Is this for forth strike?
Minor updates to observing
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
322 262 | 17 4 13 | / 9 2 7 / | 11 5 6 | +8 +2 +6 | 206 173 | 35% 50% 31% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
276 247 | 19 3 16 | / 6 1 5 / | 4 1 3 | +13 +2 +11 | 182 161 | 31% 11% 36% | 2 0 2 | 1 2 -1 | +1 -2 +3 | |||
|
246 199 | 18 5 13 | / 8 1 7 / | 3 1 2 | +10 +4 +6 | 159 133 | 34% 14% 46% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
226 176 | 13 4 9 | / 7 1 6 / | 7 2 5 | +6 +3 +3 | 134 109 | 23% 30% 20% | 3 1 2 | 1 0 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
192 154 | 8 4 4 | / 10 3 7 / | 8 1 7 | -2 +1 -3 | 110 85 | 6% 17% 3% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
218 45 | 12 11 1 | / 15 11 4 / | 2 1 1 | -3 0 -3 | 193 8 | 39% 42% 25% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
152 5 | 9 9 0 | / 15 11 4 / | 2 0 2 | -6 -2 -4 | 85 3 | 18% 19% 0% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
147 43 | 8 5 3 | / 16 12 4 / | 2 1 1 | -8 -7 -1 | 80 13 | 14% 20% 0% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
140 29 | 6 5 1 | / 14 10 4 / | 4 3 1 | -8 -5 -3 | 100 17 | 20% 24% 9% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
121 39 | 5 3 2 | / 15 11 4 / | 4 4 0 | -10 -8 -2 | 78 17 | 7% 4% 25% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
299 190 | 49 20 29 | / 18 6 12 / | 10 3 7 | +31 +14 +17 | 184 114 | 31% 27% 34% | 4 2 2 | 1 2 -1 | +3 0 +3 | |||
|
258 164 | 33 12 21 | / 27 11 16 / | 16 7 9 | +6 +1 +5 | 151 101 | 35% 44% 30% | 7 3 4 | 6 1 5 | +1 +2 -1 | |||
|
250 128 | 39 20 19 | / 25 9 16 / | 12 5 7 | +14 +11 +3 | 162 83 | 31% 27% 37% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
191 135 | 23 6 17 | / 23 10 13 / | 15 9 6 | 0 -4 +4 | 147 109 | 22% 17% 27% | 6 1 5 | 7 1 6 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
185 126 | 22 9 13 | / 29 12 17 / | 12 1 11 | -7 -3 -4 | 114 72 | 16% 23% 12% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
203 84 | 25 17 8 | / 34 19 15 / | 8 6 2 | -9 -2 -7 | 148 39 | 30% 30% 31% | 5 2 3 | 6 3 3 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
192 74 | 27 16 11 | / 30 19 11 / | 10 5 5 | -3 -3 0 | 126 42 | 13% 17% 7% | 3 3 0 | 0 0 0 | +3 +3 0 | |||
|
186 73 | 27 16 11 | / 30 18 12 / | 8 5 3 | -3 -2 -1 | 139 50 | 27% 22% 39% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | |||
|
161 72 | 25 17 8 | / 37 21 16 / | 10 3 7 | -12 -4 -8 | 104 47 | 32% 28% 38% | 5 2 3 | 5 3 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
147 69 | 18 10 8 | / 35 22 13 / | 11 9 2 | -17 -12 -5 | 88 38 | 18% 19% 18% | 5 3 2 | 6 3 3 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
322 151 | 30 17 13 | / 12 5 7 / | 6 2 4 | +18 +12 +6 | 186 83 | 31% 31% 32% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
253 81 | 21 15 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 9 4 5 | +4 +7 -3 | 164 50 | 29% 32% 24% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
193 99 | 16 8 8 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 2 3 | -2 -1 -1 | 114 53 | 35% 41% 28% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
177 107 | 14 5 9 | / 19 9 10 / | 4 0 4 | -5 -4 -1 | 116 62 | 27% 26% 27% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
156 108 | 10 2 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 8 7 1 | -6 -7 +1 | 155 109 | 22% 13% 36% | 3 0 3 | 6 1 5 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
237 95 | 19 11 8 | / 14 7 7 / | 8 4 4 | +5 +4 +1 | 157 62 | 13% 16% 9% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
231 102 | 21 11 10 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 2 2 | +5 +3 +2 | 164 71 | 31% 20% 55% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 | |||
|
188 110 | 13 6 7 | / 19 8 11 / | 6 5 1 | -6 -2 -4 | 118 60 | 25% 19% 32% | 5 2 3 | 2 2 0 | +3 0 +3 | |||
|
173 89 | 13 7 6 | / 20 11 9 / | 7 5 2 | -7 -4 -3 | 95 51 | 27% 56% 17% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
170 117 | 16 8 8 | / 22 10 12 / | 8 3 5 | -6 -2 -4 | 117 76 | 42% 43% 42% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 |
aunathons [#2]their roster is looking rough. without shanks or poised, it feels like a 3v5 when they play.
Hard disagree. Oderus has been a little underwhelming but Makka has had some really good moments. I think this roster has the same potential that the old DIG had, if not more. I don't think any team with Shanks is going to find any success long term, the guy was waaaay too immature to play at the highest level.
Wealth_and_Taste [#3]Hard disagree. Oderus has been a little underwhelming but Makka has had some really good moments. I think this roster has the same potential that the old DIG had, if not more. I don't think any team with Shanks is going to find any success long term, the guy was waaaay too immature to play at the highest level.
agreed with this. makka has a ways to go but the rest of em can perform. shanks aint good
Wealth_and_Taste [#3]Hard disagree. Oderus has been a little underwhelming but Makka has had some really good moments. I think this roster has the same potential that the old DIG had, if not more. I don't think any team with Shanks is going to find any success long term, the guy was waaaay too immature to play at the highest level.
this is just wrong
aunathons [#2]their roster is looking rough. without shanks or poised, it feels like a 3v5 when they play.
Have you not been watching their games? It doesn't feel like a 3v5 at all... supamen is consistently a great player, Makka has looked great as well, Psalm is better on the sova in my opinion but is still great on the Reyna, dephh is a great supportive player and Oderus is a good Jett/Raze awper. Oderus is inconsistent and dephh definitely has the least individual skill but they play great together and it does not look like a 3v5 at all.