TENSTAR vs FNATIC
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.18 2.01 0.18 | 203 343 36 | 16 15 1 | / 15 6 9 / | 10 9 1 | +1 +9 -8 | 68% 92% 40% | 138 225 35 | 30% 33% 17% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.13 1.30 0.92 | 277 324 221 | 22 15 7 | / 19 11 8 / | 1 1 0 | +3 +4 -1 | 73% 83% 60% | 155 179 125 | 34% 30% 46% | 6 3 3 | 7 4 3 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.72 0.55 0.93 | 146 127 170 | 11 6 5 | / 17 10 7 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 73% 75% 70% | 96 82 112 | 18% 21% 15% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.62 0.66 0.57 | 153 167 137 | 10 6 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 2 2 0 | -7 -3 -4 | 50% 58% 40% | 110 119 100 | 33% 36% 29% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.37 0.50 0.21 | 94 141 38 | 6 5 1 | / 17 9 8 / | 2 2 0 | -11 -4 -7 | 50% 58% 40% | 66 98 28 | 13% 16% 0% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.77 1.79 1.75 | 269 168 355 | 21 7 14 | / 8 1 7 / | 13 6 7 | +13 +6 +7 | 77% 100% 58% | 190 127 244 | 26% 38% 22% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.28 1.46 1.14 | 268 270 266 | 19 9 10 | / 13 4 9 / | 7 4 3 | +6 +5 +1 | 82% 90% 75% | 158 156 160 | 26% 27% 24% | 3 2 1 | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.06 1.32 0.84 | 217 221 214 | 18 9 9 | / 15 4 11 / | 4 0 4 | +3 +5 -2 | 77% 90% 67% | 142 152 134 | 21% 24% 17% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.87 1.28 0.52 | 172 249 109 | 13 9 4 | / 14 5 9 / | 4 1 3 | -1 +4 -5 | 68% 70% 67% | 113 158 76 | 31% 30% 33% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.85 0.97 0.75 | 188 164 208 | 14 6 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | 68% 70% 67% | 117 120 115 | 38% 36% 38% | 6 1 5 | 3 1 2 | +3 0 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 1.02 1.22 | 206 257 143 | 52 34 18 | / 41 24 17 / | 22 13 9 | +11 +10 +1 | 75% 75% 74% | 139 167 106 | 33% 36% 30% | 2 1 1 | 6 4 2 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.86 1.60 1.20 | 273 225 326 | 63 27 36 | / 49 31 18 / | 10 8 2 | +14 -4 +18 | 72% 67% 77% | 159 137 184 | 20% 19% 22% | 21 9 12 | 15 9 6 | +6 0 +6 | |
|
0.78 1.27 1.01 | 200 173 234 | 45 19 26 | / 45 27 18 / | 13 7 6 | 0 -8 +8 | 70% 64% 77% | 144 127 164 | 25% 31% 21% | 4 0 4 | 2 2 0 | +2 -2 +4 | |
|
0.58 1.01 0.78 | 154 125 189 | 37 17 20 | / 48 28 20 / | 20 6 14 | -11 -11 0 | 75% 61% 90% | 109 81 142 | 17% 23% 14% | 4 1 3 | 9 7 2 | -5 -6 +1 | |
|
0.63 0.83 0.72 | 127 144 110 | 29 16 13 | / 45 28 17 / | 14 6 8 | -16 -12 -4 | 64% 58% 71% | 94 102 84 | 22% 22% 21% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.57 1.46 | 227 196 254 | 55 22 33 | / 36 19 17 / | 23 9 14 | +19 +3 +16 | 79% 81% 78% | 153 130 172 | 32% 33% 32% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.01 1.18 1.10 | 223 223 233 | 55 25 30 | / 46 22 24 / | 8 0 8 | +9 +3 +6 | 75% 74% 75% | 143 141 145 | 28% 31% 26% | 9 3 6 | 1 1 0 | +8 +2 +6 | |
|
0.59 1.24 0.94 | 190 132 239 | 40 12 28 | / 45 23 22 / | 19 8 11 | -5 -11 +6 | 66% 55% 75% | 128 89 162 | 22% 26% 21% | 4 2 2 | 11 6 5 | -7 -4 -3 | |
|
0.64 0.91 0.79 | 162 163 163 | 38 17 21 | / 47 25 22 / | 13 4 9 | -9 -8 -1 | 64% 58% 69% | 109 103 115 | 25% 28% 23% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.54 0.86 0.71 | 175 140 203 | 40 14 26 | / 52 25 27 / | 10 2 8 | -12 -11 -1 | 55% 45% 64% | 118 100 134 | 29% 42% 22% | 14 3 11 | 16 10 6 | -2 -7 +5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 1.42 1.80 | 263 275 248 | 22 12 10 | / 10 8 2 / | 7 3 4 | +12 +4 +8 | 90% 83% 100% | 182 178 188 | 29% 36% 23% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.39 1.10 1.78 | 313 267 376 | 22 9 13 | / 14 9 5 / | 8 6 2 | +8 0 +8 | 81% 67% 100% | 191 179 206 | 16% 8% 28% | 9 4 5 | 4 3 1 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
