ButterflyEffect Come

#1

DBStudios

Before I say anything this post is not here to talk about the assumptions that have been happening with the DRX situation nor am I taking sides on the matter I’m just waiting for a response from the big dogs at DRX before accusing people.

I just wanted to ask, you recently made a post saying that you have came into contact with the person who started all of this and they said that the person who did this to them had already qualified for champs. Now reading this I was hella confused because this is the second time where the person didn’t try to pin the blame on anyone and instead tried to keep it anonymous which in this stage just doesn’t seem right. (I could always be wrong and there could be a hundred different reasons why the person didn’t just straight up say who did it but that’s just me).

Below is just thoughts that I had in the situation:

First is obvious the person might be embarrassed that it happened and didn’t want to expose the person despite it being already so deep in (from what I think pretty strange)
The person who made the accusations simply just doesn’t know who did it which would also be kind of weird because it would be pretty obvious no? There’s 5 people on the team.
Last one I could think of is the person literally doesn’t know what they are talking about, just created some random scenario in the hope of trying to take down a DRX member or just tried to bring down their mental (because of hatred or whatever).

Now I could always be wrong as I think I know about like 80% of the story and could have always forgotten something so correct me if I’m wrong.

#2

geospliced

-3

Frags

+

–

Maybe they’re waiting for the (alleged) perpetrator to admit their crimes (alleged) to avoid becoming a victim to unfair lawmaking.

#3

nobody___100

8

Frags

+

–

lemme fix

(Allegedly) Maybe they’re (alleged) waiting for the (alleged) perpetrator to (allegedly) admit their crimes (alleged) to avoid becoming a (alleged) victim to (allegedly) unfair lawmaking (alleged).

#4

geospliced

-2

Frags

+

–

🤣🤣🤣

#5

7whanzussjwbsysbbejskaoao

2

Frags

+

–

W statement

#6

IonlywatchvcjXD

6

Frags

+

–

Tbh just wait till 27th (roster lock date) , if there's no news from drx then the girl is just talking straight from bullshittown

#11

DBStudios

5

Frags

+

–

Yeah I’m just waiting for a response from the higher ups but then again the damage has already basically been done. If the accusations are false then just imagine the players since not only will they have to have the thought of “this teammate might be a criminal” in the back of their minds but the players might also be worried that they will be charged with something they aren’t guilty of and pressure from the community.

#7

merciless-pity8989-89

5

Frags

+

–

The person mentioned that they didn’t say a name bc defamation laws in korea are strict.

Even if the statements were true, you can still be sued for defamation if the purpose was to slander one’s name.

What i find interesting is that she didn’t slander a single person name, so I doubt saying his name could actually land her in a lawsuit, but it’s possible she’s just being extra careful

#8

IonlywatchvcjXD

2

Frags

+

–

But she's giving away clues no? What is she even waiting for anyway?

#9

merciless-pity8989-89

4

Frags

+

–

she said she was looking for an apology and for him to be kicked off the team

#10

IonlywatchvcjXD

4

Frags

+

–

From what I can see she's trying to gain a leverage on drx, there's not even a guarantee that all this really is true.

Flame me for this , but she's just as clumsy as whoever she's sleeping with the moment both of them consented to this.

#17

merciless-pity8989-89

1

Frags

+

–

yeah, it can def be seen this way. And honestly, if DRX or flashback came out and said something along these lines. This entire issue would just be seen as 18 year olds making stupid decisions. Especially since nothing was “forced” and it “seems” accidental. Issue would be fine, and everything would be fine given time.

#12

DBStudios

4

Frags

+

–

I can understand this but it’s just that the timing of the accusations couldn’t be anymore perfect for someone trying to ruin DRX and their chances at champs, the fact that this person just sounds like they have zero idea who they are talking about and are just making stuff up on the fly based on what’s given to them, and the punishment that they think this person should be given. Then again I could always be wrong about this since this situation is pretty serious if it’s true but that’s just what I think about it and because I’m also not Korean.

#13

IonlywatchvcjXD

3

Frags

+

–

Nah this has to be like what you see from dramas shows, she's trying to get revenge on those who wronged her (allegedly).

The timing is just too perfect.

#14

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

Yeah just seems way to convenient especially since this season has been ups and downs for DRX fans after the roster changes but then again we shouldn’t take sides on it just yet till a statement has been released.

