Sinatra to 100T???

I know it sounds very random , but I think the only person who’s currently on the free agent market and worthy enough to drop steel, (a top 20 player in NA IMO) right before LCQ would be Sinatra. It might not make sense with hiko as a good sova main on the team, but if you think deeply, what 100t needs now is consistent firepower, which is what Sinatra can offer. And since hiko usually baits and stay back, a sentinel role shouldn’t be a hard transition for him.( or maybe 100t don’t even need to run a sentinel with 2 controller 2 initiater comp)

Idk like I said it’s pretty random, just wanna know what are the odds on this actually happens…

I just don't see it happening. They already have a replacement.

DeluluGavin [#2]

I just don't see it happening. They already have a replacement.

Boi it’s just a temporary sub, I believe once they find a good replacement, Boi will be back to be an analyst and sub

nobody picking up cilantro 😹

no hiko on sentinel aint happening lol

100T is an org thats literally all about their brand perception. Sinatraa is a player that comes with a LOT of brand risk. Personally, I think there's a 0% chance 100T even look his way. Nothing to do with professional Valorant, everything to do with politics and business.

Ryxn_1 [#3]

Boi it’s just a temporary sub, I believe once they find a good replacement, Boi will be back to be an analyst and sub

hm you have a point. But not sinatraa.

Wardy [#6]

100T is an org thats literally all about their brand perception. Sinatraa is a player that comes with a LOT of brand risk. Personally, I think there's a 0% chance 100T even look his way. Nothing to do with professional Valorant, everything to do with politics and business.

I mean steel was a controversial signing when he was first signed, he had his scandal back in the days and was seen as a toxic player in the cs community. He was still signed and performed well

Ryxn_1 [#8]

I mean steel was a controversial signing when he was first signed, he had his scandal back in the days and was seen as a toxic player in the cs community. He was still signed and performed well

I think being seen as toxic and having a straight up legal investigation for s*xual assault a few months back are a tad bit different brand risks for an org to take. Fans of an org won't riot over signing a "toxic" player. They'll riot if they think sinatraa is guilty and their fav org signs him. Just my thoughts tho

I dont see that hoodie org signing an alleged sexual assaulter

ciro [#10]

I dont see that hoodie org signing an alleged sexual assaulter

Basically what I said but in layman's terms LMAO

looklook [#5]

no hiko on sentinel aint happening lol

I think it can be quite good for him though cuz he's quite good in clutch situations and then he can also solo hold sites too lol. Don't think they are likely gonna add Sinatra tho

.

Ryxn_1 [#8]

I mean steel was a controversial signing when he was first signed, he had his scandal back in the days and was seen as a toxic player in the cs community. He was still signed and performed well

very different

Wardy [#6]

100T is an org thats literally all about their brand perception. Sinatraa is a player that comes with a LOT of brand risk. Personally, I think there's a 0% chance 100T even look his way. Nothing to do with professional Valorant, everything to do with politics and business.

look I understand but he was cleared of any wrongdoing and this shouldn't be stopping him from playing competitively

RK1Zompire [#12]

I think it can be quite good for him though cuz he's quite good in clutch situations and then he can also solo hold sites too lol. Don't think they are likely gonna add Sinatra tho

lol hiko dont play on site

Crackyoudown [#15]

look I understand but he was cleared of any wrongdoing and this shouldn't be stopping him from playing competitively

It's unfair that he will have to carry that stain on his reputation. But for these organisations, it's just business.

DeluluGavin [#2]

I just don't see it happening. They already have a replacement.

I don't see Sinatraa in particular happening, but a guy who hasn't played professionally (and probably hasn't scrimmed) since getting cut from a tier 2 team 5 months ago isn't 100T's replacement plan.

Wardy [#9]

I think being seen as toxic and having a straight up legal investigation for s*xual assault a few months back are a tad bit different brand risks for an org to take. Fans of an org won't riot over signing a "toxic" player. They'll riot if they think sinatraa is guilty and their fav org signs him. Just my thoughts tho

Yep, you are totally right. If sinatra will be signed, we the 100t fans will take it to the streets. Burn buildings, loot shops, flip cop cars and have nadeshot lynched.

sinatra goes to 100t but sinatraa goes to tsm

I wish they sign him but probably wont happen. Look at what happened with a brasilian cs 100t team not that long ago. Shouldve played a major as their first tourney but one dude from a team got baited on twitter, said some dumb stuff about gays and the whole team disbanded without playing any official match.

Crackyoudown [#15]

look I understand but he was cleared of any wrongdoing and this shouldn't be stopping him from playing competitively

Trust me, I want to see Sinatraa back in the pro scene too, it's just never gonna be with a major org with huge brands like 100T or TSM like others speculate. At least not anytime soon, I'd love to be proved wrong tho

Ryxn_1 [#8]

I mean steel was a controversial signing when he was first signed, he had his scandal back in the days and was seen as a toxic player in the cs community. He was still signed and performed well

very different circumstances here

hm