | 152 127 190 | 30 12 18 | / 45 27 18 / | 15 9 6 | -15 -15 0 | 64% 56% 72% | 108 100 117 | 25% 25% 25% | 8 3 5 | 6 4 2 | +2 -1 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.90 1.47 1.20 | 215 190 251 | 50 21 29 | / 35 23 12 / | 9 0 9 | +15 -2 +17 | 74% 62% 84% | 150 134 165 | 35% 45% 28% | 9 6 3 | 6 3 3 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.03 1.28 1.16 | 259 241 263 | 50 21 29 | / 42 23 19 / | 18 7 11 | +8 -2 +10 | 75% 66% 84% | 165 165 166 | 21% 28% 16% | 12 6 6 | 3 2 1 | +9 +4 +5 | |
|
1.05 1.22 1.14 | 217 193 228 | 43 18 25 | / 36 20 16 / | 11 5 6 | +7 -2 +9 | 61% 45% 75% | 138 124 150 | 22% 24% 20% | 5 2 3 | 8 4 4 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.85 1.31 1.09 | 189 152 218 | 38 13 25 | / 37 21 16 / | 29 11 18 | +1 -8 +9 | 77% 66% 88% | 126 107 142 | 26% 28% 26% | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.54 1.34 0.96 | 165 92 222 | 38 11 27 | / 39 22 17 / | 15 4 11 | -1 -11 +10 | 72% 59% 84% | 107 63 146 | 59% 60% 58% | 7 0 7 | 6 4 2 | +1 -4 +5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.00 0.53 1.32 | 201 123 254 | 14 3 11 | / 13 7 6 / | 4 1 3 | +1 -4 +5 | 70% 38% 92% | 128 83 157 | 20% 13% 24% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.89 0.89 | 200 214 192 | 12 5 7 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 2 4 | -3 -2 -1 | 70% 75% 67% | 140 128 148 | 13% 18% 9% | 2 0 2 | 5 2 3 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.80 0.49 1.00 | 175 132 205 | 12 3 9 | / 13 8 5 / | 5 2 3 | -1 -5 +4 | 70% 75% 67% | 125 76 157 | 40% 30% 45% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.78 0.58 0.91 | 158 149 164 | 11 4 7 | / 15 7 8 / | 1 0 1 | -4 -3 -1 | 70% 50% 83% | 104 101 105 | 38% 50% 31% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.74 0.02 1.31 | 160 49 235 | 11 1 10 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 0 6 | -4 -7 +3 | 55% 13% 83% | 96 38 134 | 26% 33% 24% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 0.97 2.02 | 314 217 459 | 20 8 12 | / 15 10 5 / | 10 4 6 | +5 -2 +7 | 85% 83% 88% | 188 139 261 | 16% 29% 7% | 5 2 3 | 1 1 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.29 0.67 2.23 | 216 85 415 | 17 4 13 | / 12 8 4 / | 5 2 3 | +5 -4 +9 | 90% 83% 100% | 141 55 270 | 73% 100% 67% | 4 0 4 | 2 2 0 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
1.23 1.51 0.83 | 188 268 70 | 13 11 2 | / 9 7 2 / | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | 70% 58% 88% | 128 181 49 | 22% 26% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.09 0.80 1.54 | 160 140 190 | 12 6 6 | / 10 8 2 / | 9 3 6 | +2 -2 +4 | 80% 67% 100% | 105 89 129 | 26% 22% 29% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.63 0.39 0.99 | 129 138 117 | 9 6 3 | / 14 12 2 / | 4 0 4 | -5 -6 +1 | 75% 58% 100% | 88 86 93 | 27% 56% 8% | 5 4 1 | 2 2 0 | +3 +2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.82 0.57 1.40 | 161 128 241 | 9 5 4 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 1 3 | -5 -6 +1 | 59% 58% 60% | 99 87 127 | 33% 45% 25% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.73 0.49 1.31 | 124 105 172 | 9 5 4 | / 13 10 3 / | 2 0 2 | -4 -5 +1 | 41% 33% 60% | 69 60 91 | 39% 27% 57% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.58 0.51 0.76 | 154 156 151 | 8 6 2 | / 16 12 4 / | 3 0 3 | -8 -6 -2 | 41% 33% 60% | 105 98 120 | 15% 19% 12% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.55 0.46 0.76 | 162 148 196 | 8 5 3 | / 15 11 4 / | 0 0 0 | -7 -6 -1 | 41% 42% 40% | 102 90 131 | 30% 26% 36% | 2 1 1 | 4 2 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.40 0.56 0.04 | 107 132 50 | 5 5 0 | / 15 11 4 / | 3 3 0 | -10 -6 -4 | 47% 58% 20% | 91 108 51 | 29% 33% 0% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.65 1.51 1.71 | 286 187 327 | 18 3 15 | / 7 2 5 / | 8 5 3 | +11 +1 +10 | 76% 80% 75% | 180 104 212 | 16% 17% 15% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.48 1.40 1.52 | 213 228 208 | 14 5 9 | / 5 2 3 / | 4 0 4 | +9 +3 +6 | 82% 80% 83% | 169 187 162 | 44% 63% 38% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.39 1.13 1.50 | 223 131 261 | 13 2 11 | / 8 2 6 / | 12 3 9 | +5 0 +5 | 94% 80% 100% | 139 107 152 | 32% 50% 29% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.34 0.86 1.54 | 287 268 296 | 16 3 13 | / 10 4 6 / | 7 3 4 | +6 -1 +7 | 82% 60% 92% | 204 201 206 | 25% 28% 23% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.19 1.33 1.13 | 184 205 175 | 12 5 7 | / 9 3 6 / | 8 1 7 | +3 +2 +1 | 76% 60% 83% | 106 132 95 | 50% 56% 46% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 |
agile2xa [#5]100T 2-1 Knights, hope it's a good game
100t best team in the world but sadly i don't think so
100T have the better roster but i think experience and practice will do better
ban > will (simply bc ban can awp better)
skuba > bang (bc of smokes exp)
asuna > xxif
derrek > genghsta
stellar > frosty
they both have good staff as well in the form of sean, mikes and ocean
hoping for a banger match, I can see 100T winning if they have have similar individual performance like they did today, winning duels will be the biggest factor
Trippzy [#16]How much did Nadeshot pay Knights to put 100T on the mainstream every single match?
