100T VS ENVY
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.31 1.20 1.42 | 241 233 250 | 23 11 12 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 2 4 | +8 +2 +6 | 86% 93% 79% | 157 161 154 | 18% 22% 15% | 4 4 0 | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | |
![]() |
1.30 1.16 1.43 | 214 194 235 | 21 9 12 | / 13 9 4 / | 14 6 8 | +8 0 +8 | 79% 86% 71% | 129 138 121 | 23% 27% 19% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
![]() |
1.08 1.16 0.99 | 229 266 192 | 22 12 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 0 0 0 | +5 +3 +2 | 64% 57% 71% | 147 188 107 | 19% 23% 14% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
1.08 1.12 1.03 | 212 255 169 | 21 12 9 | / 17 9 8 / | 6 4 2 | +4 +3 +1 | 68% 71% 64% | 137 166 108 | 18% 14% 29% | 4 1 3 | 3 3 0 | +1 -2 +3 | |
![]() |
0.91 0.52 1.31 | 224 163 287 | 20 8 12 | / 22 13 9 / | 9 3 6 | -2 -5 +3 | 79% 79% 79% | 159 121 198 | 17% 22% 14% | 2 0 2 | 6 3 3 | -4 -3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.05 0.61 1.50 | 187 120 255 | 19 5 14 | / 19 10 9 / | 4 2 2 | 0 -5 +5 | 64% 57% 71% | 124 88 159 | 17% 18% 17% | 1 0 1 | 4 4 0 | -3 -4 +1 | |
![]() |
1.05 1.19 0.91 | 245 277 214 | 23 13 10 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 0 3 | +1 +2 -1 | 68% 64% 71% | 153 166 141 | 21% 19% 24% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
![]() |
0.83 0.52 1.13 | 190 152 230 | 20 7 13 | / 22 12 10 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -5 +3 | 50% 43% 57% | 116 101 131 | 18% 12% 21% | 5 4 1 | 3 0 3 | +2 +4 -2 | |
![]() |
0.69 0.53 0.84 | 133 76 190 | 12 6 6 | / 20 10 10 / | 11 5 6 | -8 -4 -4 | 43% 36% 50% | 75 43 106 | 29% 45% 22% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
![]() |
0.58 0.70 0.47 | 132 138 128 | 10 5 5 | / 24 12 12 / | 6 4 2 | -14 -7 -7 | 50% 50% 50% | 96 108 85 | 25% 23% 28% | 3 0 3 | 3 1 2 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() ![]() |
1.31 1.35 1.33 | 225 209 242 | 76 36 40 | / 55 28 27 / | 50 25 25 | +21 +8 +13 | 79% 82% 76% | 144 143 146 | 29% 29% 28% | 4 3 1 | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
![]() |
1.37 1.06 1.21 | 238 267 210 | 84 50 34 | / 66 33 33 / | 29 18 11 | +18 +17 +1 | 78% 88% 68% | 146 163 130 | 18% 19% 17% | 11 11 0 | 5 1 4 | +6 +10 -4 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.97 0.97 0.97 | 244 229 259 | 74 41 33 | / 80 39 41 / | 35 13 22 | -6 +2 -8 | 77% 80% 74% | 168 167 170 | 23% 31% 17% | 15 7 8 | 20 9 11 | -5 -2 -3 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
1.14 0.73 0.93 | 176 198 159 | 62 37 25 | / 62 27 35 / | 16 9 7 | 0 +10 -10 | 71% 80% 62% | 115 143 89 | 21% 22% 19% | 5 1 4 | 12 5 7 | -7 -4 -3 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.89 0.89 0.89 | 185 189 184 | 66 33 33 | / 70 34 36 / | 20 14 6 | -4 -1 -3 | 64% 67% 60% | 120 130 110 | 17% 14% 22% | 10 3 7 | 13 7 6 | -3 -4 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() ![]() |
1.20 1.05 1.13 | 241 239 242 | 80 41 39 | / 70 31 39 / | 29 17 12 | +10 +10 0 | 71% 72% 69% | 147 148 145 | 19% 16% 22% | 17 12 5 | 7 1 6 | +10 +11 -1 | |
![]() ![]() |
