G2 Esports

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ❌
LoL Team: ✅
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ❌

OpTic Gaming

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ❌
LoL Team: ❌
Financially Stable: ❌
GC Team in VALORANT: ❌
Based in NA: ✅

FlyQuest

History in VALORANT: ❌
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ✅
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ✅

FaZe Clan

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ❌
Financially Stable: ❌
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ✅

TSM

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ❌
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ❌
Based in NA: ✅

Ghost Gaming

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ❌
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ❌
Based in NA: ✅

XSET

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ❌
LoL Team: ❌
Financially Stable: ❌
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ✅

Disguised

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ✅
Financially Stable: ❌
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ✅

Version1

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ❌
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ✅

Complexity Gaming

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ❌
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ✅

Dignitas

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ✅
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ❌
Based in NA: ✅

Golden Guardians

History in VALORANT: ❌
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ✅
Financially Stable: ❌
GC Team in VALORANT: ❌
Based in NA: ✅

MAD Lions

History in VALORANT: ✅
Good relationship with Riot: ✅
LoL Team: ✅
Financially Stable: ✅
GC Team in VALORANT: ✅
Based in NA: ❌

any other possible organizations?

dw ill pick them up

Xset or dsg

I would love to know where ur knowledge of their financial stability comes from. Like genuinely, not ironically.

YFred [#4]

I would love to know where ur knowledge of their financial stability comes from. Like genuinely, not ironically.

just from what i have heard, generally when orgs are having financial problems it goes public (e.g. SEN)

mysterii [#5]

just from what i have heard, generally when orgs are having financial problems it goes public (e.g. SEN)

sen does not have financial problems.

if they do, other orgs have it worse. stop parroting the misinformation of the sen financial report.

moonemi [#6]

sen does not have financial problems.

if they do, other orgs have it worse. stop parroting the misinformation of the sen financial report.

moonemi [#6]

sen does not have financial problems.

if they do, other orgs have it worse. stop parroting the misinformation of the sen financial report.

Yes, that is exactly why i asked, because there is so much misunderstanding of financials out there. People who think Sentinels in any closer to going under than probably 80% of the other orgs, just doesn´t understand financial statments and what these investor disclosures actually mean.

TSM basically had to sell their LCS slot because they lost their main sponsor, so i don´t know why OP thinks they are financially stable.
Same for most of the other orgs.
Or for example DSG: Toast said he would be willing to spend money on esports for the next year without any return. that does not mean, that he doesn´t have another 2-3 mil in the bank that he might be willing to spend or isn´t "financially stable".

90% of these are pure speculation.

dignitas look interested

YFred [#8]

Yes, that is exactly why i asked, because there is so much misunderstanding of financials out there. People who think Sentinels in any closer to going under than probably 80% of the other orgs, just doesn´t understand financial statments and what these investor disclosures actually mean.

TSM basically had to sell their LCS slot because they lost their main sponsor, so i don´t know why OP thinks they are financially stable.
Same for most of the other orgs.
Or for example DSG: Toast said he would be willing to spend money on esports for the next year without any return. that does not mean, that he doesn´t have another 2-3 mil in the bank that he might be willing to spend or isn´t "financially stable".

90% of these are pure speculation.

I mean all the current top orgs would be losing money but the reason they are still investing in esports is for the future as in 10 or more years it will most likely become profitable so they wan't to get in on that faster then other competitors when the time comes.

Zerphyr1 [#9]

dignitas look interested

added

g2 have a good relationship with riot lol.

loudsimp [#12]

g2 have a good relationship with riot lol.

not after "the incident"....

mysterii [#11]

added

dignitas had a gc team btw

Zerphyr1 [#14]

dignitas had a gc team btw

ik they did but im js going off of current for GC teams

mysterii [#15]

ik they did but im js going off of current for GC teams

alr

Zerphyr1 [#13]

not after "the incident"....

Still after "the incident": they have dropped carlos, still have a gc team, still have a val team and make val content. Plus they have heavily invested in lol

loudsimp [#17]

Still after "the incident": they have dropped carlos, still have a gc team, still have a val team and make val content. Plus they have heavily invested in lol

everything u mentioned doesn't change anything to do with how good of a relationship riot has with g2. Dropping carlos definitely helped but you can't just assume that solely because of that g2 are now back to being in a good relationship with riot.

moonemi [#6]

sen does not have financial problems.

if they do, other orgs have it worse. stop parroting the misinformation of the sen financial report.

Sideshow has a pretty good (quite long) video on YouTube where he goes into a lot of depth explaining what the report actually means.

Like, if anyone is genuinely interested in this topic, here's the video:
https://youtu.be/iw_rPWRhBnc?si=jgA6tZF6i8DtURNa

where is this financially stable info coming from

funny_prank [#20]

where is this financially stable info coming from

#5 i could 100% be wrong about a couple of orgs