Murash Gaming vs. FENNEL | Challengers League 2024 Japan: Split 2 | Main Stage | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
million MRSH	1.27 0.71 1.73	249 128 351	19 4 15	/ 14 6 8 /	11 3 8	+5 -2 +7	77% 60% 92%	158 90 214	24% 19% 25%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
Biju MRSH	1.22 1.36 1.09	189 159 214	16 6 10	/ 13 4 9 /	5 4 1	+3 +2 +1	73% 90% 58%	123 117 129	44% 70% 33%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
Absol MRSH	0.92 1.40 0.52	225 316 150	15 11 4	/ 19 9 10 /	8 3 5	-4 +2 -6	68% 80% 58%	165 219 119	28% 30% 25%	7 4 3	4 2 2	+3 +2 +1
Reita MRSH	0.88 1.15 0.65	228 279 186	16 10 6	/ 21 7 14 /	9 5 4	-5 +3 -8	86% 100% 75%	156 182 134	39% 40% 37%	4 2 2	1 1 0	+3 +1 +2
Tonbo MRSH	0.88 0.70 1.04	178 136 214	17 6 11	/ 15 7 8 /	1 0 1	+2 -1 +3	68% 70% 67%	117 92 138	36% 50% 31%	0 0 0	4 1 3	-4 -1 -3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

million

MRSH

1.27 0.71 1.73

249 128 351

19 4 15

/ 14 6 8 /

11 3 8

+5 -2 +7

77% 60% 92%

158 90 214

24% 19% 25%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

Biju

MRSH

1.22 1.36 1.09

189 159 214

16 6 10

/ 13 4 9 /

5 4 1

+3 +2 +1

73% 90% 58%

123 117 129

44% 70% 33%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

Absol

MRSH

0.92 1.40 0.52

225 316 150

15 11 4

/ 19 9 10 /

8 3 5

-4 +2 -6

68% 80% 58%

165 219 119

28% 30% 25%

7 4 3

4 2 2

+3 +2 +1

Reita

MRSH

0.88 1.15 0.65

228 279 186

16 10 6

/ 21 7 14 /

9 5 4

-5 +3 -8

86% 100% 75%

156 182 134

39% 40% 37%

4 2 2

1 1 0

+3 +1 +2

Tonbo

MRSH

0.88 0.70 1.04

178 136 214

17 6 11

/ 15 7 8 /

1 0 1

+2 -1 +3

68% 70% 67%

117 92 138

36% 50% 31%

0 0 0

4 1 3

-4 -1 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
GON FL	1.49 1.53 1.44	239 246 232	22 12 10	/ 13 7 6 /	5 4 1	+9 +5 +4	77% 83% 70%	169 178 158	36% 38% 33%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
TENNN FL	1.20 1.35 1.02	291 328 248	22 14 8	/ 18 10 8 /	3 1 2	+4 +4 0	77% 75% 80%	191 203 176	35% 38% 31%	3 2 1	2 1 1	+1 +1 0
Xdll FL	0.84 1.02 0.62	255 291 213	17 11 6	/ 22 12 10 /	9 5 4	-5 -1 -4	73% 75% 70%	170 198 136	43% 41% 47%	2 0 2	4 1 3	-2 -1 -1
SyouTa FL	0.77 0.65 0.90	142 127 162	11 5 6	/ 15 9 6 /	3 2 1	-4 -4 0	68% 50% 90%	102 100 105	31% 39% 17%	2 1 1	3 2 1	-1 -1 0
CLZ FL	0.72 0.76 0.67	131 159 99	9 6 3	/ 15 9 6 /	10 6 4	-6 -3 -3	77% 75% 80%	94 118 65	19% 19% 18%	1 1 0	4 3 1	-3 -2 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

