I made a post during masters bangkok that s1mon should be dropped and I said this even after champions. Just because a team is winning doesn't mean they should keep they same roster despite a player being deadweight. That mentality is why many team falloff after winning an event. Turns out all along that I was right since s1mon is now getting dropped. I understand the average IQ is 100 and people are stupid but how could you think keeping a double-negative player was a good idea for winning?
0
REGARDING: sub s1mon = reverse sweep
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
PokeKidMax [#3]in a breach meta, has top 5 breach util in the world
wrong + carried by chichoo + tier 3 talent + would have won with haodong
nexate2003 [#4]wrong + carried by chichoo + tier 3 talent + would have won with haodong
He can be bad individually and still be a way better flash player than Haodong, there's a reason why they went 0-2 in Shanghai with Haodong and won Champs with S1mon
Discord