do you think they make any changes, or do they trust the process and keep the same roster for a longer time
Simp4S0m [#4]If you get bilibili’d it’s a sign that the team is shit and needs a change
yeah very good insight
Hades_Loves_Rb [#6]100% keeping Keznit/Heat
80% keeping Shyy/Melser
15% keeping MTA
mta reason they in champs
Only viable change I can see is nzr for Melser.
I been following MTA since last year and his ceiling is really high.
Heat and Shyy have insane firepower and have shown they can carry games by themselves. Maybe a role swap? Shyy was a goated initiator when he played on Lev. Superb Skye and Fade player, his Viper is good too. Heat has cracked aim and can learn any role.
Keznit obviously is not only KRu best player, but the most valuable LATAM player along with Kingg.
Melser is not bad, but it's been 2 years and if they get grouped a change is needed.
Nzr is the best IGL available for LATAM teams, he made Furia look decent. Before he got signed I'd say Furia was worse than MIBR, DFM and Bleed. Thanks to him they avoided going winless this season.
kalayav_n [#7]mta reason they in champs
ok but they will look to make upgrades and hes 100% the weak link. 1/2 good maps doesnt excuse a terrible split performance (same way apoth will be dropped from EG despite having a life game and beating SEN)
Hades_Loves_Rb [#11]ok but they will look to make upgrades and hes 100% the weak link. 1/2 good maps doesnt excuse a terrible split performance (same way apoth will be dropped from EG despite having a life game and beating SEN)
you cant compare apoth who literally has 3 years scrimming and playing in official tournaments with tier 1 teams to mta who started last year online on a region where the only tier 1 player he faced is adverso and has currently played 5 matches against tier 1 teams for the first time ever on LAN and pulls clutches on a role he doesnt even mains saving his team´s year on a miracle 3 clutch rounds in a row
Simp4S0m [#4]If you get bilibili’d it’s a sign that the team is shit and needs a change
we should trust this guy, he has first hand experience
Simp4S0m [#4]If you get bilibili’d it’s a sign that the team is shit and needs a change
But what if they get worse?
Making changes after losing to Bilibili doesn’t always work..
Phanification [#14]ur the lowest iq kru fan there is. please wash ur face and wake up. kru aint winning nothing
same as 100thieves 2-1 2 -1
serverman [#15]But what if they get worse?
Making changes after losing to Bilibili doesn’t always work..
It will if you keep your best players
kalayav_n [#7]mta reason they in champs
Are they really any better with mta though?
They had to beat a washed 100T to qualify this time instead of G2 or LEV at Shanghai. I think they would've qualified with Klaus too.
mta doesn't fix their biggest problem which is that they struggle to adapt and keep strong mental after losing momentum
bees [#19]Are they really any better with mta though?
They had to beat a washed 100T to qualify this time instead of G2 or LEV at Shanghai. I think they would've qualified with Klaus too.
mta doesn't fix their biggest problem which is that they struggle to adapt and keep strong mental after losing momentum
no i don't think they are better with MTA, the problem with KRU is gameplan and gamestyle wise. it has nothing to do with the players, they need to completely revamp their whole structure and its very hard to do as not many latam coaches and idk if KRU will actually want a good coach
kalayav_n [#20]no i don't think they are better with MTA, the problem with KRU is gameplan and gamestyle wise. it has nothing to do with the players, they need to completely revamp their whole structure and its very hard to do as not many latam coaches and idk if KRU will actually want a good coach
Exactly. So how can you claim mta is the reason they're in champs? I'll believe it if they make playoffs but right now it seems like they win by raw frags against less-than-top-tier teams.
bees [#21]Exactly. So how can you claim mta is the reason they're in champs? I'll believe it if they make playoffs but right now it seems like they win by raw frags against less-than-top-tier teams.
because he single handedly fucking backpack carried them to a win vs 100t? are we just gonna ignore that game?
kalayav_n [#22]because he single handedly fucking backpack carried them to a win vs 100t? are we just gonna ignore that game?
But he hard bot frags with negative FK-FD in most other games. He might not have needed to clutch so badly if Kru weren't down so hard to begin with by having a comfortable and experienced initiator.
I get that he's still new to the scene and needs time to cook, but if they make changes at all it seems like such a gamble to keep him instead of signing someone like nzr
bees [#23]But he hard bot frags with negative FK-FD in most other games. He might not have needed to clutch so badly if Kru weren't down so hard to begin with by having a comfortable and experienced initiator.
I get that he's still new to the scene and needs time to cook, but if they make changes at all it seems like such a gamble to keep him instead of signing someone like nzr
well the 100t was where if they won they made champs and if they didnt they wouldnt have made champs and guess what, MTA carried them so they are the reason he is at champs...? why are we arguing about this.
kalayav_n [#24]well the 100t was where if they won they made champs and if they didnt they wouldnt have made champs and guess what, MTA carried them so they are the reason he is at champs...? why are we arguing about this.
Because that's not convincing proof the team is better for it. What good is winning off of hero plays in one game if they bomb out of groups as soon as they qualify anyway due to the same issues they've always had?
Again I see that he has potential but I don't understand why we're assuming that Kru qualifying is proof that he'll stick around. They could be planning anything.