GON

1.49 1.53 1.44

239 246 232

22 12 10

/ 13 7 6 /

5 4 1

+9 +5 +4

77% 83% 70%

169 178 158

36% 38% 33%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

TENNN

1.20 1.35 1.02

291 328 248

22 14 8

/ 18 10 8 /

3 1 2

+4 +4 0

77% 75% 80%

191 203 176

35% 38% 31%

3 2 1

2 1 1

+1 +1 0

Xdll

0.84 1.02 0.62

255 291 213

17 11 6

/ 22 12 10 /

9 5 4

-5 -1 -4

73% 75% 70%

170 198 136

43% 41% 47%

2 0 2

4 1 3

-2 -1 -1

SyouTa

0.77 0.65 0.90

142 127 162

11 5 6

/ 15 9 6 /

3 2 1

-4 -4 0

68% 50% 90%

102 100 105

31% 39% 17%

2 1 1

3 2 1

-1 -1 0

CLZ

0.72 0.76 0.67

131 159 99

9 6 3

/ 15 9 6 /

10 6 4

-6 -3 -3

77% 75% 80%

94 118 65

19% 19% 18%

1 1 0

4 3 1

-3 -2 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
million MRSH	0.79 1.49 1.17	233 131 317	35 8 27	/ 28 13 15 /	19 8 11	+7 -5 +12	75% 65% 83%	143 87 189	19% 21% 18%	2 0 2	3 1 2	-1 -1 0
Absol MRSH	1.26 1.08 1.16	258 278 242	37 19 18	/ 34 17 17 /	11 5 6	+3 +2 +1	77% 80% 75%	181 189 175	32% 29% 34%	11 4 7	8 6 2	+3 -2 +5
Biju MRSH	0.97 1.09 1.03	159 135 180	26 10 16	/ 25 12 13 /	10 5 5	+1 -2 +3	68% 65% 71%	108 108 108	35% 40% 33%	2 0 2	2 2 0	0 -2 +2
Tonbo MRSH	1.17 0.90 1.02	196 218 178	33 16 17	/ 27 13 14 /	3 1 2	+6 +3 +3	70% 70% 71%	121 135 110	35% 41% 30%	1 0 1	5 2 3	-4 -2 -2
Reita MRSH	0.84 0.98 0.91	203 204 203	31 15 16	/ 34 15 19 /	12 6 6	-3 0 -3	73% 65% 79%	137 130 142	31% 37% 27%	6 2 4	4 3 1	+2 -1 +3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

million

MRSH

0.79 1.49 1.17

233 131 317

35 8 27

/ 28 13 15 /

19 8 11

+7 -5 +12

75% 65% 83%

143 87 189

19% 21% 18%

2 0 2

3 1 2

-1 -1 0

Absol

MRSH

1.26 1.08 1.16

258 278 242

37 19 18

/ 34 17 17 /

11 5 6

+3 +2 +1

77% 80% 75%

181 189 175

32% 29% 34%

11 4 7

8 6 2

+3 -2 +5

Biju

MRSH

0.97 1.09 1.03

159 135 180

26 10 16

/ 25 12 13 /

10 5 5

+1 -2 +3

68% 65% 71%

108 108 108

35% 40% 33%

2 0 2

2 2 0

0 -2 +2

Tonbo

MRSH

1.17 0.90 1.02

196 218 178

33 16 17

/ 27 13 14 /

3 1 2

+6 +3 +3

70% 70% 71%

121 135 110

35% 41% 30%

1 0 1

5 2 3

-4 -2 -2

Reita

MRSH

0.84 0.98 0.91

203 204 203

31 15 16

/ 34 15 19 /

12 6 6

-3 0 -3

73% 65% 79%

137 130 142

31% 37% 27%

6 2 4

4 3 1

+2 -1 +3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
GON FL	1.18 1.16 1.17	210 210 211	34 18 16	/ 29 17 12 /	16 10 6	+5 +1 +4	73% 75% 70%	143 145 139	32% 33% 31%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
SyouTa FL	0.78 1.10 0.93	182 150 222	28 12 16	/ 30 18 12 /	3 2 1	-2 -6 +4	66% 50% 85%	119 103 139	33% 34% 32%	8 2 6	5 4 1	+3 -2 +5
Xdll FL	0.88 0.95 0.91	227 209 249	31 15 16	/ 38 21 17 /	11 5 6	-7 -6 -1	66% 58% 75%	153 149 159	32% 33% 31%	7 1 6	6 3 3	+1 -2 +3
TENNN FL	0.91 0.79 0.86	212 251 165	32 21 11	/ 36 22 14 /	6 1 5	-4 -1 -3	68% 63% 75%	137 150 121	39% 43% 32%	4 3 1	6 5 1	-2 -2 0
CLZ FL	0.76 0.92 0.83	150 145 156	22 11 11	/ 29 17 12 /	16 9 7	-7 -6 -1	77% 75% 80%	105 105 105	24% 26% 22%	2 1 1	5 4 1	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