1.04 1.08 1.06 | 221 198 243 | 76 35 41 | / 72 31 41 / | 21 9 12 | +4 +4 0 | 75% 78% 71% | 145 132 158 | 19% 19% 19% | 15 8 7 | 9 7 2 | +6 +1 +5 | |
![]() |
0.92 0.93 0.93 | 185 166 202 | 64 31 33 | / 73 34 39 / | 15 7 8 | -9 -3 -6 | 65% 60% 69% | 128 120 135 | 26% 30% 23% | 7 0 7 | 6 1 5 | +1 -1 +2 | |
![]() |
1.14 0.62 0.89 | 195 227 166 | 63 42 21 | / 75 34 41 / | 26 12 14 | -12 +8 -20 | 71% 78% 63% | 136 155 116 | 13% 15% 10% | 9 5 4 | 9 4 5 | 0 +1 -1 | |
![]() ![]() |
0.72 0.81 0.76 | 155 120 188 | 50 24 26 | / 72 35 37 / | 39 26 13 | -22 -11 -11 | 63% 68% 57% | 92 77 107 | 23% 20% 25% | 6 5 1 | 14 7 7 | -8 -2 -6 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.46 1.33 1.58 | 254 219 289 | 21 9 12 | / 15 7 8 / | 12 8 4 | +6 +2 +4 | 88% 92% 83% | 169 157 181 | 31% 42% 20% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
![]() |
1.11 1.41 0.81 | 265 332 199 | 21 14 7 | / 20 9 11 / | 6 3 3 | +1 +5 -4 | 79% 92% 67% | 191 241 140 | 32% 41% 22% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
![]() |
0.78 0.85 0.71 | 219 252 186 | 18 10 8 | / 22 11 11 / | 9 6 3 | -4 -1 -3 | 71% 83% 58% | 135 161 109 | 18% 17% 19% | 3 3 0 | 3 0 3 | 0 +3 -3 | |
![]() |
0.77 1.19 0.35 | 160 192 129 | 13 9 4 | / 18 7 11 / | 6 3 3 | -5 +2 -7 | 71% 92% 50% | 114 142 87 | 21% 25% 18% | 1 0 1 | 6 3 3 | -5 -3 -2 | |
![]() |
0.64 0.88 0.40 | 136 172 102 | 14 9 5 | / 20 9 11 / | 4 3 1 | -6 0 -6 | 58% 67% 50% | 88 126 50 | 21% 23% 18% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.35 1.60 1.11 | 304 285 324 | 22 12 10 | / 17 6 11 / | 13 8 5 | +5 +6 -1 | 83% 83% 83% | 193 179 208 | 23% 19% 30% | 5 4 1 | 2 0 2 | +3 +4 -1 | |
![]() |
1.33 1.15 1.51 | 251 205 298 | 24 11 13 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 1 2 | +7 +3 +4 | 79% 58% 100% | 168 128 209 | 23% 28% 19% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
1.10 1.15 1.06 | 235 203 269 | 18 8 10 | / 17 6 11 / | 8 5 3 | +1 +2 -1 | 88% 100% 75% | 173 143 202 | 24% 27% 22% | 7 3 4 | 0 0 0 | +7 +3 +4 | |
![]() |
0.98 1.12 0.83 | 192 186 200 | 14 8 6 | / 17 8 9 / | 15 12 3 | -3 0 -3 | 79% 100% 58% | 121 132 110 | 25% 19% 30% | 2 2 0 | 2 0 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
![]() |
0.88 1.28 0.49 | 198 224 172 | 17 13 4 | / 19 8 11 / | 6 3 3 | -2 +5 -7 | 83% 92% 75% | 131 157 106 | 12% 20% 3% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.37 1.87 0.90 | 246 327 173 | 19 14 5 | / 15 6 9 / | 8 5 3 | +4 +8 -4 | 83% 91% 75% | 153 181 128 | 18% 16% 22% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
![]() |
1.36 1.70 1.06 | 216 248 188 | 19 11 8 | / 13 5 8 / | 12 6 6 | +6 +6 0 | 83% 91% 75% | 148 158 140 | 35% 28% 48% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
1.10 1.13 1.07 | 189 184 195 | 16 9 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 3 1 2 | +2 +3 -1 | 83% 91% 75% | 115 134 97 | 27% 18% 35% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
0.91 1.00 0.83 | 237 202 270 | 16 10 6 | / 18 9 9 / | 8 2 6 | -2 +1 -3 | 83% 91% 75% | 151 160 143 | 15% 22% 9% | 5 4 1 | 7 3 4 | -2 +1 -3 | |
![]() |
0.68 0.33 1.00 | 170 91 244 | 13 3 10 | / 18 8 10 / | 3 1 2 | -5 -5 0 | 52% 64% 42% | 105 57 148 | 12% 13% 11% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.16 1.49 0.80 | 273 282 266 | 21 12 9 | / 19 7 12 / | 6 2 4 | +2 +5 -3 | 74% 83% 64% | 180 194 166 | 19% 22% 16% | 5 3 2 | 3 1 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
