well throughout the whole year their are 6 tournaments. obviously they didnt win all 6 tournaments thoughout the year so at some points they weren't the best. If we look at the overall year they've definitely achieved the most by winning the most titles. just remember 3 regionals < 2 masters < 1 champs. im taking the 2024 team that won 3 regionals and 1 champs over a 1 masters 2 regionals team
0
Best team of 2024
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
idk how you believe that the VCT valorant champions tour has a masters equal to a champions. masters winners literally award champions points in which EDG still had the most of. Theres 17 masters winners and 4 champions winners. Do you think that the nbas mid season tournament is equivalent to the nba championship or msi is equal to worlds?
Explain this: how is a team winning champions better than a team winning a masters (considering both are at their tourney winning form) I agree that champs is more important due to the venue, the fact that it’s the big tournament of the year, and the prize money, but that doesn’t mean that it’s any more of a win. Teams play as hard to win during a masters, and just because there aren’t as many rewards shouldn’t discredit their win (only case where you can argue an exception is Madrid, as there were only 8 teams)
I DO believe winning a champions title is more important for a team, as it is the biggest and last tournament of the year, but that doesn’t mean that a team that wins champs is any better than a team winning a masters.
If we’re looking at Edg at their peak (champs) vs suppose Gen G at their peak (Shanghai) the fact that edg won champs doesn’t make them better in any way. Sure, it might make them more important, but it’s not a valid reason to argue that they are better whatsoever
Discord