FPX 3-0 BLG (edg dont try and prob run 5 duelists in their games and lose)
(i do not know anything about CN besides those teams)
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
253 | 19 | / 16 / | 6 | +3 | 180 | 35% | 5 | 5 | 0 | |||
|
250 | 21 | / 13 / | 10 | +8 | 179 | 31% | 4 | 0 | +4 | |||
|
196 | 16 | / 14 / | 4 | +2 | 113 | 37% | 0 | 1 | -1 | |||
|
164 | 15 | / 12 / | 10 | +3 | 111 | 36% | 0 | 1 | -1 | |||
|
155 | 9 | / 15 / | 10 | -6 | 110 | 22% | 3 | 3 | 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
273 | 23 | / 15 / | 4 | +8 | 176 | 46% | 3 | 2 | +1 | |||
|
212 | 18 | / 14 / | 3 | +4 | 160 | 40% | 2 | 0 | +2 | |||
|
185 | 13 | / 15 / | 6 | -2 | 110 | 26% | 1 | 2 | -1 | |||
|
148 | 10 | / 19 / | 3 | -9 | 95 | 28% | 4 | 6 | -2 | |||
|
86 | 6 | / 17 / | 7 | -11 | 66 | 30% | 0 | 2 | -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
210 | 77 | / 69 / | 41 | +8 | 143 | 27% | 9 | 9 | 0 | |||
|
206 | 80 | / 75 / | 22 | +5 | 130 | 35% | 3 | 6 | -3 | |||
|
205 | 79 | / 68 / | 34 | +11 | 136 | 37% | 6 | 5 | +1 | |||
|
204 | 77 | / 82 / | 20 | -5 | 131 | 24% | 18 | 25 | -7 | |||
|
187 | 65 | / 79 / | 33 | -14 | 128 | 25% | 8 | 17 | -9 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
220 | 88 | / 75 / | 29 | +13 | 148 | 32% | 11 | 3 | +8 | |||
|
214 | 76 | / 80 / | 16 | -4 | 132 | 28% | 25 | 16 | +9 | |||
|
200 | 77 | / 76 / | 34 | +1 | 129 | 43% | 11 | 9 | +2 | |||
|
183 | 67 | / 69 / | 34 | -2 | 121 | 24% | 4 | 8 | -4 | |||
|
182 | 65 | / 78 / | 34 | -13 | 122 | 32% | 11 | 8 | +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
234 | 17 | / 15 / | 3 | +2 | 150 | 25% | 4 | 3 | +1 | |||
|
191 | 14 | / 19 / | 3 | -5 | 130 | 29% | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
|
182 | 15 | / 17 / | 6 | -2 | 114 | 28% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
|
167 | 11 | / 17 / | 4 | -6 | 115 | 35% | 1 | 6 | -5 | |||
|
130 | 8 | / 16 / | 3 | -8 | 96 | 27% | 2 | 1 | +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
344 | 26 | / 12 / | 6 | +14 | 223 | 30% | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
|
231 | 17 | / 14 / | 5 | +3 | 143 | 45% | 4 | 1 | +3 | |||
|
210 | 17 | / 14 / | 5 | +3 | 120 | 21% | 1 | 4 | -3 | |||
|
206 | 14 | / 14 / | 11 | 0 | 133 | 31% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
119 | 10 | / 11 / | 5 | -1 | 81 | 26% | 3 | 1 | +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
276 | 21 | / 11 / | 7 | +10 | 185 | 31% | 1 | 6 | -5 | |||
|
266 | 18 | / 10 / | 8 | +8 | 185 | 29% | 0 | 2 | -2 | |||
|
265 | 19 | / 12 / | 5 | +7 | 167 | 43% | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
|
222 | 17 | / 13 / | 12 | +4 | 147 | 31% | 1 | 0 | +1 | |||
|
123 | 8 | / 16 / | 6 | -8 | 79 | 19% | 2 | 4 | -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
213 | 14 | / 18 / | 3 | -4 | 130 | 23% | 8 | 3 | +5 | |||
|
209 | 13 | / 18 / | 6 | -5 | 146 | 38% | 2 | 2 | 0 | |||
|
205 | 17 | / 15 / | 2 | +2 | 135 | 30% | 3 | 0 | +3 | |||
|
182 | 10 | / 14 / | 12 | -4 | 133 | 22% | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
|
128 | 8 | / 18 / | 8 | -10 | 86 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
256 | 19 | / 18 / | 3 | +1 | 175 | 40% | 0 | 2 | -2 | |||
|
243 | 19 | / 17 / | 6 | +2 | 158 | 39% | 1 | 2 | -1 | |||
|
216 | 18 | / 18 / | 4 | 0 | 119 | 16% | 7 | 5 | +2 | |||
|
