Sorry? I am talking about Champs being in EU, I believe you misunderstood what I said
4
CS vs Val debate
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
NA timezone is good for eu too so i dont really understand why u think champs in eu would get more wiewers than champs in NA for example
Because the first and second place peaks of VCT events are both in EU, EU is very much the sweet spot for any game as it allows every region to watch with ease, I would 100 percent take over an EU event over any other myself which is why CS events are far more watchable at most times for me
NA times for champs wasnt bad for eu and pacific has bad times no matter if its eu or NA so it doesnt really make a difference
btw the Chinese league alone peaked over 1.88 million viewers last year which was more than the pgl copenhagen major
yeah but the fact that just the Chinese league alone exceeds the PGL Copenhagen viewers (excluding China) shows how big Valo is
sure its big in china cause they know they can compete in it and all the big orgs with fans are invested,but in terms of passion for the esport cs is miles ahead,if valorant was a eu only game with 0 good chinese teams do u think the hype would be similar to what it is now?
bros bring back that "if" shit again lmao
what is your point tho
so your point is that if there was no Chinese viewership Valo wouldn't be big? Well thats just wrong because Champs without Chinese viewership still surpassed the Shanghai major and Katowice.
also what kind of stupid debate is "if valorant was a eu only game"
i could just flip that around and say what if Europe didnt exist in CS? then it would also lose a ton of viewership
no my point is that china wouldnt care more about valorant as a game if chinese teams werent performing,the fact cs esports is so popular in china even tho they are only fans of mostly eu teams and theres basically no chinese representation in tier 1 just shows the difference
Discord