As I said before 'Football wasn’t developed enough to possess technologies capable of providing any competitive advantage'. This is not an opinion. The football technologies used by the wealthiest European clubs (currently) did not exist in the past. In purely structural matters, everything was level. You confuse verb tenses or manipulate them in a way that is convenient for you to think you are refuting something beyond ghosts in your mind. With globalization and football development, ways of gaining advantages on the field began to emerge (here the roles of clubs in athlete formation come in) beyond purely individual and collective skills. "Who gets the credit for developing and maintaining that competitiveness in the scene? Is it not the EU clubs?" Just to clarify, according to IFFHS, the strongest league in the world is the Brazilian one: (https://www.iffhs.com/posts/2483). Answering your question: competitiveness is maintained because the best players are there, and the best (the vast majority) are imported from other regions. The fairest credit we can give to European clubs is that they have enough money to buy players from anywhere in the world to keep their league always at a high level. The MLS, for example, has structure but lacks competitiveness. No player aspires to play in the American league because it is very weak. And it is weak because it does not have the best players. The club's structure is just a drop in the ocean. As for Brazilian clubs: as you yourself say, it is a two-way street - we contribute to the evolution and maintenance of European football by exporting our best players while Brazilian clubs benefit by earning billions per year with player transfers. The biggest Brazilian clubs are not behind the European average when it comes to training centers, food, structure, etc. I don't know where you got this completely wrong idea. It is a fact that European giants, like Real Madrid, have a unique quality, but they have a high standard even for most other clubs in their league. To finish this part - Flamengo, for example, one of the richest teams in Brazil, in 2022 was the 18th club with the highest payroll in the world. (https://www.uol.com.br/esporte/futebol/colunas/rafael-reis/2022/08/26/fla-tem-a-18-maior-folha-salarial-do-mundo-4-brasileiros-estao-no-top-50.htm) Not to mention that there are clubs managed as if they were companies (SAF), where they manage to have a large net annual income enough to provide an excellent quality structure. (https://www.scielo.br/j/rac/a/qCtMycKvdT7rSq5cgF3sPHM/)
"can i say that no Brazilian club inspite of having 5x population and craze behind football can create and sustain a club that can stand up to big EU clubs?"
With this question, you show again your total lack of knowledge about the subject. The only way we can know if the best Brazilian club currently is better than the best European club currently is through the Club World Cup that takes place every year. Well, Brazil has already won this championship TEN times, against giants like Real Madrid, Barcelona, Liverpool, Milan, Manchester, among others. We are only behind Spain, which has won 12 times. And this is largely due to Real Madrid and their crop of good players. (https://ge.globo.com/futebol/mundial-de-clubes/noticia/2023/02/11/mundial-de-clubes-lista-completa-de-campeoes-e-finais.ghtml)
Football players are competitive athletes by nature and often prioritize the pursuit of victory and personal success over other considerations, including higher salaries. For these players, competition is the essence of sport, and the pursuit of victory is a powerful motivation. Many players choose to play for teams that offer the opportunity to compete at a high level, even if it means earning less money than they could elsewhere. As I mentioned before, athletes PRIORITIZE competitiveness and depending on the circumstances, they may opt for money. Cristiano Ronaldo is 38 years old, nearing retirement and no longer has the same stamina as he did when he was younger. His choices are limited, so deciding to play for a less competitive club that offers more money is a circumstance that would not have been taken into consideration when he was 25 years old and one of the best in the world. At that time, even if he received a billionaire offer to play in the Middle East with a higher salary than he was receiving, he would certainly prioritize Real Madrid to continue playing in Europe because he was at his peak and knew that the competitiveness of playing in a high-level league spoke louder than the best salaries. In summary: CR7 "choosing money" is a circumstance of events that happened and led him to make that decision. This exception was included in the argumentation of the previous post. After all, I am not crazy enough to deny that many opt for money. Messi wanting to return to Barcelona and earn less than he does at PSG is further irrefutable proof that money has no weight on the athlete's decision. The PSG project failed. They hired several top players and still failed to achieve their goal of becoming champions of the Champions League.
Again here, you use personal experiences and particular impressions to express an opinion as if it were an absolute truth or deserving of some credit. Politics are based on narratives, not truths/lies. Whoever is in power holds the current narrative. I thought you knew that. When you talk about nationalism, you demonstrate again that you don't understand anything about what you're talking about. Just to clarify: Nationalism is a political ideology that defends national identity as something primordial and prioritizes the interests of the nation over individual interests or those of other nations. There are people who do not identify with this ideology and who may have different political views. It has nothing to do with patriotism, which is basically love and loyalty to the homeland, respect for the country, etc. Patriotism does not necessarily involve a belief and is the closest thing you can correlate with Brazilian e-sports fans. Nothing to do with Brazilian politics and the nationalism 'sold' by other countries. When you state that "Brazilian teams don't buy European players," you show again how ignorant you are and speak whatever comes to mind, without any foundation. FURIA has a team with American players, European players in various games. A Brazilian organization. If you want to follow them closely, just go to FURIA's English Twitter: (https://twitter.com/FURIA_USA) One of the best Valorant coaches was bought by Loud, and he is... American. I hope I have answered everything and clarified the topics.