178 | 14 | / 19 / | 8 | -5 | 116 | 31% | 0 | 1 | -1 | |||
|
139 | 9 | / 20 / | 5 | -11 | 107 | 19% | 1 | 3 | -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
288 | 25 | / 17 / | 8 | +8 | 188 | 36% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
267 | 19 | / 17 / | 7 | +2 | 171 | 33% | 4 | 2 | +2 | |||
|
206 | 17 | / 15 / | 11 | +2 | 129 | 41% | 3 | 4 | -1 | |||
|
183 | 16 | / 13 / | 2 | +3 | 129 | 19% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
|
183 | 15 | / 17 / | 2 | -2 | 107 | 33% | 4 | 2 | +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
264 | 20 | / 10 / | 3 | +10 | 169 | 50% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
260 | 21 | / 15 / | 0 | +6 | 159 | 16% | 3 | 5 | -2 | |||
|
175 | 12 | / 14 / | 8 | -2 | 111 | 24% | 1 | 3 | -2 | |||
|
131 | 11 | / 14 / | 4 | -3 | 81 | 25% | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
|
124 | 7 | / 12 / | 12 | -5 | 86 | 21% | 1 | 3 | -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
229 | 17 | / 15 / | 9 | +2 | 149 | 34% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
190 | 14 | / 15 / | 5 | -1 | 123 | 24% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
180 | 11 | / 14 / | 2 | -3 | 107 | 27% | 7 | 3 | +4 | |||
|
164 | 12 | / 14 / | 6 | -2 | 109 | 34% | 1 | 2 | -1 | |||
|
156 | 11 | / 13 / | 9 | -2 | 114 | 31% | 1 | 1 | 0 |
I’ve seen enough from both teams at this point to be relatively confident about a 3-0 here.
I feel like FPX struggled to get past a Trace side that got curb-stomped by EDG so it isn’t too far fetched to hand the favorite status to EDG.
3-0 EDG should be what we see here but if FPX has the determination to make a good attempt at winning then we might see them take a map.
Change24 [#13]El Clásico of the Chinese League
I think El Clasico would be EDG vs BLG but this should definitely be considered a derby.
geospliced [#17]I think El Clasico would be EDG vs BLG but this should definitely be considered a derby.
nah its definitely FPX EDG, we've been seeing EDG vs FPX finals since the FPX ZHUQUE days in 2022, EDG BLG hasn't happened as much in comparison
Hydramizuj [#20]nah its definitely FPX EDG, we've been seeing EDG vs FPX finals since the FPX ZHUQUE days in 2022, EDG BLG hasn't happened as much in comparison
Fair enough, I didn’t account for FPX zhuque. Ig EDG vs BLG would be more like the North London derby or something. It’s happened as many times as EDG vs FPX (8 times not counting this series).
geospliced [#16]I’ve seen enough from both teams at this point to be relatively confident about a 3-0 here.
I feel like FPX struggled to get past a Trace side that got curb-stomped by EDG so it isn’t too far fetched to hand the favorite status to EDG.3-0 EDG should be what we see here but if FPX has the determination to make a good attempt at winning then we might see them take a map.
Good on them for winning a map
Makapichu [#40]This s1mon guy is trolling wtf. He is so bad
Without him there's no qualified initiator in CN.I have to say thanks to Simon for his picking the team back.
And nobody is the IGL now picking up haodong's job.
aspassonjiezounb [#44]Without him there's no qualified initiator in CN.I have to say thanks to Simon for his picking the team back.
And nobody is the IGL now picking up haodong's job.
But he trolled so hard in some rounds on the 4th map thats all Im saying