They are good, but i thought they are on the same tier like Loud, fnatic, and NRG, DRX, or NAVI
But i was wrong. They are not the best NA clearly, even Sentinels might be better than them
Selex [#2]Fnatic? lol, we haven't learned from liquid i see.
what does liquid have to do with fnatic?
TheNotoriousNargas [#5]Why are we placing Fnatic on the same tier as the other 4 teams? As long as they have Boaster as an IGL they will never go anywhere near S tier, let alone a title.
gonna be honest Sen have depph
Docta [#6]Why can’t people see that EDG was playing well?
They don't care, they just wanna hate. Can't complain too much tho. NA fans would do the same if positions were reversed with a top EU team.
elegant [#8]what does liquid have to do with fnatic?
people said liquid was the emea superteam b4 losin 2-0 secret clearly superteams doesnt always work out but lets see
elegant [#8]what does liquid have to do with fnatic?
Overestimating teams we haven't seen play in months. Like we all did with liquid.
Subreezy [#11]no fucking clue bro they're a scary team
bro i don't like how these posts discredit both teams. That was clearly an insane series and it went down to the wire.
Prontera [#7]Boy sneakin fnatic in there for some reason. Even with liquid already set an example yesterday. Kekw
Also trust me. All those teams will have a little bit hard time too against EDG. EDG is a good team, stop underestimate them.
Fnatic is always make a deep run on the tournament (Copenhagen is an exception)
They are rarely choken on early match, but keep losing on OT in semis-playoff.
They kept 3 core players, meanwhile liquid is building the team from the scratch
Valgod [#12]Fnatic kept the core
Fnatic kept 3, liquid kept 2, but two of their new players came from the same team. Not much of a difference imo.
Selex [#14]Overestimating teams we haven't seen play in months. Like we all did with liquid.
like every other team in the tournament?
Selex [#20]Fnatic kept 3, liquid kept 2, but two of their new players came from the same team. Not much of a difference imo.
they change their igl. It's very different. From Russian to English comms, fnatic and tl condition are very different
ItsMeDio [#18]Fnatic is always make a deep run on the tournament (Copenhagen is an exception)
They are rarely choken on early match, but keep losing on OT in semis-playoff.
They kept 3 core players, meanwhile liquid is building the team from the scratch
The same core player that failed to win anything. I mean u mention sentinels up there as a top tier team without seeing anything from them. Just from their roster. So i dont know what to say about that.
All i know is EDG played better. All of those top teams u mentioned can find the same situation like 100t did. Even LOUD kinda struggle on 2nd map against GEN G.
Docta [#6]Why can’t people see that EDG was playing well?
On God bro. Both teams were playing their asses off. I’d venture to say that any of OP’s proclaimed “super teams” would have had a hard time with Edward.
crashhacker1 [#16]The mistake you're making is, 100T is indeed on the level of LOUD but EDG also played to that level today. With some more discipline, they win that series but they are on that level.
Based
ItsMeDio [#22]they change their igl. It's very different. From Russian to English comms, fnatic and tl condition are very different
That's a good point. But I'd still rather not rate a team that we haven't seen in months that highly.
Selex [#20]Fnatic kept 3, liquid kept 2, but two of their new players came from the same team. Not much of a difference imo.
There's a difference between adding a new igl and keeping the same igl for 3 years