Steel, shahzam and Fns?
0
Top 3 igls in Na? who have proved themselves...
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
- Vanity (IGL'd 2 teams and took both to LAN. Also performed great at LAN)
- Shahz (Great IGL as well as also a great player individually in terms of mechanics compared to other IGLs)
- steel (Led 100T in a decent run at Berlin beating teams like Acend and Gambit)
- Zander (Had a 0 maps dropped run in OQ1. Unproven against tier 1 teams yet but has potential)
- FNS (Holding NV at a consistent top 3 NA for a year)
CalypsoGHC [#9]
- subroza (won faze clan invitational)
- hazed (goat)
- rossy (best up and coming igl)
Nice bait
CalypsoGHC [#9]
- subroza (won faze clan invitational)
- hazed (goat)
- rossy (best up and coming igl)
Did you just bring up a tourney from 1985?
CalypsoGHC [#15]still more relevant than akwho
Akrew would fucking dumpster faze clan invitational TSM
delusional_sentinels_fan1 [#16]Akrew would fucking dumpster faze clan invitational TSM
valorant goat cutler would take a fat dump on all these nooby zoomers no cap
dexter000111 [#7]
- Vanity (IGL'd 2 teams and took both to LAN. Also performed great at LAN)
- Shahz (Great IGL as well as also a great player individually in terms of mechanics compared to other IGLs)
- steel (Led 100T in a decent run at Berlin beating teams like Acend and Gambit)
- Zander (Had a 0 maps dropped run in OQ1. Unproven against tier 1 teams yet but has potential)
- FNS (Holding NV at a consistent top 3 NA for a year)
best list no debate
dexter000111 [#7]
- Vanity (IGL'd 2 teams and took both to LAN. Also performed great at LAN)
- Shahz (Great IGL as well as also a great player individually in terms of mechanics compared to other IGLs)
- steel (Led 100T in a decent run at Berlin beating teams like Acend and Gambit)
- Zander (Had a 0 maps dropped run in OQ1. Unproven against tier 1 teams yet but has potential)
- FNS (Holding NV at a consistent top 3 NA for a year)
dephh best igl in NA not even on ur top 5 list is crazy tho
swollencheese [#24]
- vanity (brought 2 average teams to Lan's
- steel
3.zander
4.dephh
5.fns
ok v1 was maybe average but considering zander is doing it too hampens vanity's abilities in my eyes. and c9b is in NO WAY an "average" team. xeppaa is probably the best NA flex rn, xeta is one of the best sovas NA, leaf was carrying really hard in every game, and mitch did his job
swollencheese [#24]
- vanity (brought 2 average teams to Lan's
- steel
3.zander
4.dephh
5.fns
I don't see what sets steel apart from fns, just because steel can have insane timings individually on lurks doesn't mean he's a good igl. i think we're confusing the question here. (this is coming from 100t and steel fan btw)
greedeetv [#30]have you watched any xset games?
Yes several
They had a very poor showing at LCQ last year. And we haven't seen enough gameplay from XSET in 2022 to judge them and put Dephh in top 5 IGLs (only 2 significant matches actually i.e. against NRG and The Guard)
P.S. I'd put him as 6th as of now
dexter000111 [#32]Yes several
They had a very poor showing at LCQ last year. And we haven't seen enough gameplay from XSET in 2022 to judge them and put Dephh in top 5 IGLs (only 2 significant matches actually i.e. against NRG and The Guard)
P.S. I'd put him as 6th as of now
so they lost to 100t with boi, which wasn't great but it was a close series. then they lost to the eventual winners and eventual champions quarterfinalists c9, who were in insane form. it wasn't great overall, but that has nothing to do with dephh's igling abilities. my guy never falls below 3 on the scoresheet and if you actually watch the games the midround adaptability is insane. just look at some recent examples with radiance, nrg, and the guard
greedeetv [#33]so they lost to 100t with boi, which wasn't great but it was a close series. then they lost to the eventual winners and eventual champions quarterfinalists c9, who were in insane form. it wasn't great overall, but that has nothing to do with dephh's igling abilities. my guy never falls below 3 on the scoresheet and if you actually watch the games the midround adaptability is insane. just look at some recent examples with radiance, nrg, and the guard
Yeah I agree with everything you stated which is why I agree he is a good IGL
But the other 5 that I stated had much better results so Dephh is surely below them for now
But I am willing to change my kind about it after we see some actual tier 1 action from them in closed qualifiers
dexter000111 [#7]
- Vanity (IGL'd 2 teams and took both to LAN. Also performed great at LAN)
- Shahz (Great IGL as well as also a great player individually in terms of mechanics compared to other IGLs)
- steel (Led 100T in a decent run at Berlin beating teams like Acend and Gambit)
- Zander (Had a 0 maps dropped run in OQ1. Unproven against tier 1 teams yet but has potential)
- FNS (Holding NV at a consistent top 3 NA for a year)
Would put FNS over Zander but otherwise a good list.
