higher gc viewership

ok forgive me cause i kinda just woke up to the entire debate but does gc really need higher viewership? a lot of people on twitter saying "omgggg this is so good for the scene cause these players will finally get the viewership they deserve" like bro what? They are dogshit. Majority in the scene is ASS.The entire point of the scene is to make them not ass. Why are we overplaying the effects toast's team will have on the scene lol

Terrible bait / dogshit take. Try not to be a dickhead challenge (difficulty: impossible)

higher gc viewership = more people interested in gc = more people playing in gc = better players entering the scene

Ryan9500 [#3]

higher gc viewership = more people interested in gc = more people playing in gc = better players entering the scene

all the good players will get picked up regardless lol i assure there are no good players that are "under the radar"

Sugo [#2]

Terrible bait / dogshit take. Try not to be a dickhead challenge (difficulty: impossible)

eh maybe i am being a dickhead. i just don't see a point to it ig. the overall impact will be good, but not as exponential as people are playing it up to be

ash_knuckles [#4]

all the good players will get picked up regardless lol i assure there are no good players that are "under the radar"

you never know, the next florescent could be watching toast's team

ash_knuckles [#4]

all the good players will get picked up regardless lol i assure there are no good players that are "under the radar"

Gamechangers isnt really about the here and now.
Its more about creating a path, a gateway and support for marginalized genders to compete in esports.

Its reducing the stigma about women in gaming and to help make gaming a more positive space for maginalized genders.

Ryan9500 [#6]

you never know, the next florescent could be watching toast's team

alright alright i'll take the optimism pill goddammit

capital_d_colon [#7]

Gamechangers isnt really about the here and now.
Its more about creating a path, a gateway and support for marginalized genders to compete in esports.

Its reducing the stigma about women in gaming and to help make gaming a more positive space for maginalized genders.

sound like Riot’s head of PR trying to raise the company’s esg score

capital_d_colon [#7]

Gamechangers isnt really about the here and now.
Its more about creating a path, a gateway and support for marginalized genders to compete in esports.

Its reducing the stigma about women in gaming and to help make gaming a more positive space for maginalized genders.

imma be super real rn the only way i see major walls of stigmatization being broken is if the top 1% of gc start making actual good t2 runs. all good tho OPTIMISM YEAA!!

brobeans [#9]

sound like Riot’s head of PR trying to raise the company’s esg score

we do their dirty work for them

higher viewership is good for anything but people are beyond delusional thinking its gonna help gc get more and better players and some day be a top team in a mixed tournament. but dont even debate this people are stupid

brobeans [#9]

sound like Riot’s head of PR trying to raise the company’s esg score

I highly doubt creating a gc circuit would raise riot's own esg score.

Esg is about benefiting marginalized employees.
the rankings show the “Best Place to Work for LGBTQ+ Equality.”

as far as im aware gc players are not employed by riot games themselves.