this is gonna be super close ngl, guess we'll have to see!
Minor updates to observing
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
264 167 | 19 7 12 | / 19 12 7 / | 7 1 6 | 0 -5 +5 | 156 99 | 16% 24% 12% | 8 4 4 | 3 1 2 | +5 +3 +2 | |||
|
255 184 | 23 6 17 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 0 4 | +11 -3 +14 | 200 112 | 45% 33% 50% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
204 128 | 16 6 10 | / 16 9 7 / | 9 1 8 | 0 -3 +3 | 118 67 | 28% 39% 21% | 4 0 4 | 1 1 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |||
|
181 69 | 15 9 6 | / 11 8 3 / | 11 2 9 | +4 +1 +3 | 129 40 | 26% 32% 18% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
127 88 | 10 3 7 | / 15 10 5 / | 4 0 4 | -5 -7 +2 | 74 45 | 13% 19% 7% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
226 135 | 19 10 9 | / 17 10 7 / | 10 5 5 | +2 0 +2 | 138 81 | 31% 17% 42% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
224 166 | 17 4 13 | / 20 11 9 / | 2 0 2 | -3 -7 +4 | 126 93 | 23% 17% 28% | 4 0 4 | 4 2 2 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
212 153 | 17 5 12 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 0 5 | +2 -5 +7 | 152 108 | 28% 27% 29% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
146 96 | 10 3 7 | / 17 11 6 / | 6 1 5 | -7 -8 +1 | 92 58 | 34% 31% 37% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
127 71 | 10 3 7 | / 14 11 3 / | 5 3 2 | -4 -8 +4 | 98 46 | 14% 19% 10% | 0 0 0 | 1 2 -1 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
265 158 | 40 19 21 | / 36 19 17 / | 10 2 8 | +4 0 +4 | 156 88 | 18% 23% 15% | 13 7 6 | 9 3 6 | +4 +4 0 | |||
|
246 181 | 43 10 33 | / 29 19 10 / | 11 3 8 | +14 -9 +23 | 175 111 | 43% 41% 44% | 2 2 0 | 5 3 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
204 85 | 34 21 13 | / 23 14 9 / | 23 9 14 | +11 +7 +4 | 138 54 | 29% 33% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
171 115 | 26 11 15 | / 35 17 18 / | 16 4 12 | -9 -6 -3 | 101 62 | 28% 29% 27% | 6 1 5 | 5 2 3 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
155 74 | 24 13 11 | / 31 19 12 / | 8 3 5 | -7 -6 -1 | 103 44 | 17% 22% 4% | 1 0 1 | 3 3 0 | -2 -3 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
219 152 | 33 9 24 | / 37 20 17 / | 10 5 5 | -4 -11 +7 | 131 86 | 19% 13% 22% | 10 2 8 | 7 3 4 | +3 -1 +4 | |||
|
216 140 | 36 12 24 | / 31 18 13 / | 12 2 10 | +5 -6 +11 | 150 91 | 30% 29% 31% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
204 80 | 32 20 12 | / 32 18 14 / | 8 1 7 | 0 +2 -2 | 130 53 | 34% 43% 26% | 6 3 3 | 7 3 4 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
181 111 | 29 13 16 | / 37 21 16 / | 18 7 11 | -8 -8 0 | 115 69 | 25% 12% 35% | 3 3 0 | 3 2 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
154 68 | 24 12 12 | / 30 17 13 / | 12 7 5 | -6 -5 -1 | 108 44 | 20% 29% 11% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
265 148 | 21 12 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 1 2 | +4 +5 -1 | 156 76 | 22% 23% 21% | 5 3 2 | 6 2 4 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
237 178 | 20 4 16 | / 17 10 7 / | 7 3 4 | +3 -6 +9 | 151 109 | 41% 50% 38% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
227 100 | 19 12 7 | / 12 6 6 / | 12 7 5 | +7 +6 +1 | 147 67 | 31% 35% 27% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
183 59 | 14 10 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 3 1 | -2 +1 -3 | 133 44 | 19% 24% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 2 -1 | -1 -2 +1 | |||
|
137 102 | 10 5 5 | / 19 8 11 / | 7 3 4 | -9 -3 -6 | 83 56 | 27% 15% 35% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
261 65 | 22 17 5 | / 15 7 8 / | 2 0 2 | +7 +10 -3 | 169 47 | 34% 48% 18% | 4 3 1 | 5 1 4 | -1 +2 -3 | |||
|
219 127 | 19 7 12 | / 16 8 8 / | 7 2 5 | +3 -1 +4 | 147 74 | 32% 30% 34% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
213 138 | 16 5 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 8 5 3 | -1 -4 +3 | 135 79 | 15% 9% 19% | 6 2 4 | 3 1 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
181 66 | 14 9 5 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 4 3 | -2 +3 -5 | 118 41 | 26% 36% 13% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
135 87 | 10 3 7 | / 20 11 9 / | 8 2 6 | -10 -8 -2 | 91 57 | 19% 6% 28% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
I think 100 Thieves should in theory take this easily. The improvement that they have shown between qualifiers have been huge. They look like by far the most structured team in NA, and I trust in the team to continue their rapid growth.
