RA 2-1 ASE
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
273 | 20 | / 15 / | 7 | +5 | ||||||||
|
260 | 20 | / 12 / | 7 | +8 | ||||||||
|
237 | 19 | / 11 / | 6 | +8 | ||||||||
|
143 | 10 | / 11 / | 14 | -1 | ||||||||
|
140 | 9 | / 11 / | 6 | -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
200 | 12 | / 15 / | 4 | -3 | ||||||||
|
187 | 14 | / 15 / | 2 | -1 | ||||||||
|
164 | 12 | / 15 / | 3 | -3 | ||||||||
|
161 | 12 | / 17 / | 1 | -5 | ||||||||
|
158 | 10 | / 16 / | 7 | -6 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
244 | 51 | / 44 / | 13 | +7 | ||||||||
|
220 | 48 | / 43 / | 15 | +5 | ||||||||
|
193 | 39 | / 42 / | 14 | -3 | ||||||||
|
172 | 35 | / 37 / | 28 | -2 | ||||||||
|
141 | 27 | / 38 / | 28 | -11 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
212 | 47 | / 37 / | 13 | +10 | ||||||||
|
202 | 40 | / 47 / | 10 | -7 | ||||||||
|
200 | 42 | / 33 / | 15 | +9 | ||||||||
|
196 | 42 | / 42 / | 8 | 0 | ||||||||
|
166 | 33 | / 41 / | 24 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
236 | 15 | / 16 / | 4 | -1 | ||||||||
|
223 | 17 | / 15 / | 2 | +2 | ||||||||
|
192 | 12 | / 14 / | 10 | -2 | ||||||||
|
192 | 12 | / 15 / | 5 | -3 | ||||||||
|
162 | 9 | / 13 / | 9 | -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
258 | 17 | / 13 / | 4 | +4 | ||||||||
|
225 | 16 | / 12 / | 6 | +4 | ||||||||
|
214 | 16 | / 12 / | 5 | +4 | ||||||||
|
209 | 15 | / 14 / | 2 | +1 | ||||||||
|
138 | 9 | / 14 / | 9 | -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
237 | 14 | / 14 / | 4 | 0 | ||||||||
|
208 | 16 | / 16 / | 3 | 0 | ||||||||
|
202 | 15 | / 15 / | 4 | 0 | ||||||||
|
117 | 8 | / 14 / | 5 | -6 | ||||||||
|
87 | 4 | / 12 / | 12 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
247 | 19 | / 10 / | 4 | +9 | ||||||||
|
202 | 14 | / 11 / | 8 | +3 | ||||||||
|
192 | 13 | / 13 / | 4 | 0 | ||||||||
|
188 | 11 | / 17 / | 5 | -6 | ||||||||
|
186 | 14 | / 6 / | 6 | +8 |
What an absolute banger. The biggest question in my mind is "will they play Ascent?" FPX absolutely dominated ASE on Ascent, beating them 13-1, and I'm sure many of us are aware of just how strong Trace Esports can be on that map. It's definitely going to be a close match regardless of the maps played. I believe that it will go all three maps, but I can't pinpoint a winner this time. Going off my gut and intuition, I think TE will come out on top of a 2-1 hard fought win. I just feel like TE's individual players are just better than the FPX players; but that's just my opinion.
2-1 TE win.
geospliced [#5]What an absolute banger. The biggest question in my mind is "will they play Ascent?" FPX absolutely dominated ASE on Ascent, beating them 13-1, and I'm sure many of us are aware of just how strong Trace Esports can be on that map. It's definitely going to be a close match regardless of the maps played. I believe that it will go all three maps, but I can't pinpoint a winner this time. Going off my gut and intuition, I think TE will come out on top of a 2-1 hard fought win. I just feel like TE's individual players are just better than the FPX players; but that's just my opinion.
2-1 TE win.
TE beats FPX on Ascent with 13-5 though
Arrucka [#6]TE beats FPX on Ascent with 13-5 though
Yeah but FPX's clearly stepped up their Ascent game since their last meeting with TE.