1.12 0.85 1.48 | 216 186 258 | 16 8 8 | / 14 9 5 / | 8 3 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 76% 67% 89% | 155 129 191 | 22% 29% 18% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.92 0.65 1.28 | 163 123 218 | 13 6 7 | / 12 8 4 / | 9 2 7 | +1 -2 +3 | 86% 75% 100% | 118 86 160 | 16% 21% 13% | 2 0 2 | 4 3 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.91 0.70 1.20 | 115 90 149 | 9 3 6 | / 11 8 3 / | 4 3 1 | -2 -5 +3 | 76% 58% 100% | 92 84 103 | 29% 20% 38% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.43 1.51 | 215 237 199 | 17 8 9 | / 13 8 5 / | 5 0 5 | +4 0 +4 | 71% 67% 75% | 138 133 142 | 40% 37% 43% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.79 0.46 1.04 | 205 151 246 | 15 4 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 1 4 | -3 -5 +2 | 57% 44% 67% | 143 108 169 | 21% 46% 14% | 4 1 3 | 5 3 2 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
0.74 0.05 1.27 | 169 74 242 | 12 1 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 2 2 0 | -5 -8 +3 | 52% 33% 67% | 120 60 165 | 19% 8% 23% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.61 0.35 0.79 | 130 153 114 | 8 4 4 | / 16 9 7 / | 2 0 2 | -8 -5 -3 | 57% 44% 67% | 91 103 83 | 31% 63% 21% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.56 0.14 0.87 | 140 76 189 | 9 2 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 6 1 5 | -9 -7 -2 | 57% 44% 67% | 95 45 132 | 20% 13% 22% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.26 0.83 1.70 | 230 165 297 | 19 5 14 | / 14 9 5 / | 3 2 1 | +5 -4 +9 | 83% 67% 100% | 166 134 198 | 23% 29% 20% | 4 0 4 | 1 1 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
1.10 0.18 2.03 | 229 83 377 | 19 3 16 | / 16 11 5 / | 1 1 0 | +3 -8 +11 | 63% 50% 75% | 134 52 215 | 12% 22% 9% | 6 2 4 | 4 2 2 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.92 0.71 1.13 | 152 152 153 | 14 7 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 5 1 4 | -2 -3 +1 | 67% 50% 83% | 101 100 103 | 44% 44% 44% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.88 0.69 1.07 | 171 201 142 | 14 8 6 | / 17 11 6 / | 8 1 7 | -3 -3 0 | 67% 58% 75% | 120 123 117 | 23% 32% 16% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.71 0.54 0.88 | 153 124 184 | 13 5 8 | / 19 10 9 / | 7 1 6 | -6 -5 -1 | 67% 33% 100% | 115 76 153 | 18% 29% 14% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.58 1.24 1.92 | 323 276 371 | 29 12 17 | / 15 9 6 / | 2 0 2 | +14 +3 +11 | 88% 83% 92% | 189 162 217 | 33% 32% 35% | 5 1 4 | 0 0 0 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
1.16 0.87 1.45 | 197 189 207 | 17 7 10 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 3 2 | +2 -3 +5 | 88% 75% 100% | 130 130 131 | 33% 28% 39% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.91 0.48 1.34 | 173 156 191 | 16 6 10 | / 15 11 4 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -5 +6 | 67% 58% 75% | 118 100 136 | 24% 31% 20% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.79 0.28 1.31 | 134 59 210 | 9 2 7 | / 15 10 5 / | 10 2 8 | -6 -8 +2 | 63% 42% 83% | 107 54 160 | 23% 50% 16% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.53 0.25 0.80 | 133 112 156 | 11 4 7 | / 19 11 8 / | 2 0 2 | -8 -7 -1 | 42% 25% 58% | 97 77 117 | 38% 42% 33% | 4 1 3 | 8 6 2 | -4 -5 +1 |
remehdise1 [#9]i'm 99% sure FNATIC are trying some new things out before LCQ, i wouldn't be suprised if this game is close or even a loss.
