if the scrim tier 1 teams and have good coaches
for example shopify rebellion gold
GENUINE QUESTION NOT TRYING TO BAIT OR SHIT LIKE THAT
women historically played less videogames for a myriad of reasons (hostile environments, unmotivation from family, society norms, etc), and this began to change only in this last decade. so the talent pool is smaller and we have less great players. GC purpose is to give them more space to grow on a professional scenario, that previously they wouldn't have, and evolve to eventually conquer more space on the mixed scene on long-term
foythvlr [#5]women historically played less videogames for a myriad of reasons (hostile environments, unmotivation from family, society norms, etc), and this began to change only in this last decade. so the talent pool is smaller and we have less great players. GC purpose is to give them more space to grow on a professional scenario, that previously they wouldn't have, and evolve to eventually conquer more space on the mixed scene on long-term
^^ Best explaination
cameran [#6]scrimming better teams mean nothing, your just gonna get destroyed anyways
take m80 for example, them scrimming better teams is NOT an advantage cuz t1 gap over t2 is so big that you practically learn nothing at all cuz get shit on
braindead take
Window [#8]braindead take
which part?
t1 gap over t2? t2 teams scrimming t1 teams and getting destroyed? t2 ppl not learning anything? which part
all 3 parts are correct, why u think cubert is ass? cuz they learn NOTHING from scrimming SEN + other t1 teams
also for m80 i meant last year and why they didnt win ascension, ppl made it a big deal when scirmming t1 teams did nothing
cameran [#9]which part?
t1 gap over t2? t2 teams scrimming t1 teams and getting destroyed? t2 ppl not learning anything? which part
all 3 parts are correct, why u think cubert is ass? cuz they learn NOTHING from scrimming SEN + other t1 teamsalso for m80 i meant last year and why they didnt win ascension, ppl made it a big deal when scirmming t1 teams did nothing
Gap between t1 and t2 is team dependent. G2 is great and 2G is ass. Top t2 teams may do good against bottom t1 teams. Scrims also don't tell the whole story. If a team is practicing a specific thing the entire scrim and getting rolled, it is not representative of their skill.
t2 teams also do learn from playing. Some teams may learn better, but at the end of the day, scrimming and having a coach's input will help the players, not matter how miniscule. Cubert's results does not mean the entirety of t2 is bad, nor does it mean practice provides no help.
Window [#10]Gap between t1 and t2 is team dependent. G2 is great and 2G is ass. Top t2 teams may do good against bottom t1 teams. Scrims also don't tell the whole story. If a team is practicing a specific thing the entire scrim and getting rolled, it is not representative of their skill.
t2 teams also do learn from playing. Some teams may learn better, but at the end of the day, scrimming and having a coach's input will help the players, not matter how miniscule. Cubert's results does not mean the entirety of t2 is bad, nor does it mean practice provides no help.
damn well said cant even respond defensively on my part frfr
Window [#10]Gap between t1 and t2 is team dependent. G2 is great and 2G is ass. Top t2 teams may do good against bottom t1 teams. Scrims also don't tell the whole story. If a team is practicing a specific thing the entire scrim and getting rolled, it is not representative of their skill.
t2 teams also do learn from playing. Some teams may learn better, but at the end of the day, scrimming and having a coach's input will help the players, not matter how miniscule. Cubert's results does not mean the entirety of t2 is bad, nor does it mean practice provides no help.
Give a little bit more time to 2G, they best player hasn't played yet, sometime life is full of suprise