Wonder if they are going for split duelist or Koalanoob is working on Raze...
tteokbokki [#2]koalanoob pure duelist even if that means we have to see some shit raze
I mean his Raze is not shit per say
For someone who hadn't played Raze all year, he did pretty well on that Bind vs 2G
Denjisideals [#3]I mean his Raze is not shit per say
For someone who hadn't played Raze all year, he did pretty well on that Bind vs 2G
anyways
koalanoob - duelist
ange1 -
shao -
ruxic -
hiro -
yea unfortunately this team has 4 people who play every role in the game
tteokbokki [#4]anyways
koalanoob - duelist
ange1 -
shao -
ruxic -
hiro -yea unfortunately this team has 4 people who play every role in the game
ange1 smokes/flex shao init/flex hiro senti/flex ruxic flex
LocoMonteiro [#5]koala baiting on duelist with angel suiciding himself first 20 secs so he can "call better"
Regardless of your opinion on Koala, one thing you cannot call him in good conscience is a baiter
nobody___100 [#6]ange1 smokes/flex shao init/flex hiro senti/flex ruxic flex
ruxic is a controller player he can finally lift the fucking smokes role off the 2 mfs who keep swapping for fun each map
ange1 is gonna be the flex wether thats brimstone on bind or gekko or kayo
DSGFan [#7]Regardless of your opinion on Koala, one thing you cannot call him in good conscience is a baiter
https://www.vlr.gg/399770/2game-esports-vs-m80-champions-tour-2024-americas-ascension-gf
played duelist on 4 maps and the only player on his team that had less first duels was nismo.....explain
LocoMonteiro [#9]https://www.vlr.gg/399770/2game-esports-vs-m80-champions-tour-2024-americas-ascension-gf
played duelist on 4 maps and the only player on his team that had less first duels was nismo.....explain
M80 fights as a team. They always do team executes, so it makes sense for his team to have a decent percentage of the first engagements. And the way you worded that is extremely misleading, because only one player had more first engages than him, and that was Zander who was this roster's anchor player on defense.
You're also conveniently ignoring that his 1st engagement success rate was tied with Zander being the highest on his team.
And lastly the game you cherry picked was a loss, so of course stats aren't going to be the best. Like, look at the game he played right before lol: https://www.vlr.gg/399772/all-knights-vs-m80-champions-tour-2024-americas-ascension-lbf
+11FK/FD with 37 first engagements. So even when his team loses, he has a respectable scoreline, and he absolutely can fry and bring home wins. He plays for his team.
DSGFan [#10]M80 fights as a team. They always do team executes, so it makes sense for his team to have a decent percentage of the first engagements. And the way you worded that is extremely misleading, because only one player had more first engages than him, and that was Zander who was this roster's anchor player on defense.
You're also conveniently ignoring that his 1st engagement success rate was tied with Zander being the highest on his team.
And lastly the game you cherry picked was a loss, so of course stats aren't going to be the best. Like, look at the game he played right before lol: https://www.vlr.gg/399772/all-knights-vs-m80-champions-tour-2024-americas-ascension-lbf
+11FK/FD with 37 first engagements. So even when his team loses, he has a respectable scoreline, and he absolutely can fry and bring home wins. He plays for his team.
Success rate has nothing to do with ‘baiting’
kanyefan4238173 [#13]Success rate has nothing to do with ‘baiting’
By definition if you have successful first engagement stats, you can't be baiting.
DSGFan [#14]By definition if you have successful first engagement stats, you can't be baiting.
?
I can have 1 first blood every 100 rounds but if I never die first my entry success rate is 100%
I’m sure eeiu has had games where he gets 1 or 2 first bloods with 0 or 1 first deaths but he’s still baiting
kanyefan4238173 [#15]?
I can have 1 first blood every 100 rounds but if I never die first my entry success rate is 100%
I’m sure eeiu has had games where he gets 1 or 2 first bloods with 0 or 1 first deaths but he’s still baiting
I used "stats" in the plural on purpose. Do you call taking 40% of all first engagements & winning ~70% of them being a baiter?
DSGFan [#21]I used "stats" in the plural on purpose. Do you call taking 40% of all first engagements & winning ~70% of them being a baiter?
No I wouldn’t
But would u call taking 45% of first engagements and losing 90% of them being a baiter?