![]() |
1.03 1.52 0.50 | 209 294 118 | 15 12 3 | / 16 7 9 / | 11 6 5 | -1 +5 -6 | 70% 83% 55% | 145 196 89 | 5% 5% 4% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
![]() |
1.00 1.06 0.94 | 192 178 208 | 16 8 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 7 6 1 | 0 +1 -1 | 70% 75% 64% | 114 99 130 | 15% 13% 16% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
![]() |
0.75 0.79 0.71 | 182 150 218 | 15 7 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 8 6 2 | -2 -1 -1 | 70% 75% 64% | 95 87 104 | 22% 21% 23% | 3 3 0 | 6 3 3 | -3 0 -3 | |
![]() |
0.69 0.54 0.86 | 114 98 133 | 11 5 6 | / 15 7 8 / | 2 0 2 | -4 -2 -2 | 65% 50% 82% | 84 73 96 | 21% 25% 17% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.39 1.62 1.16 | 246 268 224 | 24 15 9 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 5 1 | +10 +8 +2 | 71% 83% 58% | 138 152 123 | 17% 23% 11% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
![]() |
1.21 1.13 1.30 | 217 179 255 | 15 7 8 | / 14 7 7 / | 12 5 7 | +1 0 +1 | 67% 58% 75% | 134 123 145 | 23% 18% 27% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
1.14 1.16 1.12 | 220 218 223 | 18 9 9 | / 15 8 7 / | 7 6 1 | +3 +1 +2 | 75% 67% 83% | 146 158 135 | 19% 6% 36% | 3 1 2 | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.95 1.03 0.88 | 251 228 276 | 17 9 8 | / 20 8 12 / | 12 5 7 | -3 +1 -4 | 67% 58% 75% | 173 153 193 | 26% 35% 21% | 7 2 5 | 3 2 1 | +4 0 +4 | |
![]() |
0.77 1.06 0.49 | 127 138 117 | 11 7 4 | / 13 5 8 / | 7 5 2 | -2 +2 -4 | 67% 83% 50% | 80 100 61 | 14% 19% 7% | 0 0 0 | 3 1 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1.38 1.75 1.02 | 279 356 203 | 22 14 8 | / 15 6 9 / | 6 2 4 | +7 +8 -1 | 83% 92% 75% | 168 223 113 | 19% 17% 24% | 4 3 1 | 2 1 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
![]() |
1.15 1.34 0.96 | 241 228 256 | 19 10 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 4 2 2 | +2 +3 -1 | 67% 83% 50% | 165 174 156 | 33% 42% 28% | 3 0 3 | 2 0 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
![]() |
0.94 1.00 0.87 | 189 199 181 | 18 10 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 3 0 3 | +1 +2 -1 | 75% 75% 75% | 108 109 107 | 16% 8% 29% | 2 2 0 | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | |
![]() |
0.65 0.46 0.84 | 112 76 148 | 9 3 6 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 3 2 | -9 -6 -3 | 63% 67% 58% | 81 53 109 | 16% 6% 22% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
![]() |
0.55 0.59 0.51 | 126 104 149 | 8 4 4 | / 18 8 10 / | 6 3 3 | -10 -4 -6 | 63% 75% 50% | 111 101 120 | 15% 23% 8% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
greedeetv [#1]100T VS ENVY
Ya that makes the most sense but you really never know. Gonna be a really interesting challengers
greedeetv [#1]100T VS ENVY
Honestly looking like a 100T vs XSET to me right now but I will still stand by my original prediction
BIGGEST_LG_FAN [#11]is there map adv. for 100t? cuz if not the format is ass
the advantage is playing 1 fewer series and not getting eliminated.