#15

IonlywatchvcjXD

2

Frags

+

–

Yeah you're right I guess I'm starting to lean on one side

#16

WhoseTao

0

Frags

+

–

The timing could be intentional, and even then it wouldnt undermine the possibility of SA. Just because it all sounds too convenient doesnt mean you can rule it all out. People are vindicitive after all.

Nothing clear has been shown yet, from either sides, so better to just sit still and wait instead of theory crafting on the absolute bare minimum chunks of information you have.

Also, if the victim simply does not have enough proof, or any proof, by accusing them at such a pivotal time, they can force DRX to make a big move, like kicking them off the roster IF there is no equivalent way to prove innocence (which shouldnt be the case if he is innocent).

I just hope this doesnt affect Foxy9, Buzz and Mako.

#18

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

The convenience of this entire thing has nothing to do with the original post nor am I choosing a side to defend. Those were just thoughts that connected to what other people were talking about. I’m simply just asking ButterflyEffect why she hasn’t just straight up said who did it because he has been in contact with them since it would make the case much easier if they really want the removal of this player from the team. (Got one answer but hoped to get more).

#19

WhoseTao

0

Frags

+

–

Oh sorry, I didnt mean you exactly, I just mean anyone who is going to theorize and blow it out of proportions, my bad.

#20

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

Oh all good I thought you were just reading my other posts and bringing them into the conversation instead of the original post.

#21

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

Bump since no response

#22

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

I have to bump this again sorry mods tryna get an answer

#23

ButterflyEffect23

0

Frags

+

–

i can answer your questions here or in dms

i already said multiple times that I've contacted the supposed victim MYSELF and asked the question about this alleged perpetrator qualifying for Champs. she confirmed it

#24

DBStudios

2

Frags

+

–

Answering it here or in the other post I created would be the best, also what you said has nothing to do with anything related to the original post (sorry if that came off a little bit aggressive). I was asking if you knew why she is still keeping the name anonymous as I would assume you knew the Korean law better than I do and most people here do and wanted some answers to that.

#26

ButterflyEffect23

0

Frags

+

–

she's keeping the name anonymous due to the possibility of her being sued due to the Korean defamation laws. by the way, she's gonna make another post(presumably calling names), see for yourself - https://x.com/csqix66/status/1816516842162434098?t=AqegF4k7OjI5VkJFoRzgFQ&s=19

#27

DBStudios

2

Frags

+

–

Correct me if I'm wrong but if the group being accused is small enough then the Korean defamation law will still be taken place no? (5 person roster btw pretty small) I don't understand it fully but that's what I found from researching the law personally. So wouldn't that mean that the fact that she accused the DRX roster and is basically narrowing it down would result in the defamation law no matter what? So why is she still hiding it this deep into the situation?

#28

ButterflyEffect23

0

Frags

+

–

As far as I'm aware, defamation laws come into play when you straight up call a name or accuse anyone, but I'm not sure.

In her recent post she mentioned that she's gonna name out the said person.

I don't live in Korea now, so I don't have 100% perception of how their laws work.

#29

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

Oh I thought this would be like clock work for you since I thought you were currently in Korea lmao but all good. From what I saw the group thing is true but then again that could either be outdated or just completely false and just wanted to check in with it. I still think though that its true tho because like if you accuse a 3-5 person group and said someone in it did something really bad then it would be pretty easy way to avoid the defamation law while basically hinting who did it.

#30

ButterflyEffect23

0

Frags

+

–

That seems like an easy way of getting around the defamation law, but since I don't have 100% perception of Korean laws(I moved out when I was a kid), I can't say for sure.

I'd say let's just wait for her next statement, since she said that she's gonna call names

#34

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

It's all good shouldn't have expected you to be like a total lawyer and shi lol but yeah that's what I've been doing just waiting for a response, but after what DRX came out with whatever she's been saying just doesn't line up and seems like another case of false accusations and her just not knowing what she's talking about but let's see.

#25

charleser

1

Frags

+

–

b0tt0rfly0ff0ct

#31

shroudcsgon

0

Frags

+

–

https://x.com/csqix66/status/1796130833910075567?s=46 i found this on reddit so is the alleged victim younger or older than flash back

#32

ZekaTheGoat

0

Frags

+

–

Few months younger apparently

#33

DBStudios

0

Frags

+

–

From what I've heard the person said they were a minor but that doesn't line up with evidence that other people have found and people are saying that she was over 18 at the time of when this all happened. But she is younger by a bit than flashback (if he's even the alleged person).

#35

shroudcsgon

0

Frags

+

–

but in this tweet she claims to be 19 which is older than flashback so either she is lying here or in her post