question???
Olofboost [#3]50% of present EMEA organizations will leave by 2024
The game will prosper in Brazil and APAC though, because of how much Riot licks their asses
EMEA orgs can always invest in other regions
until they stop listening to the community at all. The game won't survive if they don't care about what we want to be added/fixed in the game.
this year's Champions' slots are already decided and we can't do anything about it, we'll have to wait until the next year to see some changes. If this decision goes poorly and they do nothing about it (which would be weird) the game will eventually lose viewership. It won't die thanks to a big part of the community not caring about every aspect of the game, just as CS.
FERETON [#8]until they stop listening to the community at all. The game won't survive if they don't care about what we want to be added/fixed in the game.
this year's Champions' slots are already decided and we can't do anything about it, we'll have to wait until the next year to see some changes. If this decision goes poorly and they do nothing about it (which would be weird) the game will eventually lose viewership. It won't die thanks to a big part of the community not caring about every aspect of the game, just as CS.
mf they r the most reactive game dev in terms of responding to the community LMAO. look at valve look at blizzard look at epic. none of them make changes to the game people want
OzyMeister [#6]EMEA orgs can always invest in other regions
for example Fnatic India and TSM India (PubgM)
jimjam789 [#12]mf they r the most reactive game dev in terms of responding to the community LMAO. look at valve look at blizzard look at epic. none of them make changes to the game people want
Dude I never said they didn't listen to the community, only in this case specifically, i said that if they do nothing about this decision the game will lose a lot of viewership.
OzyMeister [#6]EMEA orgs can always invest in other regions
YES, they can.
but in emea there are a lot of very good players and that would not be fair
Belovalo [#16]YES, they can.
but in emea there are a lot of very good players and that would not be fair
I don't think they want to go the CsGo route though yes EMEA is the best region but if you give them more and more slots weaker regions and their valo scene will die inevitably just like it happened in CsGo
Slatko [#10]Look at League of Legends it's still going and it doesn't look like it's stopping, so Valorant still has a long time
U mean in EU the game and players keep rotating between Fnatic, G2 and Mad Lions only? Other orgs otherthan Vitality not invest at all? In NA it is always Cloud9, TSM and 100T? T1 always wininng worlds?
FERETON [#15]Dude I never said they didn't listen to the community, only in this case specifically, i said that if they do nothing about this decision the game will lose a lot of viewership.
actually otherwise since BR and asia is bringing in SHIT ton of views so expanding their slots to other regions would grow the game internationally. not that i agree ofc still a shit decision IMO lol
VirajKnight [#18]U mean in EU the game and players keep rotating between Fnatic, G2 and Mad Lions only? Other orgs otherthan Vitality not invest at all? In NA it is always Cloud9, TSM and 100T? T1 always wininng worlds?
Yet the game is still played and watched massively.
jimjam789 [#19]actually otherwise since BR and asia is bringing in SHIT ton of views so expanding their slots to other regions would grow the game internationally. not that i agree ofc still a shit decision IMO lol
Yeah ofc they bring a lot of views but if the regions keep playing at the same level they played the last year that viewership won't last long. Most people, specially new viewers, stop watching the events when their teams lose.
FERETON [#21]Yeah ofc they bring a lot of views but if the regions keep playing at the same level they played the last year that viewership won't last long. Most people, specially new viewers, stop watching the events when their teams lose.
according to ur logic if shit team keeps losing, people will stop watching them. but that means another team is winning which would make more people watch the good team.
jimjam789 [#22]according to ur logic if shit team keeps losing, people will stop watching them. but that means another team is winning which would make more people watch the good team.
But if the better team is from a bigger region eg: NA or EMEA the viewership will stay the same for them, while for the other team it will decrease.
FERETON [#23]But if the better team is from a bigger region eg: NA or EMEA the viewership will stay the same for them, while for the other team it will decrease.
but thats not the case. BR and JP were both terrible all year but viewership is still increasing
OzyMeister [#17]I don't think they want to go the CsGo route though yes EMEA is the best region but if you give them more and more slots weaker regions and their valo scene will die inevitably just like it happened in CsGo
ok, +1 emea -1br/latam and it's all good
jimjam789 [#24]but thats not the case. BR and JP were both terrible all year but viewership is still increasing
how could you know if the viewership from those regions will increase if the most probable thing is that it could decrease? Viewership in those regions is increasing RIGHT NOW just bc there's new orgs with good players, but if none of them qualifies for masters/champs and leave the events early it's most likely to decrease
FERETON [#27]how could you know if the viewership from those regions will increase if the most probable thing is that it could decrease? Viewership in those regions is increasing RIGHT NOW just bc there's new orgs with good players, but if none of them qualifies for masters/champs and leave the events early it's most likely to decrease
mate thats already happened. valorant is in its 3rd year its not a new game. 'new orgs with good players' this kind of phase has already happened. these 'new orgs' are no longer new. everyone is BR and JP know their region is the worst and will continue to be the worst yet the numbers are increasing. why? because as long as they like and play the actual game itself, they will always watch the esport
jimjam789 [#28]mate thats already happened. valorant is in its 3rd year its not a new game. 'new orgs with good players' this kind of phase has already happened. these 'new orgs' are no longer new. everyone is BR and JP know their region is the worst and will continue to be the worst yet the numbers are increasing. why? because as long as they like and play the actual game itself, they will always watch the esport
with new orgs i'm referring to orgs coming from other esports, new teams being picked up, massive roster shuffles. I'm basically describing what's happening mostly in BR and JP, not only in NA and EMEA. And not everybody who plays the game will instantly go watch the pro scene. In most cases they watch world finals or the orgs they like, and with that we go back to what I said before. The best thing we could do is stop discussing and watch the scene develop. The game won't die soon, but it doesn't take a lot of factors to lose viewership in a few regions.
jimjam789 [#28]mate thats already happened. valorant is in its 3rd year its not a new game. 'new orgs with good players' this kind of phase has already happened. these 'new orgs' are no longer new. everyone is BR and JP know their region is the worst and will continue to be the worst yet the numbers are increasing. why? because as long as they like and play the actual game itself, they will always watch the esport
How to say "I don't follow any esport scene from those countries" without saying "I don't follow any esport scene from those countries"
sumihiro [#31]How to say "I don't follow any esport scene from those countries" without saying "I don't follow any esport scene from those countries"
how to say 'brazil is only good at a game noone plays or watches' without saying 'brazil sucks at esports'