greedeetv [#6]Honestly looking like a 100T vs XSET to me right now but I will still stand by my original prediction
You called it
100t 3-1 against Xset if there is map advantage and 100t start with 1 then map 2 will be bind 12-14 xset icebox 13-6 100t ascent 13-10 100t and 100t 3-1 but if 100t don’t get a free map it’ll be icebox 13-6 for 100t bind 12-14 xset 13-10 ascent for 100t and haven 13-5 100t.
These are just my predictions don’t hate pls
MontyPython75 [#2]Ya that makes the most sense but you really never know. Gonna be a really interesting challengers
Yeah, nobody knows how anything will turn out but its gonna be interesting. Thanks for the heads up!
The_IroN_xD [#10]I think it will be a 3-2 100t vs nv, but i could be wrong
Oh you surely can be wrong when trying to guess what will happen
s1r14n [#28]rly? go school to again.
When you tell a person to go back to school, make sure you have perfect grammar at least in that post
FireII [#18]my prediction would be based off what maps we saw, like if the first three maps were like ascent, bind, haven, I might have to 100t a 3-0, but also I can see xset getting any of those. coming back to this post once we know the picks tomorrow!
Gonna be very hard to wait for your prediction. Very interesting
Scottyboi30 [#19]100t 3-1 against Xset if there is map advantage and 100t start with 1 then map 2 will be bind 12-14 xset icebox 13-6 100t ascent 13-10 100t and 100t 3-1 but if 100t don’t get a free map it’ll be icebox 13-6 for 100t bind 12-14 xset 13-10 ascent for 100t and haven 13-5 100t.
These are just my predictions don’t hate pls
We wont hate, we will just laugh
array [#26]Editing wrong predictions lmao
dude why are you so annoying youre literally replying to every wrong prediction with "HAHAHA YEAH YOU COULD BE WRONG WHEN U TRY TO GUESS" as if it matters and tryna sound smart when you didnt even make predictions for people to clown you on
plas [#33]dude why are you so annoying youre literally replying to every wrong prediction with "HAHAHA YEAH YOU COULD BE WRONG WHEN U TRY TO GUESS" as if it matters and tryna sound smart when you didnt even make predictions for people to clown you on
Oh. Were you annoyed? Sorry, that was not my intention
raka_gg [#21]Daaamn NSG, back at it again with the meaningless best of 5 games 🤢
Imagine thinking nsg have anything to do with format. What nsg is definitely responsible for and is really good at is inviting cringy ass casters
array [#35]Imagine thinking nsg have anything to do with format. What nsg is definitely responsible for and is really good at is inviting cringy ass casters
name better casters lmao, i'll wait
array [#30]When you tell a person to go back to school, make sure you have perfect grammar at least in that post
Damn, you humiliated him xD
array [#35]Imagine thinking nsg have anything to do with format. What nsg is definitely responsible for and is really good at is inviting cringy ass casters
Don't care + didn't ask
raka_gg [#39]Don't care + didn't ask
Oh yeah? Well I didnt care nor asked what you think about bo5. Ha. What now?
array [#35]Imagine thinking nsg have anything to do with format. What nsg is definitely responsible for and is really good at is inviting cringy ass casters
There is a young caster duo in val, upmind and sully I think. I don't know if they get chance in cs at such early age. But, they are very very good, most of the older pals are nowhere near them. Hope they cast finals.They are quick with words,but yeah casters are not to that level in val yet.
