opinions on the format of the lock-in?

tittle

good format it's fast

Dog shit

Good format for the purpose of the tournament

Its fun and leads to higher stakes, i still see why people don't like it but i enjoy it personally.

it's fine since it's some showmatch anyway

fun format but rip geng

I like it, but I love March Madness, so I was always fond for big single elimination tournaments.

good

brutal yet good in terms of trying to just showcase the teams, but at least we don't have to see teams like DFM playing again.

4 X 8 groups
16 qualifys AND THEN we do single elimination

sad for pasific team, Sao Paulo to Berlin & LA around 16 hours flight but Sao Paulo to Korea more than 24 hours flight

awful like the seeding

good since we can meme the ones who lose, but we cannot judge teams because one bad match.

horse69 [#11]

4 X 8 groups
16 qualifys AND THEN we do single elimination

Garbage

why is everyone talking about the format like we didn't already know it was shit and not indicative of the actual strength of these teams

I don't like best of 1, but there are more than 30 teams, so the format is acceptable for a Lock in

SamBR [#17]

I don't like best of 1, but there are more than 30 teams, so the format is acceptable for a Lock in

i wanted to see best of 5 at least with one game

Ziro [#14]

good since we can meme the ones who lose, but we cannot judge teams because one bad match.

Yeah right, all the threads about the losing teams mostly tells them to disband lol

SamBR [#17]

I don't like best of 1, but there are more than 30 teams, so the format is acceptable for a Lock in

I think you meant single elim, because the matches so far have been Bo3.

Dybala21 [#19]

Yeah right, all the threads about the losing teams mostly tells them to disband lol

vlr forum sometimes is fun than watching the game itself

vollizie [#20]

I think you meant single elim, because the matches so far have been Bo3.

YEAH