SEN Envy 2-0 SEN
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.50 1.06 1.94 | 333 253 415 | 29 12 17 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 3 2 | +12 +3 +9 | 67% 58% 75% | 190 142 239 | 19% 15% 21% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.22 0.99 1.45 | 271 239 305 | 23 9 14 | / 19 10 9 / | 4 2 2 | +4 -1 +5 | 75% 92% 58% | 177 155 198 | 31% 33% 30% | 8 5 3 | 2 1 1 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
1.12 1.12 1.11 | 192 178 208 | 16 7 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 6 4 2 | +2 -1 +3 | 67% 58% 75% | 118 120 117 | 33% 38% 29% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.62 0.81 0.44 | 149 194 105 | 14 9 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 0 4 | -2 +1 -3 | 58% 50% 67% | 92 125 60 | 14% 14% 13% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.54 0.75 0.34 | 97 127 67 | 7 5 2 | / 15 7 8 / | 3 2 1 | -8 -2 -6 | 54% 50% 58% | 65 96 34 | 28% 41% 8% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.19 1.14 1.23 | 217 215 219 | 18 9 9 | / 18 10 8 / | 7 3 4 | 0 -1 +1 | 75% 83% 67% | 159 163 155 | 32% 36% 28% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.07 0.80 1.34 | 182 146 218 | 13 5 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 14 7 7 | -4 -5 +1 | 71% 67% 75% | 131 120 143 | 26% 22% 30% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.99 1.12 0.87 | 200 222 179 | 17 9 8 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | 58% 67% 50% | 143 145 142 | 18% 13% 25% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.90 1.17 0.64 | 178 220 136 | 14 9 5 | / 17 8 9 / | 5 3 2 | -3 +1 -4 | 58% 67% 50% | 122 149 96 | 25% 23% 29% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.87 0.47 1.27 | 232 166 298 | 19 7 12 | / 19 10 9 / | 6 3 3 | 0 -3 +3 | 67% 50% 83% | 153 126 180 | 27% 30% 23% | 2 1 1 | 8 6 2 | -6 -5 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.24 1.24 | 226 208 244 | 40 19 21 | / 30 17 13 / | 11 6 5 | +10 +2 +8 | 67% 63% 71% | 138 132 143 | 30% 37% 25% | 6 4 2 | 4 2 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.90 1.41 1.15 | 271 226 316 | 45 20 25 | / 38 19 19 / | 13 7 6 | +7 +1 +6 | 65% 58% 71% | 156 133 178 | 18% 14% 21% | 3 0 3 | 7 5 2 | -4 -5 +1 | |
|
0.77 1.38 1.07 | 215 178 253 | 39 15 24 | / 37 21 16 / | 14 5 9 | +2 -6 +8 | 73% 75% 71% | 138 117 159 | 22% 23% 21% | 8 5 3 | 4 2 2 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.74 0.73 | 142 121 164 | 22 10 12 | / 32 15 17 / | 14 6 8 | -10 -5 -5 | 65% 63% 67% | 98 90 106 | 22% 26% 18% | 2 0 2 | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.71 0.57 0.64 | 152 183 121 | 26 15 11 | / 35 18 17 / | 9 3 6 | -9 -3 -6 | 52% 50% 54% | 81 93 69 | 16% 22% 9% | 3 1 2 | 7 3 4 | -4 -2 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.17 1.36 1.26 | 219 191 248 | 40 17 23 | / 32 19 13 / | 19 13 6 | +8 -2 +10 | 79% 79% 79% | 144 134 154 | 26% 26% 27% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.74 1.34 1.04 | 205 168 241 | 32 13 19 | / 34 20 14 / | 22 11 11 | -2 -7 +5 | 75% 71% 79% | 141 131 150 | 24% 20% 28% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.20 0.81 1.01 | 194 222 165 | 31 18 13 | / 33 16 17 / | 16 11 5 | -2 +2 -4 | 65% 63% 67% | 132 151 113 | 24% 21% 29% | 8 3 5 | 3 2 1 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
0.76 1.26 1.01 | 250 214 285 | 42 19 23 | / 38 21 17 / | 9 4 5 | +4 -2 +6 | 73% 63% 83% | 158 143 173 | 28% 30% 27% | 8 5 3 | 10 7 3 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.93 0.75 0.84 | 176 198 155 | 27 15 12 | / 35 18 17 / | 7 1 6 | -8 -3 -5 | 63% 63% 63% | 133 137 129 | 19% 16% 24% | 4 3 1 | 5 2 3 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 1.36 1.37 | 259 239 280 | 24 12 12 | / 16 9 7 / | 5 2 3 | +8 +3 +5 | 67% 67% 67% | 157 144 169 | 28% 36% 23% | 4 3 1 | 3 2 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.93 0.56 1.31 | 159 117 201 | 16 6 10 | / 18 11 7 / | 10 3 7 | -2 -5 +3 | 71% 58% 83% | 100 80 120 | 12% 12% 12% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.92 0.70 1.15 | 187 115 261 | 15 5 10 | / 17 8 9 / | 11 4 7 | -2 -3 +1 | 75% 75% 75% | 131 83 179 | 19% 14% 22% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.81 0.74 0.88 | 208 199 217 | 16 8 8 | / 21 10 11 / | 8 4 4 | -5 -2 -3 | 63% 58% 67% | 121 124 118 | 16% 13% 20% | 2 0 2 | 5 4 1 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
0.66 0.61 0.70 | 154 172 137 | 12 6 6 | / 19 10 9 / | 5 3 2 | -7 -4 -3 | 46% 50% 42% | 70 61 78 | 17% 35% 7% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.19 1.49 | 221 166 276 | 22 8 14 | / 14 9 5 / | 12 10 2 | +8 -1 +9 | 83% 75% 92% | 130 106 153 | 21% 17% 26% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.15 1.06 1.24 | 267 263 272 | 23 12 11 | / 19 11 8 / | 3 1 2 | +4 +1 +3 | 79% 75% 83% | 163 160 167 | 30% 29% 32% | 6 4 2 | 2 1 1 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.11 1.24 0.99 | 209 225 194 | 17 9 8 | / 16 8 8 / | 11 8 3 | +1 +1 0 | 71% 58% 83% | 142 154 131 | 23% 19% 30% | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.01 0.67 1.35 | 227 190 264 | 19 8 11 | / 17 10 7 / | 8 4 4 | +2 -2 +4 | 79% 75% 83% | 150 143 157 | 23% 19% 27% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.68 0.73 0.62 | 152 175 131 | 10 6 4 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 0 3 | -7 -3 -4 | 67% 58% 75% | 123 130 117 | 21% 19% 22% | 3 2 1 | 4 2 2 | -1 0 -1 |
Shush [#3]TSM 2 - 1 SEN
Edit: prediction before NV yay announcement
honestly even if this is a wrong prediction, TSM vs SEN is gonna be closer than people think
Crayzid [#4]honestly even if this is a wrong prediction, TSM vs SEN is gonna be closer than people think
Yea, both of these teams have a, for the lack of a better term, straightforward approach to the game.
