it's an honest question
0
What is the role of a coach in Valorant
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
ALoKi007 [#6]When things go wrong, they're the ones who have to explain why the plan failed without saying "because you didn't listen to me!"
I understand. Do you think the team's loss is the coach's responsibility?
GOINDEEP [#7]I understand. Do you think the team's loss is the coach's responsibility?
Well having a "good coach" and being practicing a lot and still having bad matches is just the indication that the coach is not good...
ALoKi007 [#8]Well having a "good coach" and being practicing a lot and still having bad matches is just the indication that the coach is not good...
bro is definitely talkin bout GE , I agree tho 💀👍
GOINDEEP [#9]I’d like to know what criteria you use to determine that a coach is a fraud
Not learning from mistakes,
Giving ur FRIENDS a spot in roster, even tho there r 100 more better plyrs out there
kamisavitar [#11]Not learning from mistakes,
Giving ur FRIENDS a spot in roster, even tho there r 100 more better plyrs out there
fuck it; me, kamisavitar and ALoKi007 are so right 😹
they take a map, work on ideas with assistent coach(es) then test them in reality with the team during scrims, see how well they do and work on new strats constantly
work on individuals in the team, work on their player's mental and physical skills, work on their form
they mostly are the ones that do anti and generally understand the game to the highest level, thats why you see things like potter timeouts which make the team look completely different and much, much better
very hard to see the positive impact of coaches other than people like engh, potter, ex6tenz, mini, solo etc but a bad or mediocre coach is always painfully obvious to see and very, very had to fix
kamisavitar [#11]Not learning from mistakes,
Giving ur FRIENDS a spot in roster, even tho there r 100 more better plyrs out there
partially understand. I hear stories like Dep strongly recommended Yuran at ZETA, but do coaches have 100% decisionmaking power over the roster?
GOINDEEP [#17]partially understand. I hear stories like Dep strongly recommended Yuran at ZETA, but do coaches have 100% decisionmaking power over the roster?
depends on the team, most of the team coaches are the teambuilders
Before the match: Devise team comps and strats for different maps and test them out against other teams (If they are tier 1 teams they'll usually scrim against decent T2 teams in the region). If the coach finds that the team struggles on a certain map they will select that as their permaban. They may also review VODs of the team they face up against, see how they play out certain maps, and devise strats to counter the enemy team (anti-stratting). They also usually serve as a counselor to maintain the players' physical and mental health to keep them in the best playing form.
During the match: Watches the gameplay and analyzes how both their team and the enemy team play out certain rounds. If they notice anything the players should capitalize on they'll call timeouts. Coaches also call timeouts to give the players a mental reset if the webcams show noticeable distress.
After the match: Review the VOD and spot out any errors in either IGL calling or timeout calling. This feedback is then applied to the next match.
On your question about fraud coaches, those kind of coaches will not call timeouts (Termi), put players on non-comfort roles (LEGIJA), allow permaban maps to go through (Chet), and overall puts the team at a strategic disadvantage.
GOINDEEP [#17]partially understand. I hear stories like Dep strongly recommended Yuran at ZETA, but do coaches have 100% decisionmaking power over the roster?
Yuran was part of Zeta Academy so it makes sense.
Most of the rosters have coaches say in roster building coz of their scouting, research and all.
Discord