mada = mada
2mada+2mada=4mada
2mada + 2mada = 4mada - 9/2mada + 9/2mada
= √((4mada - 9/2mada)²) + 9/2mada
= √(16mada² - 2∙4mada∙(9/2mada) + (9/2mada)²) + 9/2mada
= √(16mada² - 36mada² + (9/2mada)²) + 9/2mada
= √(-20mada² + (9/2mada)²) + 9/2mada
= √(25mada² - 45mada² + (9/2mada)²) + 9/2mada
= √((5mada - 9/2mada)²) + 9/2mada
= 5mada - 9/2mada + 9/2mada
= 5mada.
So 5mada = 4mada
5mada-4mada =0
mada = 0
Hence mada is zero and doesn't exist .
cloudberry [#3]When I make these jokes, I get downvoted and called an NPC :(
i upvote you king don't worry
cloudberry [#3]When I make these jokes, I get downvoted and called an NPC :(
you should check discord before i get in between your buttcheeks
This whole thing falls apart because of a stupid mistake with the square root and signs. When you get to (4x - (9/2)x)^2, you’re assuming you can just take the square root and keep everything real. But squaring hides any negatives, so if the stuff inside goes negative, you’d end up with imaginary numbers, not real ones.
When you expand (4x - (9/2)x)^2, it actually gives you a negative under the square root — not allowed if you’re sticking to real numbers. So, saying it all magically equals 5x is, simply stupid.
While i do understand this is a joke I have to say, its a bad one
K4ziuHa [#8]This whole thing falls apart because of a stupid mistake with the square root and signs. When you get to (4x - (9/2)x)^2, you’re assuming you can just take the square root and keep everything real. But squaring hides any negatives, so if the stuff inside goes negative, you’d end up with imaginary numbers, not real ones.
When you expand (4x - (9/2)x)^2, it actually gives you a negative under the square root — not allowed if you’re sticking to real numbers. So, saying it all magically equals 5x is, simply stupid.
While i do understand this is a joke I have to say, its a bad one
nerd
K4ziuHa [#8]This whole thing falls apart because of a stupid mistake with the square root and signs. When you get to (4x - (9/2)x)^2, you’re assuming you can just take the square root and keep everything real. But squaring hides any negatives, so if the stuff inside goes negative, you’d end up with imaginary numbers, not real ones.
When you expand (4x - (9/2)x)^2, it actually gives you a negative under the square root — not allowed if you’re sticking to real numbers. So, saying it all magically equals 5x is, simply stupid.
While i do understand this is a joke I have to say, its a bad one
Nerd
K4ziuHa [#8]This whole thing falls apart because of a stupid mistake with the square root and signs. When you get to (4x - (9/2)x)^2, you’re assuming you can just take the square root and keep everything real. But squaring hides any negatives, so if the stuff inside goes negative, you’d end up with imaginary numbers, not real ones.
When you expand (4x - (9/2)x)^2, it actually gives you a negative under the square root — not allowed if you’re sticking to real numbers. So, saying it all magically equals 5x is, simply stupid.
While i do understand this is a joke I have to say, its a bad one
nerd
n1cf [#5]you should check discord before i get in between your buttcheeks
uhhh i wanna say something very bad
K4ziuHa [#8]This whole thing falls apart because of a stupid mistake with the square root and signs. When you get to (4x - (9/2)x)^2, you’re assuming you can just take the square root and keep everything real. But squaring hides any negatives, so if the stuff inside goes negative, you’d end up with imaginary numbers, not real ones.
When you expand (4x - (9/2)x)^2, it actually gives you a negative under the square root — not allowed if you’re sticking to real numbers. So, saying it all magically equals 5x is, simply stupid.
While i do understand this is a joke I have to say, its a bad one
Bird
K4ziuHa [#8]This whole thing falls apart because of a stupid mistake with the square root and signs. When you get to (4x - (9/2)x)^2, you’re assuming you can just take the square root and keep everything real. But squaring hides any negatives, so if the stuff inside goes negative, you’d end up with imaginary numbers, not real ones.
When you expand (4x - (9/2)x)^2, it actually gives you a negative under the square root — not allowed if you’re sticking to real numbers. So, saying it all magically equals 5x is, simply stupid.
While i do understand this is a joke I have to say, its a bad one
So what you're saying is mada doesn't exist AND he's imaginary??
localkoolkid [#19]erm acthually anything raised to 0 is 1, so it would just be mada 🤓🤓🤓
Wtf brain stroke
KyLZi [#15]if this is the case then mada is nothing and we know nothing is perfect. this must mean mada is perfect?
someone cooked here
cloudberry [#3]When I make these jokes, I get downvoted and called an NPC :(
I laughed at madaunderrated yesterday ngl
BoringGuy [#27]This is the funniest thread I've ever seen on vlr, good job I'm dying
I'm dying
Thanks for the easy kill . Or does it count as assist
n1cf [#5]you should check discord before i get in between your buttcheeks
wish it was me
(i was peer pressured to say this)
Discord