I think it’s time. Guy can’t do anything but stare at his minimap. It’s like Fnatic are 4v5
Mdkns [#6]The fact that this is controversial shows how stupid the Val community is
Bonker and boaster are like twins. Bonker could do what boaster does if he had a good enough team. Mechanics are like the exact same between the two.
Mdkns [#7]Bonker and boaster are like twins. Bonker could do what boaster does if he had a good enough team. Mechanics are like the exact same between the two.
mechanically they are as dogshit but boaster can actually use his mouse (not very well but at least he can to do well enough in tier1)
his teams always have dogshit playstyle
literally find 30 gimmicks dont care about fundamentals and adapting DERKE GO KILL
SO GOOD IGL, according to him they were trying to improve fundamentally prior to champions but its the same shit, once their gimmicks/setplays get figured out they are tier5 team, good calling from boaster against kru, keep playing retake and flanking every round like the last 6 maps of groups while you are getting exploited by kru for it!! top igl for sure, he should try coaching/analyst and get a real igl
Too many ppl praise boaster for "crazy complicated strats". They are good for a single game but realistically they are unsustainable throughout a prolonged period of time in a tournament and simple fundamental adaptive IGLing is way more effective and sustainable. Example: redgar, nukkye
It's why we see Fnatic after prolonged periods of time in a tournament, they cant sustain those crazy complicated strats and then they crumble. Its better instead to focus on fundamentals (especially with meta changing constantly). It also doesnt help when they are playing with substitutes, its better for simple IGLing when playing with subs. And vs fast aggressive teams that dont give u time or space again simple fundamental adaptive playstyle is better.
no_noise_979 [#12]Too many ppl praise boaster for "crazy complicated strats". They are good for a single game but realistically they are unsustainable throughout a prolonged period of time in a tournament and simple fundamental adaptive IGLing is way more effective and sustainable. Example: redgar, nukkye
It's why we see Fnatic after prolonged periods of time in a tournament, they cant sustain those crazy complicated strats and then they crumble. Its better instead to focus on fundamentals (especially with meta changing constantly). It also doesnt help when they are playing with substitutes, its better for simple IGLing when playing with subs. And vs fast aggressive teams that dont give u time or space again simple fundamental adaptive playstyle is better.
everyone who doesnt agree with what you just said is probably just shit at the game/has no understanding of how tactical fps work
idkbro [#14]everyone who doesnt agree with what you just said is probably just shit at the game/has no understanding of how tactical fps work
common idkbro W
idkbro [#8]mechanically they are as dogshit but boaster can actually use his mouse (not very well but at least he can to do well enough in tier1)
100 acs is well?
archetype [#2]? L
Boaster is 7th rank player in this masters as per Sideshow top 20 list
No scream or jamppi in top 20 BTW