GON

1.18 1.16 1.17

210 210 211

34 18 16

/ 29 17 12 /

16 10 6

+5 +1 +4

73% 75% 70%

143 145 139

32% 33% 31%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

SyouTa

0.78 1.10 0.93

182 150 222

28 12 16

/ 30 18 12 /

3 2 1

-2 -6 +4

66% 50% 85%

119 103 139

33% 34% 32%

8 2 6

5 4 1

+3 -2 +5

Xdll

0.88 0.95 0.91

227 209 249

31 15 16

/ 38 21 17 /

11 5 6

-7 -6 -1

66% 58% 75%

153 149 159

32% 33% 31%

7 1 6

6 3 3

+1 -2 +3

TENNN

0.91 0.79 0.86

212 251 165

32 21 11

/ 36 22 14 /

6 1 5

-4 -1 -3

68% 63% 75%

137 150 121

39% 43% 32%

4 3 1

6 5 1

-2 -2 0

CLZ

0.76 0.92 0.83

150 145 156

22 11 11

/ 29 17 12 /

16 9 7

-7 -6 -1

77% 75% 80%

105 105 105

24% 26% 22%

2 1 1

5 4 1

-3 -3 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Absol MRSH	1.40 1.12 1.64	290 240 333	22 8 14	/ 15 8 7 /	3 2 1	+7 0 +7	86% 80% 92%	198 159 231	35% 29% 40%	4 0 4	4 4 0	0 -4 +4
Tonbo MRSH	1.16 1.64 0.76	213 300 141	16 10 6	/ 12 6 6 /	2 1 1	+4 +4 0	73% 70% 75%	125 177 82	34% 38% 29%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
million MRSH	1.08 0.87 1.25	216 135 284	16 4 12	/ 14 7 7 /	8 5 3	+2 -3 +5	73% 70% 75%	128 84 164	14% 23% 12%	1 0 1	3 1 2	-2 -1 -1
Reita MRSH	0.95 0.53 1.30	178 128 220	15 5 10	/ 13 8 5 /	3 1 2	+2 -3 +5	59% 30% 83%	117 77 151	24% 31% 20%	2 0 2	3 2 1	-1 -2 +1
Biju MRSH	0.85 0.57 1.09	129 111 146	10 4 6	/ 12 8 4 /	5 1 4	-2 -4 +2	64% 40% 83%	92 98 87	28% 20% 32%	1 0 1	2 2 0	-1 -2 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Absol

MRSH

1.40 1.12 1.64

290 240 333

22 8 14

/ 15 8 7 /

3 2 1

+7 0 +7

86% 80% 92%

198 159 231

35% 29% 40%

4 0 4

4 4 0

0 -4 +4

Tonbo

MRSH

1.16 1.64 0.76

213 300 141

16 10 6

/ 12 6 6 /

2 1 1

+4 +4 0

73% 70% 75%

125 177 82

34% 38% 29%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

million

MRSH

1.08 0.87 1.25

216 135 284

16 4 12

/ 14 7 7 /

8 5 3

+2 -3 +5

73% 70% 75%

128 84 164

14% 23% 12%

1 0 1

3 1 2

-2 -1 -1

Reita

MRSH

0.95 0.53 1.30

178 128 220

15 5 10

/ 13 8 5 /

3 1 2

+2 -3 +5

59% 30% 83%

117 77 151

24% 31% 20%

2 0 2

3 2 1

-1 -2 +1

Biju

MRSH

0.85 0.57 1.09

129 111 146

10 4 6

/ 12 8 4 /

5 1 4

-2 -4 +2

64% 40% 83%

92 98 87

28% 20% 32%

1 0 1

2 2 0

-1 -2 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
SyouTa FL	1.09 0.92 1.30	222 173 283	17 7 10	/ 15 9 6 /	0 0 0	+2 -2 +4	64% 50% 80%	137 107 174	35% 29% 42%	6 1 5	2 2 0	+4 -1 +5
Xdll FL	0.99 0.75 1.27	199 128 286	14 4 10	/ 16 9 7 /	2 0 2	-2 -5 +3	59% 42% 80%	137 100 183	23% 22% 24%	5 1 4	2 2 0	+3 -1 +4
CLZ FL	0.95 0.75 1.18	168 132 212	13 5 8	/ 14 8 6 /	6 3 3	-1 -3 +2	77% 75% 80%	115 92 144	29% 38% 24%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
GON FL	0.85 0.83 0.88	180 173 189	12 6 6	/ 16 10 6 /	11 6 5	-4 -4 0	68% 67% 70%	116 113 121	27% 26% 28%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
TENNN FL	0.51 0.46 0.56	132 174 83	10 7 3	/ 18 12 6 /	3 0 3	-8 -5 -3	59% 50% 70%	83 97 66	50% 58% 38%	1 1 0	4 4 0	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

