Are 100T guaranteed #1 seed no matter what happens in the LEV game?
How do 3 way ties work again, is it round diff that takes priority?
1
If KRU beat NRG
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
you should pay attention is school but ill give you benefit of the doubt,
6/5
6/3
100t lose 2-0, its 8/5, 6/5
100t 2-1, 8/6, 7/5
when you also lose rounds, its not only just plus +for the winning team, it also subtracts -from the losing team, lets say you lose 13-6 13-8, so +24 in rounds for lev and +9 in rounds for 100t, but lets say it was closer like, 13-9, 13-10, +19 in rounds for LEV and +14 in rounds for 100T, lord have mercy on you brother
holy shit no way u are this dumb. the diff is +9 so 100t just can't go down more than 4. so if the scoreline is 13-5, 12-14, 9-13. and 100t loses then 100t have won a total of +2 rounds leaving them with +23 rounds and so they are above lev in rounds and tied on maps. and so in a 4 way tie where 100t loses to lev and nrg loses to kru then 100t would be first even tho they lost to lev.
if you lose a game, your gonna have worse rounds and maps.. its kinda LOGIC bro
help me find the word impossible, i stated the when you lose a game your going to have worse rounds and maps when its that close between 2 teams map diff and round diff, ofc you have to pray for a 11-13 and 11-13 or win map 1/2 dominantly which isnt probable because we have the same map pool as you guys. our bind, haven, lotus are all really good maps for us
Based on how I interpreted the tiebreaker rules, since its a 4 way tie with 100T and LEV having head-to-head against 2 of the teams they are tied with, they should be placed in a seperate group subgroup to KRU and NRG, then LEV have head-to-head so I assumed they'd be 1st seed.
- The following "Subgroup Tie-breaker Rule" will be applied for 3+ Team tie-breakers:
- If any Team(s) can be clearly ranked highest based on the given criterion (e.g., head-to-head match score), all teams will be split into two subgroups: the top Team(s) and the remaining Team(s). The remaining Teams are treated as one group, even if they are no longer tied under that criterion.
- A new tiebreaker is then applied from the beginning, based on the number of Teams in each subgroup.
- Example: In a 4-way tie, if two Teams can be clearly ranked highest using the given criterion, the four Teams will be split into two 2-Team subgroups. Each subgroup will then follow the 2-way tiebreaker process, starting from (1) Head-to-head Match Score.
If no team clearly beats every other team in the group, the next criteria will be used
There is already an example case in Pacific Stage 1
https://www.vlr.gg/event/2379/vct-2025-pacific-stage-1/group-stage
(subgroup : RRQ TLN T1 NS) RRQ has the best map differential, RRQ #1
(subgroup : TLN T1 NS) TLN defeated both NS and T1, TLN #2
(subgroup : T1 NS) T1 won against NS, T1 #3 and NS #4
r u basing ur info off that stage 1 tiebracker?? bc there is another method that would end with the same result and its by doing it one by one and so in the 4 way tie bracker there is no clear winner for h2h so it goes to maps, rrq then win first seed from maps. then its a 3 way tiebracker by talon make 2nd seed bc they have clear h2h advantage and then final 2 h2h and t1 has that advantage.
this method is prob wrong but im just wondering if yk this for a fact or ur just basing it off stage 1 pacific
Ok this is what Paraplant said yesterday, shout out to them and upvote their post here: https://www.vlr.gg/531212/americas-and-emea-playoffs
If MIBR beat LOUD, then both of them are out, so in the following scenarios it is assumed that LOUD win
100T beat LEV + NRG beat KRU -> 100T, NRG, KRU, LOUD are in (in order), LEV are out
100T beat LEV + KRU beat NRG -> 100T, KRU, NRG, LOUD are in, LEV are out
LEV beat 100T + NRG beat KRU -> NRG, LEV, 100T, KRU are in, LOUD are out
LEV beat 100T + KRU beat NRG -> LEV, 100T, KRU, NRG are in, LOUD are out
Discord