take your time to find your groove in the new meta, guys.
glhf
Finally someone objective. Yesterdays haven was an absolute example of this. It was 11-4/5, I'm not sure, they just decided, we won't lose like this and played stuff that is working. Than, in the end lost one round and overtime, this can happen in that long period of won rounds.
They are very strong individualy, they have an issue in adapting to enemy stuff. They know it and even said few times.
Boys, the hard work pays of. You're gonna smash LCQ.
Alwaysfnatic
DvyY [#10]Finally someone objective. Yesterdays haven was an absolute example of this. It was 11-4/5, I'm not sure, they just decided, we won't lose like this and played stuff that is working. Than, in the end lost one round and overtime, this can happen in that long period of won rounds.
They are very strong individualy, they have an issue in adapting to enemy stuff. They know it and even said few times.
Boys, the hard work pays of. You're gonna smash LCQ.
Alwaysfnatic
XD
remehdise1 [#9]i'm 99% sure FNATIC are trying some new things out before LCQ, i wouldn't be suprised if this game is close or even a loss.
take your time to find your groove in the new meta, guys.
glhf
lcq what are u saying fnatic in disqualified from champions that means fnatic is going to be able to play at the start of the new year
Glycoroldas [#17]"fnatic should be at berlin instead of g2"
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh bro wtf u have g2 shit and ur talking shit about the team that dosnt make any sense
DvyY [#10]Finally someone objective. Yesterdays haven was an absolute example of this. It was 11-4/5, I'm not sure, they just decided, we won't lose like this and played stuff that is working. Than, in the end lost one round and overtime, this can happen in that long period of won rounds.
They are very strong individualy, they have an issue in adapting to enemy stuff. They know it and even said few times.
Boys, the hard work pays of. You're gonna smash LCQ.
Alwaysfnatic
I kinda hope acend doesnt make it out of groups so we potentialy get liquid, fnc at champions
darksiders212 [#26]lcq what are u saying fnatic in disqualified from champions that means fnatic is going to be able to play at the start of the new year
No, they are even stilm in the run to make it by points. The reason u dont see them yet on the LCQ page is because acend has less points. If acend doesnt make it out of groups and g2/smb dont get exactly second than Fnatic quals by points
6vine [#18]Great comeback from FNC! And why is everyone acting as if Tenstar is a T3 team? They are a really good team and were unlucky to face Liquid early in the playoff qualifiers.
Ye tenstar is top 10 EMEA imo
darksiders212 [#27]hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh bro wtf u have g2 shit and ur talking shit about the team that dosnt make any sense
"liquid should be at berlin instead of g2"
ChowChow [#23]This comeback at 1st round is just crazy,
Either they just have a bad start game or the inconsistency is real.
Or they are trying new things, fnazic likes to experiment, I think they want as much game time as possible with the smallest amount of strat exposure
ChowChow [#23]This comeback at 1st round is just crazy,
Either they just have a bad start game or the inconsistency is real.
or maybe it's just the way EU play icebox
lots of notable icebox games are onesided
PrTsty [#29]No, they are even stilm in the run to make it by points. The reason u dont see them yet on the LCQ page is because acend has less points. If acend doesnt make it out of groups and g2/smb dont get exactly second than Fnatic quals by points
thank you for paying attention, PrTsty.
this darkside guy clearly watches too much AverageJOnas
HasosP [#39]Still better than liquid in my book
They did somehow won against Fnatic.