SyouTa

1.09 0.92 1.30

222 173 283

17 7 10

/ 15 9 6 /

0 0 0

+2 -2 +4

64% 50% 80%

137 107 174

35% 29% 42%

6 1 5

2 2 0

+4 -1 +5

Xdll

0.99 0.75 1.27

199 128 286

14 4 10

/ 16 9 7 /

2 0 2

-2 -5 +3

59% 42% 80%

137 100 183

23% 22% 24%

5 1 4

2 2 0

+3 -1 +4

CLZ

0.95 0.75 1.18

168 132 212

13 5 8

/ 14 8 6 /

6 3 3

-1 -3 +2

77% 75% 80%

115 92 144

29% 38% 24%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

GON

0.85 0.83 0.88

180 173 189

12 6 6

/ 16 10 6 /

11 6 5

-4 -4 0

68% 67% 70%

116 113 121

27% 26% 28%

0 0 0

TENNN

0.51 0.46 0.56

132 174 83

10 7 3

/ 18 12 6 /

3 0 3

-8 -5 -3

59% 50% 70%

83 97 66

50% 58% 38%

1 1 0

4 4 0

-3 -3 0

KlobotXXL

Frags

–

fenneru win not even close

Jeyit

Frags

–

Mrsh wins against sengoku

KlobotXXL

Frags

–

holy theyre washed af

poiuu20

Frags

–

fennel better win

xabyy7

Frags

–

2-0 MRSH

C310

Frags

–

Fennel did literally one roster change with TENNN and they look so much worse compared to Split1, how is that possible???

Hithxbye

Frags

–

Lmao Fennel ain't getting weaker, it's just Murash is getting stronger.

poiuu20

Frags

–

nah fennel with old roster would stomp those fraud

#16

TMosura

✔

Frags

–

Both things can be correct, you know. Fennel looked weaker, but Murash developed quite well considering last Split and last year.

#17

C310

Frags

–

What I don't get is that Fennel started playing some weird ass comps after TENNN joined, the players partly look uncomfortable and don't seem to understand their own gameplans.

#21

TMosura

✔

Frags

–

Either they have to compensate and wait for TENNN to be fully comfortable or they just look completely disjointed

#25

C310

Frags

–

Yeah it looks very disjointed, it reminds me a lot from when Guild tried to replace Russ with a on paper way better player and looked so much worse off afterwards.

#26

burritx

Frags

–

Yacine was horrible player and never looked better on paper than russ tbh

#27

C310

Frags

–

Historical revision just because of a bad performance in LCQ. He averaged like 1.13 rating and a 256acs Split in tier2 and never looked insanely bad before in tier1 also Russ was coming off from of the worst performances ever in an international. The problem was more of them wanting to have Twisten instead and Riot not allowing it last minute and them having zero practice together because of it.

#18

poiuu20

-1

Frags

–

yeah, tennn ain't weaker then derialy, but the chemistry are not it.

#12

arin2016

Frags

–

FENNEL making silly mistakes such as overaggressing as cypher when sage has a res is Murash getting stronger????

#22

Hithxbye

Frags

–

Lmao sounds butthurt af

#24

arin2016

Frags

–

But I asked you a question though which you still haven't answered.

#10

7whanzussjwbsysbbejskaoao

Frags

–

wtf are Fennel doing

#11

arin2016

Frags

–

WHAT THE FYCJK HAPPENED TO MY GLORIOUS TEAM

#13

AssistMaker

Frags

–

FENNEL COMP….fk

#14

C310

Frags

–

At this point get Derialy back and play the old comps, they look so much worse than what used to be. Also very well played by Murash their coaching staff is cooking some nice stuff

#15

Orik

Frags

–

Derialy died for this fraud T0NNN

#20

poiuu20

-1

Frags

–

derialy ain't better then tennn, but tennn ain't a replacement of tennn. he's some agressive type player and the chemistry are just not working well. I ain't saying tennn a fraud but he should've not play sentinel

#19

Diablo74

Frags

–

Murash on top

#23

sleeek

Frags

–

bruh wtf happened to fennel
im rooting for riddle now

#28

Derpp

Frags

–

F0NNEL kek
srsly bench tennn tho, he's terribly washed

#29

bhggjkl

Frags

–

Holy viewership

#30

2NaCl

Frags

–

Istg derialy was a better senti than tennn wtf