Actually, many Japanese people reacting to his TWEET are similarly making discriminatory remarks. Makes me sick.

Your opinion focus on "enhancing the international competitiveness of Japanese players." But, the reason we support teams like ZETA and DFM is not because of nationality, right? It's because we know the players' personalities and backstories. (I don't deny that nationality can be a reason to support someone. It's just like any other reason.) so, even if my fav Yoshii steps up to Tier 1 and cooks ZETA, I should still be able to feel happy.

To be honest, I am in favor of this.
Reason
1: This is not the World Cup, so nationality and language have nothing to do with it.
2:There are many talented players in Far East Russia and OCE, and I believe it's unfair that they are denied opportunities simply because they are geographically distant. (Imagine if something and jemkin weren't in Tier 1.)
3:The success of high-level imported players is a reason for VCJ's popularity. (VCJ without import would become boring.)

sup:The changes such as "reducing import" and "standardizing nationality" completely ignore players without Tier 2 scenes in their home countries or those unable to participate in them.

He seems to be struggling to adapt. While he wasn't bad yesterday, the team continues to suffer defeats. After leaving ZETA, he took a break from Valorant for a while and on his stream, he mentioned, "Being a pro is tough," and "I feel weak right now." He seemed completely devoid of confidence. Currently, he is loaned to FL as a substitute for Derialy, so I think it's crucial for him to decide what he wants to do.

Why is it important whether it's half or not? I cannot agree with that suggestion

This is neither the World Cup nor the Olympics. Nationality doesn't matter at all. Anyway, I understand that u don't actually want to blame SZ. This criticism is directed towards the management of VCJ.

My heart skipped a beat. GGWP!

partially understand. I hear stories like Dep strongly recommended Yuran at ZETA, but do coaches have 100% decisionmaking power over the roster?

I’d like to know what criteria you use to determine that a coach is a fraud

I understand. Do you think the team's loss is the coach's responsibility?

blackwiz

it's an honest question

why? Is it simply a difference in skill levels, or something else?

Is There any presedent for this?