g2 gozen 2-1 siko
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.50 1.94 1.21 | 264 307 235 | 22 10 12 | / 9 3 6 / | 2 0 2 | +13 +7 +6 | 80% 100% 67% | 163 185 149 | 23% 30% 19% | 4 3 1 | 4 1 3 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
1.49 1.60 1.41 | 268 265 271 | 18 6 12 | / 10 4 6 / | 9 5 4 | +8 +2 +6 | 80% 88% 75% | 162 168 159 | 20% 11% 27% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.21 1.14 1.25 | 240 238 242 | 18 7 11 | / 13 6 7 / | 9 4 5 | +5 +1 +4 | 85% 75% 92% | 162 167 158 | 31% 32% 30% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.91 0.41 1.25 | 187 103 244 | 13 3 10 | / 14 6 8 / | 4 0 4 | -1 -3 +2 | 65% 38% 83% | 105 59 137 | 35% 50% 32% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.76 0.11 1.20 | 163 61 232 | 10 1 9 | / 16 8 8 / | 11 4 7 | -6 -7 +1 | 70% 50% 83% | 101 37 144 | 30% 17% 32% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.18 1.09 1.32 | 273 297 238 | 19 12 7 | / 16 12 4 / | 3 2 1 | +3 0 +3 | 85% 92% 75% | 160 166 150 | 22% 26% 19% | 3 3 0 | 3 2 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.00 1.04 0.93 | 213 239 175 | 15 10 5 | / 15 10 5 / | 6 3 3 | 0 0 0 | 80% 75% 88% | 140 165 103 | 20% 20% 19% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.60 1.20 | 172 109 268 | 12 4 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -6 +2 | 70% 67% 75% | 106 74 153 | 30% 40% 25% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.73 0.42 1.20 | 164 111 243 | 11 4 7 | / 17 11 6 / | 9 4 5 | -6 -7 +1 | 75% 75% 75% | 109 67 173 | 23% 21% 23% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.32 0.40 0.20 | 81 119 27 | 5 5 0 | / 17 11 6 / | 6 3 3 | -12 -6 -6 | 70% 67% 75% | 57 80 24 | 14% 19% 0% | 0 0 0 | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.94 1.21 1.50 | 264 307 235 | 22 10 12 | / 9 3 6 / | 2 0 2 | +13 +7 +6 | 80% 100% 67% | 163 185 149 | 23% 30% 19% | 4 3 1 | 4 1 3 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
1.60 1.41 1.49 | 268 265 271 | 18 6 12 | / 10 4 6 / | 9 5 4 | +8 +2 +6 | 80% 88% 75% | 162 168 159 | 20% 11% 27% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.14 1.25 1.21 | 240 238 242 | 18 7 11 | / 13 6 7 / | 9 4 5 | +5 +1 +4 | 85% 75% 92% | 162 167 158 | 31% 32% 30% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.41 1.25 0.91 | 187 103 244 | 13 3 10 | / 14 6 8 / | 4 0 4 | -1 -3 +2 | 65% 38% 83% | 105 59 137 | 35% 50% 32% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.11 1.20 0.76 | 163 61 232 | 10 1 9 | / 16 8 8 / | 11 4 7 | -6 -7 +1 | 70% 50% 83% | 101 37 144 | 30% 17% 32% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.32 1.18 | 273 297 238 | 19 12 7 | / 16 12 4 / | 3 2 1 | +3 0 +3 | 85% 92% 75% | 160 166 150 | 22% 26% 19% | 3 3 0 | 3 2 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.04 0.93 1.00 | 213 239 175 | 15 10 5 | / 15 10 5 / | 6 3 3 | 0 0 0 | 80% 75% 88% | 140 165 103 | 20% 20% 19% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.60 1.20 0.84 | 172 109 268 | 12 4 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 4 3 1 | -4 -6 +2 | 70% 67% 75% | 106 74 153 | 30% 40% 25% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.42 1.20 0.73 | 164 111 243 | 11 4 7 | / 17 11 6 / | 9 4 5 | -6 -7 +1 | 75% 75% 75% | 109 67 173 | 23% 21% 23% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.40 0.20 0.32 | 81 119 27 | 5 5 0 | / 17 11 6 / | 6 3 3 | -12 -6 -6 | 70% 67% 75% | 57 80 24 | 14% 19% 0% | 0 0 0 | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 |
Sonatine [#13]This underlines what N4RRATE said... Challengers is def. higher in the "list" than GC.
And also why some things that happen in GC are questionable.
How’s that even a discussion obviously challengers is a higher level than gc
Sonatine [#13]This underlines what N4RRATE said... Challengers is def. higher in the "list" than GC.
And also why some things that happen in GC are questionable.
I thought everyone knew that. GC is a lower level.
Sonatine [#13]This underlines what N4RRATE said... Challengers is def. higher in the "list" than GC.
And also why some things that happen in GC are questionable.
obviously. there are 0 GC teams in challengers
filter [#16]How’s that even a discussion obviously challengers is a higher level than gc
You guys would wonder how many comments on YT etc. there are that GC players (we know the names) would destroy Challengers and could easily play Tier 1.
I mean there are full YT videos by glazers (actual influencers) who say flor is the best duelist in the world... xD