Still better than BBL.
Only thing u see is flairs
Letomori [#42]Ok, I'm removing my flair forever
It's not a team, it's a bunch of shitheads
LMAAOOOO
w1rk [#47]wasnt able to watch all games. was this more of tenstar performing or fnatic underperforming.
fnatic have been underperforming ever since they had their 3 weeks of vacation after Reykjavik
w1rk [#47]wasnt able to watch all games. was this more of tenstar performing or fnatic underperforming.
fnatic trying new comps as always, mistic on astra, boaster on viper, underperf from derke.. also tenstar are good gamers
Glycoroldas [#17]"fnatic should be at berlin instead of g2"
"They hated him because he spoke the truth"
6vine [#18]Great comeback from FNC! And why is everyone acting as if Tenstar is a T3 team? They are a really good team and were unlucky to face Liquid early in the playoff qualifiers.
Yeah, they also lost two times to Fnatic in Challengers 1 and 2. This time they deserved to win.
yungbasel [#54]At what point is it still "underperforming" when the team has come close but never actually won a tournament in valorant. Pretty much same with FPX. Pretty much the same with every team apart from SEN, who always seem to be able to stay afloat.
Nonsense. SEN have lower win ratio in Val tours than, say, ACEND. Get your stats straight.
PrTsty [#29]No, they are even stilm in the run to make it by points. The reason u dont see them yet on the LCQ page is because acend has less points. If acend doesnt make it out of groups and g2/smb dont get exactly second than Fnatic quals by points
liquid have a chance to make it to champion by points or not?
darksiders212 [#59]the fck are u sayin i dont even fkin know who the fck is this guy so stfu and fck off no fkin one gives u the right to talk here so fck off and who the fck u think ur self to talk to me u fkin dog shit
The hell?
darksiders212 [#60]liquid have a chance to make it to champion by points or not?
very very slight chance, much lesser than fnatic
cwietu [#56]Nonsense. SEN have lower win ratio in Val tours than, say, ACEND. Get your stats straight.
except SEN with every important tournament they play in. imbecile. who is even talking about acend here. deluded fnatic fan
darksiders212 [#59]the fck are u sayin i dont even fkin know who the fck is this guy so stfu and fck off no fkin one gives u the right to talk here so fck off and who the fck u think ur self to talk to me u fkin dog shit
lol u ok bro?
darksiders212 [#60]liquid have a chance to make it to champion by points or not?
Acend would have to get last at berlin and gambit would need to get first, and g2/smb wouldnt be allowed to get top 4
DvyY [#10]Finally someone objective. Yesterdays haven was an absolute example of this. It was 11-4/5, I'm not sure, they just decided, we won't lose like this and played stuff that is working. Than, in the end lost one round and overtime, this can happen in that long period of won rounds.
They are very strong individualy, they have an issue in adapting to enemy stuff. They know it and even said few times.
Boys, the hard work pays of. You're gonna smash LCQ.
Alwaysfnatic
Still there were some weird decisions in that Haven map vs SAW (haven't checked the TEN vod yet), like Magnum pushing out of a random smoke and dying, which is a bit of a concern. I hope the team can iron out basic fundamental mistakes, as that was something that gave Sentinels the edge in Masters.
I don't think anyone should comment on strats - if they feel some setup works well on a map (even the triple controller bind setup), that's their decision. I believe in the guys winning it out in LCQ! Or ACE, G2 and SMD not making out of Groups lmao
darksiders212 [#60]liquid have a chance to make it to champion by points or not?
I did the math, and this is how Team Liquid have a chance to qualify directly to Champions via circuit Points:
yungbasel [#63]except SEN with every important tournament they play in. imbecile. who is even talking about acend here. deluded fnatic fan
It doesn't matter kiddo, we're talking about winning any Val tournaments. And you said "every team" clown, so ACEND too. You don't even understand what you are saying, lol.
