Jamppi - 1.25R
f1cio - 1.16R
zekken - 1.15R
Jinggg - 1.14R
d4v41 - 1.11R
BuZz - 1.11R
TenZ - 1.10R
nAts - 1.08R
MaKo - 1.08R
something - 1.08R
Zerphyr1 [#5]only 2 from sen but 3 from prx. Just shows that sen have no real under performers and prx are very inconsistent
jingg's ratings are inflated, same with mindfreak and monyet since they did not play as many rounds due to them being swapped, something and d4v4i were never removed and forsaken only once so theirs is more legit
WhoseTao [#7]jingg's ratings are inflated, same with mindfreak and monyet since they did not play as many rounds due to them being swapped, something and d4v4i were never removed and forsaken only once so theirs is more legit
you could use the same argument for the other way round though
Zerphyr1 [#8]you could use the same argument for the other way round though
? in what way? Jinggg has high rating because he was good but also because his sample size is smaller, unlike something who was also good but with a larger sample size
WhoseTao [#9]? in what way? Jinggg has high rating because he was good but also because his sample size is smaller, unlike something who was also good but with a larger sample size
monyet had a bad rating but since it's a small sample size he could have played very well in those games and if he kept playing maybe his actual rating would be even lower.
Zerphyr1 [#10]monyet had a bad rating but since it's a small sample size he could have played very well in those games and if he kept playing maybe his actual rating would be even lower.
Yea because monyet did not have a great tournament unfortunately, his rating is low because of already meh performance with a lower # games, so in reality if you were to extrapolate his ratings would have been lower