Who do you think has had the best run statistically in a single tournament? Yay? TenZ? zmjKK? Let me know. I’m going to be watching all the games from each suggestion to come to my own conclusion, but I need your help remembering the best of the best.
1
Best Solo Statistical Tournament Run
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
donut2612 [#4]GEN k1Ng 1.36 rating at lock/in is the highest average rating at a major
best by a winner is SEN TenZ at reykjavik 2021
YES thank you. Exactly what i was looking for
vreesey [#5]YES thank you. Exactly what i was looking for
he only played one match which was vs loud and they lost 9-13 12-14
Asuna_Yuuki [#9]Bro its one match bro
Means nothing
I’m not trying to derive meaning from it. I’m just studying why each player found success, no matter if it’s short term or across multiple series’.
trembolonaRage [#8]prolly mwzera in 2021
idk how they let the wifi be turned on in the mental ward but we get another delusional take from trembo
theogblazen [#15]are you talking internationally?
Cause if not Something has so many crazy runs in JP and his regular Season run was NUTS.
vlr users when something farms t2 🗿
Hard2Decipher [#3]Zmjjkk?? Dont make me laugh they didnt even go so deep in the tournament for his name to be in the list
Maybe pick someone whose team reached top 4
To answer your question its yay
he wasnt even the best player in that tournament..
like the kid's insane but why you gotta ovverrate him this much its actually sickening
vreesey [#10]I’m not trying to derive meaning from it. I’m just studying why each player found success, no matter if it’s short term or across multiple series’.
k1ng did not find succes. He had a good game lol
theogblazen [#18]“Season Run” or maybe u are illiterate
dipshit he asked for the best S+ event stat run not for something who didn’t play at Tokyo and wasn’t even prxs best player in playoffs
The_Cleg [#19]he wasnt even the best player in that tournament..
like the kid's insane but why you gotta ovverrate him this much its actually sickening
insane is a bit of a stretch for one tournament
He had some good moments in one tournament, lets not put him so high, shall we?
donut2612 [#4]GEN k1Ng 1.36 rating at lock/in is the highest average rating at a major
best by a winner is SEN TenZ at reykjavik 2021
Not even 50 rounds, can't count that
Hard2Decipher [#23]insane is a bit of a stretch for one tournament
He had some good moments in one tournament, lets not put him so high, shall we?
That's literally my point??? But saying he wasn't insane like tfym bro 😭 like do you even watch the games
tls127 [#17]Mako at lock in for me. 240 acs is nuts to average on controller
nAts had 284 avg on Viper in Berlin, 265 avg overall
theogblazen [#15]are you talking internationally?
Cause if not Something has so many crazy runs in JP and his regular Season run was NUTS.
I prefer International, but any recommendations are welcome. I just like watching outstanding performances and seeing what caused them to find that level of performance.
The_Cleg [#20]k1ng did not find succes. He had a good game lol
he found success during that game tho? there's something to learn from any success, no matter how shortlived
vreesey [#29]he found success during that game tho? there's something to learn from any success, no matter how shortlived
Bro wtfdym then like 99% of players found success in 1 game? Just watch all the games atp fym 😭😭😭
The_Cleg [#30]Bro wtfdym then like 99% of players found success in 1 game? Just watch all the games atp fym 😭😭😭
it's a statistical anomaly. It sticks out from the rest of the performances enough for someone to mention it so obviously he was doing something right. Please don't be ignorant.
vreesey [#5]YES thank you. Exactly what i was looking for
In a very least, you could make separate groups of rounds played, say, up 50 rounds, up to 100 rounds, and so on... and then fill in players with the highest rating... if you're comparing... and I too agree that in a tournament that went up to 380 rounds, K1ng's 48 rounds is not reliable, though it still paints some picture but very sketchy.
vreesey [#29]he found success during that game tho? there's something to learn from any success, no matter how shortlived
It's unreliable to assess a professional based on one game... Extremely untrustworthy! You will not see that, regardless of the sport discipline or anything other than a terrific game of that professional.
Edit: Yes, you can locate an outlier and study it as well as any other outlier occurrences, but not from this single game of 48 rounds because it is not a reliable sample. Yes, there are ways for doing so in practise; but, significant data is required to even begin researching. An acceptable data set is one that adheres to similar conditions, thus consider 10 (the more, the better) GENG vs. LOUD games on same maps with the same players on both teams. That would be somewhat close to the terms! But there's no data on that, isn't there? Therefore we could just conclude that it was just a good game for the player (k1ng). And we're not talking about same strats of k1ng's opponent that also need to adhere as conditions! You can see where this is headed.