well they are the biggest pull for people to watch
new 100t roster > faze, tsm, ...
bigcutepenguin [#17]well they are the biggest pull for people to watch
new 100t roster > faze, tsm, ...
yeah, I guess you're right.
Trippzy [#16]How much did Nadeshot pay Knights to put 100T on the mainstream every single match?
how much did knights pay to let them farm viewership from 100ts name
bigcutepenguin [#17]well they are the biggest pull for people to watch
new 100t roster > faze, tsm, ...
best part is hiko's watch party gets double the views of the official stream, so it's a win overall for 100t
UnEstoppable [#14]12 days of practice 100T against a VCT closed qual Knights team? I’m not holding my breath, but go 100T!
Tough task for 100T. I’d say a 2-1 loss and keeping the other 2 games close would be great for 100T. They boot camp next week and their attacks will look better for VCT.
are the seeds in top 16 randomized or something? thought knights and 100t were meant to be 1st and second seed unlucky wanted to see them in finals.
Honestly if 100t beat a vct playoff team 2 weeks into their roster that would be exceeding expectations so it would be a good sign if they at least make it a close and good game. Best growth for this roster would be to just qual by the second qualifier and just grow with the group stage like the other teams did last stage. Top 8/6 should be a realistic success cuz that means they would have pushed a couple good teams out of playoffs contention
erickwak [#26]are the seeds in top 16 randomized or something? thought knights and 100t were meant to be 1st and second seed unlucky wanted to see them in finals.
Honestly if 100t beat a vct playoff team 2 weeks into their roster that would be exceeding expectations so it would be a good sign if they at least make it a close and good game. Best growth for this roster would be to just qual by the second qualifier and just grow with the group stage like the other teams did last stage. Top 8/6 should be a realistic success cuz that means they would have pushed a couple good teams out of playoffs contention
they were either randomized or based on the Round Differential from group stage.
TwentySeven [#35]Take into consideration that 100T is a new team, we should be happy if they can even get a map off of knights
2-1 Knights
but imagine 100T actually wins 0_0
dont have to imagine, just belive have faith
AverageJoe [#36]dont have to imagine, just belive have faith
Queue Journey’s “Don’t Dtop Believin” hopium
RitzyCobalt [#41]knights are a top 10 team in NA so this is a real challenge for 100t, if they win this then it'll be super impressive.
fracture was a little painful, but 100t with 2 weeks taking a map off the 7th best team in NA
bendersbeard [#40]Knights cutting the stream after losing first half and first map because they don't want to broadcast their L
what L
trembolonaRage [#47]Those orgs should honestly buy brazilian rosters
They would pay 5~10% of NA salaries, teams are better in general than NA, brazilian fanbase is huge
when i moved from сs i thought 100t was brazilian team kek
pewpew [#50]I know they trying comps but Asuna on Breach lmao. What the fuck is this. You are making someone with the duelist mentality to go for a full support agent like Breach, not even a semi support like Viper, Sage, or something.
Ever heard of DRX stax?
pewpew [#50]I know they trying comps but Asuna on Breach lmao. What the fuck is this. You are making someone with the duelist mentality to go for a full support agent like Breach, not even a semi support like Viper, Sage, or something.
Bc that's how playing Flex works. Breach is in meta right now on most maps so they will put him on it.
TwentySeven [#35]Take into consideration that 100T is a new team, we should be happy if they can even get a map off of knights
2-1 Knights
but imagine 100T actually wins 0_0
im just a genius what can i say glad they still got a map off them tho
trembolonaRage [#47]Those orgs should honestly buy brazilian rosters
They would pay 5~10% of NA salaries, teams are better in general than NA, brazilian fanbase is huge
better teams then in NA? Where did you get this delusion from?
DELUSIONAL_SCOURGE_FAN [#49]what L
Posted this after all the technical issues on the first map because stream kept dying and Knights lost first map :)