PrTsty [#31]sus
‼️‼️HOLY FUCKING 🖕👦 SHIT‼️‼️‼️‼️ IS THAT A MOTHERFUCKING 👩💞 AMONG 💰 US 🇺🇸 REFERENCE??????!!!!!!!!!!11!1!1!1!1!1!1 😱! 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱 AMONG 💑👨❤️👨👩❤️👩 US 👨 IS THE BEST 👌💯 FUCKING 💦🍆👀 GAME 🎮 🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯 RED 🔴 IS SO SUSSSSS 🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 COME 💦🏃🏃♀️ TO MEDBAY AND WATCH 👀 ME SCAN 👀 🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥 🏥🏥🏥🏥 WHY 😡🤔 IS NO ⚠🚫 ONE 1️⃣ FIXING 👾 O2 🅾 🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡 OH 🙀 YOUR 👉 CREWMATE? NAME 📛 EVERY 💯 TASK 📋 🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠 Where Any sus!❓ ❓ Where!❓ ❓ Where! Any sus!❓ Where! ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ Any sus 🌈🏳️🌈! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Where!Where!Where! Any sus!Where!Any sus 🌈🏳️🌈 Where!❓ Where! ❓ Where!Any sus❓ ❓ Any sus 💦! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Where! ❓ Where! ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Any sus 🌈🏳️🌈! ❓ ❓ Where!❓ Any sus 💦! ❓ ❓ Where!❓ ❓ Where! ❓ Where!Where! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Where! ❓ Where! Where!Any sus!Where! Where! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ I 👥 think 🤔 it was purple!👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀It wasnt me I 👁 was in vents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
6vine [#74]‼️‼️HOLY FUCKING 🖕👦 SHIT‼️‼️‼️‼️ IS THAT A MOTHERFUCKING 👩💞 AMONG 💰 US 🇺🇸 REFERENCE??????!!!!!!!!!!11!1!1!1!1!1!1 😱! 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱 AMONG 💑👨❤️👨👩❤️👩 US 👨 IS THE BEST 👌💯 FUCKING 💦🍆👀 GAME 🎮 🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯 RED 🔴 IS SO SUSSSSS 🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🕵️🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 COME 💦🏃🏃♀️ TO MEDBAY AND WATCH 👀 ME SCAN 👀 🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥🏥 🏥🏥🏥🏥 WHY 😡🤔 IS NO ⚠🚫 ONE 1️⃣ FIXING 👾 O2 🅾 🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡 OH 🙀 YOUR 👉 CREWMATE? NAME 📛 EVERY 💯 TASK 📋 🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠 Where Any sus!❓ ❓ Where!❓ ❓ Where! Any sus!❓ Where! ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ Any sus 🌈🏳️🌈! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Where!Where!Where! Any sus!Where!Any sus 🌈🏳️🌈 Where!❓ Where! ❓ Where!Any sus❓ ❓ Any sus 💦! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Where! ❓ Where! ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Any sus 🌈🏳️🌈! ❓ ❓ Where!❓ Any sus 💦! ❓ ❓ Where!❓ ❓ Where! ❓ Where!Where! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ ❓ Any sus!❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Where! ❓ Where! Where!Any sus!Where! Where! ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ I 👥 think 🤔 it was purple!👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀It wasnt me I 👁 was in vents!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂
whery?
latex [#71]I did the math, and this is how Team Liquid have a chance to qualify directly to Champions via circuit Points:
- Gambit (and no other EMEA team) HAS TO win Masters 3
- G2 and SMD cannot progress beyond quarterfinals (if either makes it to semis Liquid goes into LCQ)
- Acend have to lose both of their group games (if they win even a single game then Liquid goes to LCQ)
So basically liquid is going to lcq
cwietu [#73]It doesn't matter kiddo, we're talking about winning any Val tournaments. And you said "every team" clown, so ACEND too. You don't even understand what you are saying, lol.
I see English isn't your first language. So I'll let you re read what I wrote a few more times. And ifyou still don't understand it, then you should stay the fuck in school 🤡🤡🤡