And of course, don't forget that a game is, at its heart, a succession of probable events that could be influenced in the favour of one team = a win and vice versa. At times, the game may be as chaotic or as grindy as you like depending on how well the opponent prepared. And here is when luck comes into play. If a team is unstudied or unknown, the opponent will often struggle to interpret their moves until they finally lock them up and begin counterplaying - this monitoring is continual during the game (I'm sure you already knew that). So, during pockets of unknown/unread times, players can improvise and, as a result of their skill in place, obtain some good number of surprise kills = LUCK. This is not a comprehensive explanation and pretty naive imho, but it's an attempt to touch a topic that is quite massive.
Avoid dragging numbers by their ears in your favour, bruh ... not going to get you anywhere.
donut2612 [#4]GEN k1Ng 1.36 rating at lock/in is the highest average rating at a major
best by a winner is SEN TenZ at reykjavik 2021
lock in wasn’t a major. it was a kick off/preseason event
vreesey [#31]it's a statistical anomaly. It sticks out from the rest of the performances enough for someone to mention it so obviously he was doing something right. Please don't be ignorant.
This is such bs I give up dawg
cboomer [#22]dipshit he asked for the best S+ event stat run not for something who didn’t play at Tokyo and wasn’t even prxs best player in playoffs
yes he was did u watch playoffs he won MVP and playoffs account for it as well. He droppped almost a 100+ on DRX? And as you clearly can see he wasn’t necessarily talking international and never stated it SIT DOG
theogblazen [#37]yes he was did u watch playoffs he won MVP and playoffs account for it as well. He droppped almost a 100+ on DRX? And as you clearly can see he wasn’t necessarily talking international and never stated it SIT DOG
ur just riding the teams third best player jinggg dropped 92 while playing better individually in that same series
dont care about some random esports award MVP in the farmers league incase you havent realized DIPSHIT something hasn't played a tournament yet playoffs is the league and im pretty sure he wasnt asking about somethings t2 Japanese invitational tournaments
just stop bro hes the third best player on that team people act like prx didnt just finish who tf gets replaced for a content creator their team finishes third and they still get praise lmfao
clocksky888 [#34]It's unreliable to assess a professional based on one game... Extremely untrustworthy! You will not see that, regardless of the sport discipline or anything other than a terrific game of that professional.
Edit: Yes, you can locate an outlier and study it as well as any other outlier occurrences, but not from this single game of 48 rounds because it is not a reliable sample. Yes, there are ways for doing so in practise; but, significant data is required to even begin researching. An acceptable data set is one that adheres to similar conditions, thus consider 10 (the more, the better) GENG vs. LOUD games on same maps with the same players on both teams. That would be somewhat close to the terms! But there's no data on that, isn't there? Therefore we could just conclude that it was just a good game for the player (k1ng). And we're not talking about same strats of k1ng's opponent that also need to adhere as conditions! You can see where this is headed.
And of course, don't forget that a game is, at its heart, a succession of probable events that could be influenced in the favour of one team = a win and vice versa. At times, the game may be as chaotic or as grindy as you like depending on how well the opponent prepared. And here is when luck comes into play. If a team is unstudied or unknown, the opponent will often struggle to interpret their moves until they finally lock them up and begin counterplaying - this monitoring is continual during the game (I'm sure you already knew that). So, during pockets of unknown/unread times, players can improvise and, as a result of their skill in place, obtain some good number of surprise kills = LUCK. This is not a comprehensive explanation and pretty naive imho, but it's an attempt to touch a topic that is quite massive.
Avoid dragging numbers by their ears in your favour, bruh ... not going to get you anywhere.
I understand that. I'm not trying to determine the best player, I'm not trying to derive anything other than "why he found success". I understand the factors, I'm not 12 years old. You don't have to explain statistics for me. Get off my dick, respectfully.