We've seen a lot more of T1 than we have 100T, so some people might think T1 will win. T1 has shown slower, but steady improvements over a long period of time. However considering the trajectories of both teams, I expect 100T to be one of the tournament favorites while T1 to be a tier below.
ideekae [#3]Lowkey a battle for the egos of the IGLs lmao
a game of who malds first, steel or dazed.
we lose to GLAWKS
wmzgod [#28]really classic xd
big lead and forgot how to play
WIN CONDITIONS for t1:
be up by more than 5 rounds
choke a lead and go to overtime
win in ot
jayy [#30]WIN CONDITIONS for t1:
be up by more than 5 rounds
choke a lead and go to overtime
win in ot
didnt have to do em like that bro
Shumo [#13]2-0 T1. The god that is Sayaplayer will outbrain them on Kings row ez clap.
saya may be good at widow, but he really aint provin his worth at omen. Throw1 is back in the house
C9fansarecucks [#34]This was goat level choke from T1, 2 hiko defuses have made it happen
Should have been 10-2 and easy instead 9-3 and gave them a chance, Dazed and Spyder were ASS
honestly that pistol round shouldnt have even gone t1's way n the first place. spyder was isolated trying to fall back into the smoke and somehow one taps 2 of the 4 100t members encroaching on him
interesting alternative to 100t's showers sandwich
https://clips.twitch.tv/HardDeliciousArtichokeKeyboardCat
saya ults from b long, azk blinds off of ska's contact and ska dashes to avoid the spam
100t's showers sandwich on their half was an omen blind from the boost with steel playing a similar position to ska, but asuna was the one ulting thru tele
THAT WAS SUCH A GOOD MATCH TO WATCH THOUGH
C9fansarecucks [#46]T1 needs one of those cracked kids like Asuna instead of AZK
They play like cucks too much, just Ska being aggressive the others all passive, Spyder sometimes is aggressive too but it's not enough
Yes I think azk is the first one to go next year
C9fansarecucks [#46]T1 needs one of those cracked kids like Asuna instead of AZK
They play like cucks too much, just Ska being aggressive the others all passive, Spyder sometimes is aggressive too but it's not enough
Just because they lost doesn't mean they have to make changes... T1 looked great but 100T just played a bit better. T1 would have to be idiotic to make a roster change after how great they've been playing lately just because they lost 2 very close maps to a top 4 team in NA.
C9fansarecucks [#46]T1 needs one of those cracked kids like Asuna instead of AZK
They play like cucks too much, just Ska being aggressive the others all passive, Spyder sometimes is aggressive too but it's not enough
true, azk collecting paychecks because of his nickname in cs , who isnt even that good there lmao
Tanki5D [#52]true, azk collecting paychecks because of his nickname in cs , who isnt even that good there lmao
All you look at is fragging... AZK is a very diverse player and a very good support player. He's played Omen, Breach, Sova, Jett, Sage and is always(except for maybe when he was playing Jett for a bit) setting up his teammates. It's easy to pick out bad players based on the scoreboard but that isn't all that matters.
Fat_Lard [#53]All you look at is fragging... AZK is a very diverse player and a very good support player. He's played Omen, Breach, Sova, Jett, Sage and is always(except for maybe when he was playing Jett for a bit) setting up his teammates. It's easy to pick out bad players based on the scoreboard but that isn't all that matters.
imo i think t1 would benefit a lot from spyder on second duelists and azk on omen. there are times where he has his moments of brilliance on breach but i felt way more convinced after bind that he belongs on omen way more.
though i dont think it's the role i think t1 doesn't really utilize breach well aside from his ult