greedeetv [#27]ok v1 was maybe average but considering zander is doing it too hampens vanity's abilities in my eyes. and c9b is in NO WAY an "average" team. xeppaa is probably the best NA flex rn, xeta is one of the best sovas NA, leaf was carrying really hard in every game, and mitch did his job
Man. Why do people overrate xeppaa so much.
He is the weakest member of c9b.
Being incredible 60% of the time doesn’t make up for the 40% dog water. He went -21 with 11%hs in the most important series of the year.
Xeta and Mitch are underrated.
CalypsoGHC [#21]flukes don't count
agreed, tsm being dominant during 2020 was a fluke
this is the result of their real performance
dexter000111 [#7]
- Vanity (IGL'd 2 teams and took both to LAN. Also performed great at LAN)
- Shahz (Great IGL as well as also a great player individually in terms of mechanics compared to other IGLs)
- steel (Led 100T in a decent run at Berlin beating teams like Acend and Gambit)
- Zander (Had a 0 maps dropped run in OQ1. Unproven against tier 1 teams yet but has potential)
- FNS (Holding NV at a consistent top 3 NA for a year)
common dexter000111 W
nikoko07 [#39]why you hate mibr
Fake ass org that won a lot when using real players against postmen on CS 1.6, too proud and a bad fanbase, only took good players and turned them into shit, now on Valorant they got the shit players and I guess they'll be shittier
la1Ka [#46]top 3: steel, dephh, vanity
honourable mentions: rebo, zander, fns, valyn, c0m
no real order on either list
Damn no shahz ? Not even an honourable mention
delusional_sentinels_fan1 [#16]Akrew would fucking dumpster faze clan invitational TSM
what does that say about sentinels though ;)
was the op still 4600 and ridiculously broken then? and drone was still viable with phoenix. interesting hypothetical tho.
dexter000111 [#49]Damn no shahz ? Not even an honourable mention
hes just another dumb brit, dont mind him
xDillan [#51]hes just another dumb brit, dont mind him
Who is he exactly ? I thought he's a pro player
The verified mark got me
benthy_sear [#42]agreed, tsm being dominant during 2020 was a fluke
this is the result of their real performance
TSM wasn't dominant 2020, they were "dominant" for 2 months
dexter000111 [#7]
- Vanity (IGL'd 2 teams and took both to LAN. Also performed great at LAN)
- Shahz (Great IGL as well as also a great player individually in terms of mechanics compared to other IGLs)
- steel (Led 100T in a decent run at Berlin beating teams like Acend and Gambit)
- Zander (Had a 0 maps dropped run in OQ1. Unproven against tier 1 teams yet but has potential)
- FNS (Holding NV at a consistent top 3 NA for a year)
W
CalypsoGHC [#9]
- subroza (won faze clan invitational)
- hazed (goat)
- rossy (best up and coming igl)
common CalypsoGHC L
CalypsoGHC [#15]still more relevant than akwho
Netero doesn't give a damn about anything he sets as a flair or flag.
Discord