So yes, kang kang absolutely had a great champs and was obviously the finals mvp, how can he be the best player of the tournament if TWO of his teammates played better than him in like 5 other matches?
A tournament isn’t just the finals, no matter how impressive his finals performance is imo
6
Zmjjkk MVP of champs?
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
I'll agree, i'm not hear to say KK was the best player throughout the whole tournament, and if we were awarding an mvp based on full tournament, treating all games equally, I'd give it to chichoo. But there is a reason they wait till after GF's to award the MVP, because everyone voting and everyone watching knows that game is more important than all the others. The fact KK played like that in one of the closest series all year, meaning had he played even a tad bit less out of his mind, they would have lost... if that doesn't warrant an MVP than idk lol. That's all I'll say on this, I appreciate the good debate though.
Discord