Caliburn0723 [#47]There is a young caster duo in val, upmind and sully I think. I don't know if they get chance in cs at such early age. But, they are very very good, most of the older pals are nowhere near them. Hope they cast finals.They are quick with words,but yeah casters are not to that level in val yet.
I'll try to take notice when they cast. Did they do any matches in some masters tourney? You picked my interest, Id like to check them lol
array [#48]I'll try to take notice when they cast. Did they do any matches in some masters tourney? You picked my interest, Id like to check them lol
i will tell you a quick way to identiy them, the one with the orange afro is upmind
plas [#33]dude why are you so annoying youre literally replying to every wrong prediction with "HAHAHA YEAH YOU COULD BE WRONG WHEN U TRY TO GUESS" as if it matters and tryna sound smart when you didnt even make predictions for people to clown you on
I love you plas <3
greedeetv [#6]Honestly looking like a 100T vs XSET to me right now but I will still stand by my original prediction
Xset loses 1-3, but might win on the off chance that PureR wins more first engagements than 100T Asuna. Or if Hiko baits enough :3
Cheasle2 [#12]the advantage is playing 1 fewer series and not getting eliminated.
What Cheasle2 means is NO. Also in the Stage 1 Masters 1 just a little while ago, SEN got no map advantage in the tournament. Seems unfair, but that's what it is.
BluWasTaken [#16]ayo, this is a new matchup
First time going up against each other, wonder if Xset can pull something out of the bag...
array [#48]I'll try to take notice when they cast. Did they do any matches in some masters tourney? You picked my interest, Id like to check them lol
I'm not trying to be a dick here, but it's piqued or peaked, not picked.
FordTom [#62]Split and icebox are your first 2 maps going 1-1, then 100T takes the rest of it 3-1
100t have map veto and As far as ik they get to choose first 3 maps with side preference in 1&3. I hope I listened to it correctly
array [#41]Oh yeah? Well I didnt care nor asked what you think about bo5. Ha. What now?
And I wasn't replying to you about that
I was posting a general comment where I have a freedom of speech
MioIsTheProblem [#61]Hoping for an interesting, close game.
Watching a 3-0 wipe is not enjoyable.
it is, if you’re a 100t fan 😀
STRAWHAT [#13]XSET vs 100T
3-1 100T GG
serious question. when someone says 3-1 100T, does it mean 100T will win 3-1, or lose 3-1?
yes im a noob help me pls
greedeetv [#60]I'm not trying to be a dick here, but it's piqued or peaked, not picked.
Well. Thanks for correcting. Somehow never saw that idiom written
dadiiznobozzy [#68]serious question. when someone says 3-1 100T, does it mean 100T will win 3-1, or lose 3-1?
yes im a noob help me pls
means 100T will win 3-1
raka_gg [#64]And I wasn't replying to you about that
I was posting a general comment where I have a freedom of speech
Why so butthurt? You know... you are in a forum after all where people respond to one another.
100T 3-0 XSET
I know my prediction is a bit late but it is still only the first half and my prediction is looking even worse at the time of writing (100T 3-6 XSET).
I think that 100T will win easily on icebox because them and gaze seem to just have that map on lock and ascent is also their pick so I presume they both have that on lock and also because they have not had hard matches they probably have been sandbagging strats. They probably then have enough momentum to carry this form into map 3 (split). That’s why I predict a 3-0. If they lose one of those 3 maps then I still predict a 100T win 3-1 bcos they can defo beat XSET on haven.
Tbh the only way XSET can win this is if they have some very good individual performances from the likes of PureRe
Edit: Btw the bit I changed were the maps Bcos I forgot what the last map was
Error404 [#86]100T 3-0 XSET
I know my prediction is a bit late but it is still only the first half and my prediction is looking even worse at the time of writing (100T 3-6 XSET).
I think that 100T will win easily on icebox because them and gaze seem to just have that map on lock and ascent is also their pick so I presume they both have that on lock and also because they have not had hard matches they probably have been sandbagging strats. They probably then have enough momentum to carry this form into map 3 (split). That’s why I predict a 3-0. If they lose one of those 3 maps then I still predict a 100T win 3-1 bcos they can defo beat XSET on haven.