The_Cleg [#36]This is such bs I give up dawg
why are you mad that i'm trying to find the best performances? lmfao Go outside bro. I literally want to watch the match to understand why things played out the way that they did. Why are u so pressed lmfao
cboomer [#39]ur just riding the teams third best player jinggg dropped 92 while playing better individually in that same series
dont care about some random esports award MVP in the farmers league incase you havent realized DIPSHIT something hasn't played a tournament yet playoffs is the league and im pretty sure he wasnt asking about somethings t2 Japanese invitational tournaments
just stop bro hes the third best player on that team people act like prx didnt just finish who tf gets replaced for a content creator their team finishes third and they still get praise lmfao
THIRD BEST PLAYER LMAOOOOO DELUSIONAL ASF
Bro had the best statistcal season out of everyone except Alfa. He was consistently preforming all season and was definelty the best player on the team during the season, just cause they got third without him doesnt mean they wouldnt of done better with him ur spitting non sense. Keep coping the only farmers league is SHITMEA, like i said I pointed out either one cause watching him drop 130+ kills in a series is pretty exciting. Stop being a hater for no reason his regular season run was the best this season. Keep barking for me I love sitting you down
theogblazen [#42]THIRD BEST PLAYER LMAOOOOO DELUSIONAL ASF
Bro had the best statistcal season out of everyone except Alfa. He was consistently preforming all season and was definelty the best player on the team during the season, just cause they got third without him doesnt mean they wouldnt of done better with him ur spitting non sense. Keep coping the only farmers league is SHITMEA, like i said I pointed out either one cause watching him drop 130+ kills in a series is pretty exciting. Stop being a hater for no reason his regular season run was the best this season. Keep barking for me I love sitting you down
ur just delusional what other team could sub in a cc and do that besides fnc lol
disrespect to jinggg the goat will never cease to amaze me
clocksky888 [#34]It's unreliable to assess a professional based on one game... Extremely untrustworthy! You will not see that, regardless of the sport discipline or anything other than a terrific game of that professional.
Edit: Yes, you can locate an outlier and study it as well as any other outlier occurrences, but not from this single game of 48 rounds because it is not a reliable sample. Yes, there are ways for doing so in practise; but, significant data is required to even begin researching. An acceptable data set is one that adheres to similar conditions, thus consider 10 (the more, the better) GENG vs. LOUD games on same maps with the same players on both teams. That would be somewhat close to the terms! But there's no data on that, isn't there? Therefore we could just conclude that it was just a good game for the player (k1ng). And we're not talking about same strats of k1ng's opponent that also need to adhere as conditions! You can see where this is headed.
And of course, don't forget that a game is, at its heart, a succession of probable events that could be influenced in the favour of one team = a win and vice versa. At times, the game may be as chaotic or as grindy as you like depending on how well the opponent prepared. And here is when luck comes into play. If a team is unstudied or unknown, the opponent will often struggle to interpret their moves until they finally lock them up and begin counterplaying - this monitoring is continual during the game (I'm sure you already knew that). So, during pockets of unknown/unread times, players can improvise and, as a result of their skill in place, obtain some good number of surprise kills = LUCK. This is not a comprehensive explanation and pretty naive imho, but it's an attempt to touch a topic that is quite massive.
Avoid dragging numbers by their ears in your favour, bruh ... not going to get you anywhere.
allat
The_Cleg [#19]he wasnt even the best player in that tournament..
like the kid's insane but why you gotta ovverrate him this much its actually sickening
Kang Kang had the highest ACS of the event. Don't u ever talk down on the goat like that again.
donut2612 [#44]allat
"I understand that. I'm not trying to determine the best player, I'm not trying to derive anything other than "why he found success". I understand the factors, I'm not 12 years old. You don't have to explain statistics for me. Get off my dick, respectfully."
Edit --> Probably coming off as a massive dick with the above ... but guilty as charged - kind of low ;)
vreesey [#40]I understand that. I'm not trying to determine the best player, I'm not trying to derive anything other than "why he found success". I understand the factors, I'm not 12 years old. You don't have to explain statistics for me. Get off my dick, respectfully.
No way you're angry, just like that. Wasn't lecturing you there at all, just going through some points to think about. That's all there is to it. As I previously stated, the topic may get rather intricate, so a little rigour won't hurt - never. Also, someone else may come across it in the future and it may help them with their questions - who knows?
The bit, "Avoid dragging numbers by their ears in your favour, bruh ... not going to get you anywhere" was not meant to slap you off your high horse or anyone in that matter, but raising a major issue - no matter how well educated one is, they will always struggle with the rigour of their research... no matter how deep they delve. GD
clocksky888 [#47]No way you're angry, just like that. Wasn't lecturing you there at all, just going through some points to think about. That's all there is to it. As I previously stated, the topic may get rather intricate, so a little rigour won't hurt - never. Also, someone else may come across it in the future and it may help them with their questions - who knows?
The bit, "Avoid dragging numbers by their ears in your favour, bruh ... not going to get you anywhere" was not meant to slap you off your high horse or anyone in that matter, but raising a major issue - no matter how well educated one is, they will always struggle with the rigour of their research... no matter how deep they delve. GD
I reread your message and I want to apologize. I let other responses change how I responded to your logical and fair comments. I'm sorry I was an ass. I hope you have a good day.
vreesey [#41]why are you mad that i'm trying to find the best performances? lmfao Go outside bro. I literally want to watch the match to understand why things played out the way that they did. Why are u so pressed lmfao
I'm not pressed. You are just spitting dogs.
There have been hundreds of single-game performances better thank k1ng's one.
Discord