FSN ban Split; EXL ban Icebox; FSN pick Bind; EXL pick Lotus; FSN ban Sunset; EXL ban Breeze; Ascent remains
Betting
$100 on E-Xolos LAZER returned $310 at 3.10 pre-match odds
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Streams
Maps/Stats
All Maps
1 Bind
2 Lotus
3 Ascent
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
FSN
0
3 (0)
0 (0)
7 (3)
11 (5)
EXL
2
2 (2)
1 (1)
6 (2)
12 (8)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
(BANK)
FSN
EXL
(BANK)
1
0.4k
0.3k
2
6.8k
$$
2.1k
3
0.3k
$$
$$
12.8k
4
4.9k
$$$
$$$
2.5k
5
4.5k
$$$
$$
4.2k
6
12.3k
$$$
$$$
0.6k
7
3.9k
$$$
$$$
4.6k
8
7.3k
$$
$$$
9.4k
9
2.0k
$$$
$$$
16.1k
10
7.8k
$$
$$$
20.8k
11
1.8k
$$$
$$$
24.5k
12
6.2k
$$$
$$$
12.5k
(BANK)
FSN
EXL
(BANK)
13
0.1k
0.1k
14
2.1k
$$
$$
0.6k
15
7.5k
$$
$$
2.5k
16
9.5k
$$
$
7.7k
17
4.3k
$$
$$$
12.9k
18
8.9k
$$$
$$
7.9k
19
11.2k
$$$
$$$
1.5k
20
1.9k
$$$
$$$
8.7k
21
9.9k
$$$
$$$
2.6k
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
FSN
0
4 (0)
1 (0)
6 (2)
7 (3)
EXL
2
2 (2)
0 (0)
6 (5)
10 (6)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
(BANK)
FSN
EXL
(BANK)
1
0.3k
0.2k
2
8.7k
$$
0.3k
3
0.7k
$$$
$$
11.1k
4
8.3k
$
$$$
11.7k
5
2.9k
$$$
$$$
14.3k
6
7.0k
$$$
$$$
4.0k
7
3.7k
$$
$$$
8.2k
8
6.3k
$$
$$$
9.4k
9
1.5k
$$$
$$$
18.5k
10
4.5k
$$$
$$$
7.4k
11
2.9k
$$$
$$
6.1k
12
0.9k
$$
$$$
5.4k
(BANK)
FSN
EXL
(BANK)
13
0.3k
0.1k
14
5.8k
$$
2.4k
15
0.1k
$$
$$
9.1k
16
2.2k
$$
$$$
4.8k
17
0.7k
$$
$$$
9.8k
18
5.7k
$$$
$$
9.0k
Stats from this map are not available yet
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
FSN
0
7 (0)
1 (0)
13 (5)
18 (8)
EXL
4
4 (4)
1 (1)
12 (7)
22 (14)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
Head-to-head
Past Matches
Comments:
Hide Pre-match
Threaded Linear
#1
FusionLULW
-1
Frags
+

GO FUSION

#2
biozarro
2
Frags
+

LAZERRRRRR!!!!!!

#3
munestar
0
Frags
+

i thought FSN left val and dropped their male roster? or did I misinterpret their tweet

#4
El_Brujo
0
Frags
+

they got a new budget roster

#5
koromast
4
Frags
+

they only dropped the roster, they got 0 chances left to make ascension after an all of a sudden bo3 against 6k which they lost on a close match and then decided to let the team go F/A and go for a budget roster so they dont affect the players or the org´s budget

#6
Lenarp
3
Frags
+

the ex roster is 100 times better HAAH

#12
hellfire
0
Frags
+

that's just ex fusion lmao

#7
Chut1s
0
Frags
+

FS +2.5 MAP2

#8
Anguibok
0
Frags
+

It's the 2 historic team of LAN right ?
Reta is still favorite for the competition ?

PS : Wait a minutes... How could Reta play in LAS if they are from LAS ??

#9
koromast
3
Frags
+

latam has this rule where as long as you are a citizen from any latam country (except brazil because they have their own vcl) you can play on any of the 2 leagues, reta decided to build a roster with the most experienced players they could find murizz, nagz, delz1k, suther which is keznit´s close friend and pretty much his "master" since cs:go and snwzin which is a cracked br ranked talent, they could´ve went to LAS with this team but since on latam north the ping is good enough to scrim against franchised rosters they decided to stay in here

#10
Anguibok
2
Frags
+

Thanks !

So basically the plan is to take LAN scrim and LAS talent ? That's kinda smart but kinda sounds like a system abuse. It would be terrible is in long term if LAS good structure go to LAN, and making no way for LAN player to find a team...

#11
koromast
2
Frags
+

thats likely to happen but only because of the franchising system the same will most likely happen in apac since kr and cn are literally next to each other and other vcls are very far apart from there, the best solution would be to merge latam north and south and make a 12 teams vcl like NA with teams from north and south playing each other and also since the best of latam south will come to north the best players from north will improve way more

#13
Anguibok
1
Frags
+

So basically closing NA South ?

Also how does the group system works ? Since group A is basically upper group and group B is basically lower group shouldn't be the top 3 of last split ? (But 2 of the top 3 are in the group B)

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment