7

There's something KOI isnt telling us

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Ailed

First I want to start by saying im not putting against Riot to do something scummy for profit.

But that being said, the only time we ever saw something like this was with Bleed, and they obviously did something very fucked.

Ibai's explanation of "low placement and low skin sales" makes close to ZERO sense given Riot saying it was a clear breach of contract.

There is obviously something more that happened on KOI's side, dont be too quick to make opinions on this until the full explanation comes out.

#2
gamergirl
20
Frags
+

KOI has literally been accused of terrible management in the past for a reson

lets not forget players were preferring to stay in T2 over KOI in T1 and mfs acting like its just money lul

#3
SleepingSnorlax
0
Frags
+

Riot can easily get excused by saying breach of contract but it doesn’t make sense from their side as well

#7
Ailed
8
Frags
+

contracts are not that subjective

again, im not putting it against riot to do something scummy, but I think KOI not giving us the full picture is a lot more likely

#4
Galactc
0
Frags
+

Yeah tbh I feel like there's always something we just don't know about and yeah the reasoning would be incredibly scummy so I doubt that part a bit unfortunately I think we'll never know the full story

#10
Ailed
0
Frags
+

hopefully it can be explained by Ibai and Riot doesnt have to air it out themselves

#5
SnorlaxEnjoyer
0
Frags
+

I mean it's well known that they had horrible management so idk they fucked themselves over for sure

#6
dimmed
0
Frags
+

100%, I doubt Riot just ruined their relationship with KOI just to get M8 back

#8
Galactc
2
Frags
+

With how popular they are in the LEC there's just no way

#9
pkkkk
0
Frags
+

yeah this is prob the real answer, no way riot is just dumb liek that to kick koi out, ik they'll get more views if m8 comes back but still riot aint that dumb

#11
TM06Nick
0
Frags
+

Supposedly KOi is the only team of 48 with a clause to co stream every game and that was not followed

#12
JaaX
2
Frags
+

I gonna tried to say this in english sry if im wrong. What i heard from Ibai and Fernando is this: the problem was that Ibai was not doing the costreams (sometimes was there but not directly incresing numbers from his acc) and it seems that they are the only club that had stipulated that ibai should be there. I think is a poor excuse, they have a huge costream without Ibai. Fernando said that their performance wasn't the point, it was bad but in every league in any sport or esport u gonna see good and bad teams. And it feels that VCT needs M8.
If I interpreted something wrong u can correct me but i understand this. Oh and KOI gonna close everything in Valo.

#14
Ailed
0
Frags
+

why was this not mentioned in the 10 minute video

its feel so disingenuous that Ibai tried to paint the picture that "Riot is greedy," regardless of the accountability KOI was taking

thank you for the explanation :)

#15
JaaX
0
Frags
+

Ibai didnt know, he thought that Riot was pleased with their costream. And they have a point to kick them seeing the whole picture but it seems that the decision was bc of the costream.

#13
Invic_Deep
3
Frags
+

I mean if KOI isnt telling us then I expect Riot to do so bcz its bad look for them too. I mean they should have been clearer in their ruling like they were with bleed issue in the first place itself

#16
TM06Nick
0
Frags
+

If it was an unlawful termination ibai could just stop yapping and sue riot

Something tells me he won't be doing that 🤭

#17
SadPandaBear
0
Frags
+

He has a LoL team, I’m not sure he wants to completely sour the relationship with Riot.

#18
TM06Nick
0
Frags
+

The other guy from koi, graven was considerably less salty than Ibai in his statement and it seems ibai is the one with the big issue here

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment