FPX win 2-1 close game
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.31 1.23 1.39 | 300 285 315 | 25 11 14 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 4 2 | +7 +1 +6 | 67% 67% 67% | 194 190 198 | 31% 33% 29% | 2 1 1 | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
![]() |
1.11 1.09 1.13 | 197 208 186 | 17 9 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 3 2 | +1 -1 +2 | 79% 75% 83% | 117 126 108 | 17% 22% 13% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
![]() |
0.98 0.44 1.52 | 169 101 237 | 14 4 10 | / 15 10 5 / | 4 2 2 | -1 -6 +5 | 67% 50% 83% | 121 70 172 | 30% 10% 46% | 0 0 0 | 4 4 0 | -4 -4 0 | |
![]() |
0.84 0.94 0.74 | 145 162 128 | 10 5 5 | / 18 10 8 / | 20 11 9 | -8 -5 -3 | 75% 67% 83% | 87 103 71 | 39% 47% 31% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
![]() |
0.66 0.43 0.90 | 169 136 202 | 13 5 8 | / 21 12 9 / | 4 2 2 | -8 -7 -1 | 58% 42% 75% | 102 79 125 | 15% 9% 19% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.65 1.71 1.58 | 376 384 368 | 32 16 16 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 1 4 | +16 +8 +8 | 75% 67% 83% | 246 213 279 | 40% 54% 31% | 6 3 3 | 1 1 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
![]() |
1.08 0.84 1.33 | 159 125 193 | 14 6 8 | / 12 8 4 / | 10 2 8 | +2 -2 +4 | 83% 83% 83% | 102 72 132 | 55% 33% 80% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
![]() |
0.85 0.54 1.17 | 172 134 210 | 15 5 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 8 3 5 | -2 -4 +2 | 75% 67% 83% | 124 97 151 | 43% 38% 48% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
![]() |
0.84 0.75 0.92 | 182 189 175 | 15 7 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 5 3 2 | -2 -3 +1 | 75% 67% 83% | 114 127 101 | 35% 33% 38% | 3 2 1 | 6 3 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
![]() |
0.74 0.27 1.22 | 142 51 233 | 12 2 10 | / 17 10 7 / | 2 0 2 | -5 -8 +3 | 75% 58% 92% | 94 38 150 | 19% 25% 17% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() ![]() |
1.20 1.28 1.24 | 212 230 193 | 36 19 17 | / 27 17 10 / | 16 9 7 | +9 +2 +7 | 77% 79% 74% | 129 148 110 | 18% 19% 16% | 4 2 2 | 5 2 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.98 1.36 1.16 | 256 221 294 | 40 16 24 | / 32 17 15 / | 10 7 3 | +8 -1 +9 | 70% 71% 70% | 171 151 192 | 22% 23% 24% | 6 4 2 | 8 4 4 | -2 0 -2 | |
![]() ![]() |
1.04 1.27 1.15 | 210 217 201 | 37 20 17 | / 28 17 11 / | 10 5 5 | +9 +3 +6 | 72% 71% 74% | 145 151 140 | 29% 26% 30% | 2 0 2 | 6 5 1 | -4 -5 +1 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.75 1.28 1.01 | 212 164 260 | 35 15 20 | / 35 20 15 / | 11 5 6 | 0 -5 +5 | 77% 67% 87% | 137 109 166 | 25% 25% 26% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.83 0.64 0.74 | 127 154 99 | 17 10 7 | / 33 19 14 / | 31 17 14 | -16 -9 -7 | 74% 75% 74% | 78 94 61 | 34% 36% 32% | 4 3 1 | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() ![]() |
1.36 1.19 1.28 | 253 262 249 | 42 21 21 | / 30 15 15 / | 9 4 5 | +12 +6 +6 | 74% 74% 75% | 174 153 194 | 35% 45% 30% | 7 4 3 | 2 1 1 | +5 +3 +2 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.95 1.16 1.06 | 206 197 213 | 35 16 19 | / 33 16 17 / | 16 5 11 | +2 0 +2 | 72% 65% 79% | 135 129 142 | 37% 36% 35% | 4 2 2 | 2 0 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
![]() |
0.80 1.05 0.93 | 164 147 179 | 26 12 14 | / 31 17 14 / | 18 6 12 | -5 -5 0 | 72% 74% 71% | 107 97 117 | 39% 27% 41% | 3 1 2 | 2 0 2 | +1 +1 0 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.60 0.98 0.80 | 174 163 184 | 30 12 18 | / 36 19 17 / | 7 4 3 | -6 -7 +1 | 64% 52% 75% | 116 116 116 | 42% 40% 43% | 9 4 5 | 14 9 5 | -5 -5 0 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.34 1.12 0.74 | 134 52 213 | 22 4 18 | / 35 18 17 / | 12 3 9 | -13 -14 +1 | 72% 57% 88% | 86 32 138 | 21% 33% 18% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.37 1.07 1.70 | 255 192 324 | 22 10 12 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 3 4 | +8 +2 +6 | 96% 92% 100% | 173 139 210 | 35% 41% 31% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
