Yessirskiiii [#35]
I mean, i think Messi is the best football player of all time but Ronaldo is definitely comparable . Also the argument is: Modric peak is definitely the 2nd best out of all the midfielders with Zizou being first. Modric has been an amazing midfielder for almost 20 years, longevity has not been matched by any midfielder. Also Xavi, Iniesta, Kroos, Xabi, Özil, KDB and many more great midfielders were at their prime or close to it when Modric was the best midfielder itw. It's not Modric's fault that Xavi or Iniesta didn't have his longevity and faded out at 32-33. Modric's world cup. 2018 is again, probably the 2nd best out of all the midfielders. Zizou beating him out once again. Ballon d'or is there to help his case further. 5 CLs where he was Real's most important midfielder and best midfielder itw too
Modric hasnt been the best midfielder for 20 years, he only started being in the conversation of best midfielders itw at the age of 27-28, he has had 10 good years but so have others, they just had it earlier than him.
Balon dor really doesnt mean much cus the only reason Xavi and Iniesta didnt win it is cus Messi and Ronaldo were in their prime, like dont tell me you think Benzema is better than Suarez, Lewa, Henry, Aguero, Zlatan just cus of balon dor cus he doesnt even come close to them.
and tbh messi or ronaldo should have won the 2018 balon dor too, also I hate how Modric gets all the credit for Coratia's WC run when Rakatic, Perisic and Mandzukic were just as impressive, Modric was still their best player but it wasnt a carryjob like everyone states it to be.
He is a one of the greatest midfielders oat but if we are not including maradona or dinho I would still put Xavi, Iniesta, Zizou above him comfortably also didnt really watch Mathaus so cant really comment on him.