World ranking won't be consistent enough to formulate a ranking among teams. Maybe we'll rank the regions, but to have a consistent elo system between regions would require SO much more international play, which Riot might not do(see league)
Especially with how volatile the scene now(Version1, KRU, Sharks might not qualify) it doesn't make sense for there to be a ranking with 20 teams that don't play at every international event that only happens once every quarter.
One world ranking idea thought of is to rank the teams in Iceland, and then fill in the gaps with how good the rest of the teams are proporrtional to the iceland teams.
Like Maybe give SEN 2000, Fnatic 1950, V1 1900, and then see how Cloud9, Guild, FPX, Envy, 100T rank relative point wise to the iceland teams in the rankings tab
idk if im being clear or not
mattgg2015 [#2]One world ranking idea thought of is to rank the teams in Iceland, and then fill in the gaps with how good the rest of the teams are proporrtional to the iceland teams.
Like Maybe give SEN 2000, Fnatic 1950, V1 1900, and then see how Cloud9, Guild, FPX, Envy, 100T rank relative point wise to the iceland teams in the rankings tab
idk if im being clear or not
No, that doesn't make sense. You can't objectively say "FPX would've beat/lost to Sentinels or 100T would've crushed Fnatic" because you haven't watched them play each other.
Youngztar [#3]I think after Berlin a world ranking could be done
Depends on the teams that qualify tbh. Overall I wouldn't be much of a fan of it being released until after Champions. That will be just the 3rd (I believe) LAN of the game and even that is little to base a world ranking off of. Quite frankly I don't see the need to rush this, what is the point of a world ranking that is nothing more than a semi-educated guess.
Discord