![]() |
1.37 1.32 1.43 | 227 252 200 | 19 10 9 | / 11 7 4 / | 11 6 5 | +8 +3 +5 | 74% 83% 64% | 142 169 113 | 18% 17% 20% | 3 2 1 | 2 1 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
![]() |
1.33 1.63 1.00 | 251 332 163 | 23 16 7 | / 13 7 6 / | 6 3 3 | +10 +9 +1 | 78% 92% 64% | 171 232 104 | 27% 36% 13% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
![]() |
1.01 0.72 1.32 | 212 157 272 | 15 5 10 | / 14 7 7 / | 4 3 1 | +1 -2 +3 | 74% 75% 73% | 147 112 185 | 13% 8% 18% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
![]() |
0.63 0.72 0.52 | 108 146 67 | 7 5 2 | / 15 9 6 / | 11 6 5 | -8 -4 -4 | 74% 83% 64% | 68 85 49 | 29% 28% 33% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.27 1.39 1.16 | 239 265 215 | 20 11 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 8 2 6 | +4 +4 0 | 70% 64% 75% | 147 163 132 | 30% 35% 26% | 2 2 0 | 2 0 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
![]() |
0.89 0.99 0.80 | 130 129 131 | 10 5 5 | / 14 7 7 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -2 -2 | 74% 82% 67% | 99 88 109 | 29% 29% 29% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
![]() |
0.76 0.77 0.76 | 168 171 165 | 12 6 6 | / 19 9 10 / | 8 4 4 | -7 -3 -4 | 61% 64% 58% | 113 124 103 | 23% 22% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.75 0.44 1.03 | 165 135 193 | 15 5 10 | / 19 9 10 / | 2 1 1 | -4 -4 0 | 52% 36% 67% | 118 103 132 | 48% 50% 47% | 6 2 4 | 8 6 2 | -2 -4 +2 | |
![]() |
0.73 0.41 1.03 | 126 53 193 | 10 2 8 | / 18 8 10 / | 10 3 7 | -8 -6 -2 | 70% 55% 83% | 78 26 126 | 23% 50% 19% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
Himmelgoat [#15]Nova is dogwater
it basically 3v5.And obone is nepotism pick over swerl. 0o0o0 is igl so can't expect much fragging but he is way better than obone.
Ronyko23 [#16]it basically 3v5.And obone is nepotism pick over swerl. 0o0o0 is igl so can't expect much fragging but he is way better than obone.
swerl has wrist problems
Densi [#25]Obone looks more comfortable on sentinel then duelist, but he's forced Guang and CB to both play off roles where they don't thrive. Obone either needs to play duelist competently or get dropped.
yeah. i think nova is good enough to make top 3. And def gonna make roster move for perma duelist after their first int exp.
Ronyko23 [#26]yeah. i think nova is good enough to make top 3. And def gonna make roster move for perma duelist after their first int exp.
Bro they don't even need a great duelist, just like a somewhat competent one is enough.
Densi [#27]Bro they don't even need a great duelist, just like a somewhat competent one is enough.
yeah. Guan g only looks conf on sent. And cb is best ini & can flex.Just pick any academy duelist over obone.Even cb perf dips on duelist.
honziikkk [#29]Yosemite pickup ruined fpx sns
nah nova is just better. They gonna win cn with proper duelist.Fpx is also great better than trace imo.
Ronyko23 [#30]nah nova is just better. They gonna win cn with proper duelist.Fpx is also great better than trace imo.
FPX with lysoar was 100x better. He clears yosemite any day in a week
Mrkwave [#36]What nova need now is duelist
The option
Spitfires = i miss him , one of the best duelist in cn last year and fa btw
Kai = if nova had money , they can buyout him but likely small chance trace gonna sell kai
T2 players = Green , Suyjing
Feng f on perma duelist gonna cook on nova. And trace is holding him back in flex role.
Ronyko23 [#37]Feng f on perma duelist gonna cook on nova. And trace is holding him back in flex role.
But feng f can't play jett , kai is probably better option since he always in duelist role in trace
honziikkk [#31]FPX with lysoar was 100x better. He clears yosemite any day in a week
lysoar hasnt gone positive in stage 1 yet
yosemite went +20 in their last 2 games
its pretty obvious who the better player is
honziikkk [#31]FPX with lysoar was 100x better. He clears yosemite any day in a week
What are you on? Yosemite has been way better on FPX than Lysoar has been on Wolves