I really liked the way we used to play a year ago but results are still there so I guess I can't really complain
Swiftmal [#1]SEN Envy 2-0 SEN
It's still so funny to me that I got downvoted 84 times for picking NV over TSM to win last game...
Shush [#3]TSM 2 - 1 SEN
Edit: prediction before NV yay announcement
damn, the only sen fan ive ever seen in my life accepting sentinels arent unbeatable. you have my respect brother you're not that type of toxic stan.
Ok, here's some actual analysis. I could see this match going two different ways:
NV 2-1 SEN
SEN 2-0 TSM
NV has always had a bad matchup against TSM and aggressive teams with high individual fragging in general (FaZe), so if they manage to overcome TSM with their new roster change, in my mind the scrimbux will most likely be real and they will beat SEN with the honeymoon momentum as well. SEN are so strong on so many different maps so I think they will at least take 1 map, however.
If TSM win, I think SEN has what it takes to shut down TSM, since TSM improved similarly to FaZe in Masters 1 (high individual fragging + improved teamwork, they both got 5th seed as well). I could be wrong, and TSM could absolutely win this game if their star players are popping. Regardless, if TSM beat NV I think they will make Berlin, whether they beat SEN or not.
bogdi_jesus666 [#18]damn, the only sen fan ive ever seen in my life accepting sentinels arent unbeatable. you have my respect brother you're not that type of toxic stan.
the lower bracket run start now, i still believe that we can make it to berlin
i just hope now that envy can beat sentinels, they look strong as hell
salut btw red
TSMAL1X [#36]YAY will jett diff TENZ, he's a god, lets see the anime battle that we wanted
tenz is not that good of a jett I think he's better on reyna and also wardell said easy to counter tenz is just op.
SENBobstar [#7]It's still so funny to me that I got downvoted 84 times for picking NV over TSM to win last game...
whomever downvotes you is such a scumbag
keep up little dog!
SENBobstar [#7]It's still so funny to me that I got downvoted 84 times for picking NV over TSM to win last game...
thats because no one likes you on this platform. if it were someone else, he wouldnt get 84 downvotes
edtheking12 [#43]thats because no one likes you on this platform. if it were someone else, he wouldnt get 84 downvotes
Ok
TSMAL1X [#36]YAY will jett diff TENZ, he's a god, lets see the anime battle that we wanted
12 rounds down and yay only got 1 kill on tenz while tenz killed him more than 5 times 1 vs 1. Not sure what diff u talking about
Andrew412 [#39]tenz is not that good of a jett I think he's better on reyna and also wardell said easy to counter tenz is just op.
TenZ not good on Jett? He is the best Jett NA. Did you say that just because his KDA wasnt great today? Did you forget iceland?
Andrew412 [#39]tenz is not that good of a jett I think he's better on reyna and also wardell said easy to counter tenz is just op.
Im not even a TenZ fan. I am only speaking from facts and past performances.
pewpew [#53]For people saying that I was wrong about NV Victor being overrated, try to prove me wrong again.
14-17 unreal performance
pewpew [#53]For people saying that I was wrong about NV Victor being overrated, try to prove me wrong again.
i mean he did have some crazy moments but yeah. Hes really good but people act like hes a top 10 player
pewpew [#53]For people saying that I was wrong about NV Victor being overrated, try to prove me wrong again.
Yeah, like don't get me wrong, he is a great player and everything but people put him in the top 5 duelists in NA and I am like "what?"
lxndrLEET [#59]yay so many questionable plays
i think he's too used to having to one man army for his team, 1 week with nv isn't enough to kill off habits
pewpew [#58]Yeah, like don't get me wrong, he is a great player and everything but people put him in the top 5 duelists in NA and I am like "what?"
he isn’t top 5 duelists NA. food is way better than him
Middi [#63]What a throw
5-1 5-7
NV is not throwing lol. SEN just had better coordination and aim, as simple as that. Throws are what TSM usually do.
pewpew [#65]NV is not throwing lol. SEN just had better coordination and aim, as simple as that. Throws are what TSM usually do.
This is actually a throw
It was 5-1 lead with the round against pistols
Somehow they gave up their own game
bogdi_jesus666 [#18]damn, the only sen fan ive ever seen in my life accepting sentinels arent unbeatable. you have my respect brother you're not that type of toxic stan.
salty tsm fans be like