recently, concerns about the viewership have been expressed and some people have attributed it to the absence of the face of valorant, tenz. having a very prominent figure is very important for the health of the sport. this is seen with faker in LoL, i didn't watch a single game of league but caught the grand finals to watch him play. one could say this extends slightly to real sports like basketball, for example, lebron (don't quote me, i don't know anything about basketball).
BUT tenz feels like an outlier to me, since faker and lebron obviously attribute a lot of their success to being some of the best at their respective sport, but tenz was good for two tournaments, maybe three. hell, you could even say his team was shit at times! valorant isn't even as old as the aforementioned legacies. this made me wonder how someone like Tenz even gets to this point. there are most definitely better players than tenz, but you could only reach his influence by combining multiple of theirs.
i see him eventually fading out if he doesn't come back, but how does someone even come close? is it just a matter of time and winnings? it feels like he was WAY too popular for such a young game. is it just a lack of anyone else to turn to? chronicle won a bunch, yet my friends couldn't even tell me 1 thing they know about the fella.