Tbh the only way XSET can win this is if they have some very good individual performances from the likes of PureRe
Edit: Btw the bit I changed were the maps Bcos I forgot what the last map was
Sheesh icebox was a bit too close
swaglord69 [#93]ok... idk if this is true but i remember bjor saying that the nanoswarm that steel just didi on the first pistotl round (ascent) is not allowed causeenemy cant see or shoot it
under heaven nano?
swaglord69 [#93]ok... idk if this is true but i remember bjor saying that the nanoswarm that steel just didi on the first pistotl round (ascent) is not allowed causeenemy cant see or shoot it
It isn't allowed in EU but its fine in NA
itsmedavidjones [#3]C9 vs NV
imma c9 fan soo... i had to :)
Why is everyone downvoting your comment XD
Error404 [#90]Sheesh icebox was a bit too close
Nvm think it might be a 3-2
XSET win split but 100T win haven and bind
Awesome comp from xset, especially on ascent where at least i thought viper was pretty bad. Imo what they have here is gonna become meta after teams are actually playing with buffed viper. Running no sentinel is super possible when you have viper and astra as they can stop act as rush stoppers, and if you add in sage as well, you have a super powerful offense and defense. It only then makes sense to finish the comp with the 2 best overall agents, raze and sova but I'm sure other versions will be run too, maybe skye in there over sova or sage and since it's NA, I don't doubt teams will want jett or phoenix somewhere as well
xd_mau5 [#37]Damn, you humiliated him xD
And still you dont understand that 3-1 is a valid result for a BO5 Match
s1r14n [#113]And still you dont understand that 3-1 is a valid result for a BO5 Match
ofc i know, but saying XSET take 3-1 over 100T
OMEGALUL
array [#23]Yeah, nobody knows how anything will turn out but its gonna be interesting. Thanks for the heads up!
why are you getting downvoted, do ppl on vlr just randomly choose what replies to downvote or something
Error404 [#99]Nvm think it might be a 3-2
XSET win split but 100T win haven and bind
every game was so close :(
xd_mau5 [#119]ofc i know, but saying XSET take 3-1 over 100T
OMEGALUL
The comment literally says ‘3-1 100T GG’, what’re you on about lol. OP predicted 100T to win? OMEGALUL
SelectiveFucksGiven [#129]Be honest with me, what do NadeShot's balls taste like?
Be honest with me, what do NadeShot's balls taste like?
SelectiveFucksGiven [#129]Be honest with me, what do NadeShot's balls taste like?
UNICORNS AND FUCKING RAINBOWS BABY
ravissant [#103]Awesome comp from xset, especially on ascent where at least i thought viper was pretty bad. Imo what they have here is gonna become meta after teams are actually playing with buffed viper. Running no sentinel is super possible when you have viper and astra as they can stop act as rush stoppers, and if you add in sage as well, you have a super powerful offense and defense. It only then makes sense to finish the comp with the 2 best overall agents, raze and sova but I'm sure other versions will be run too, maybe skye in there over sova or sage and since it's NA, I don't doubt teams will want jett or phoenix somewhere as well
That comp sounds like more of a EU comp I can’t see NA running that regularly
Hact [#124]why are you getting downvoted, do ppl on vlr just randomly choose what replies to downvote or something
Yeah, I think vlr is just a backwards site where people downvote smart comments
hiyo [#128]well what do you expect from the scummiest matchfixing region of the world. I'm 100% sure they are throwing seeding matches (not for money) just so they dont have to waste energy, very unsportsmanlike.
/s
Mad bettor?
Bobstar [#123]What a fucking game! Xset matched 100T almost every step of the way, 100T pulled out tho. Shout out to BcJ who went 17-7 on first engagements! And ofc I called Asuna for being the factor for 100T's win today.
Oh you called asuna for being a big factor. What a bold and unexpected statement. So smart
hiyo [#128]well what do you expect from the scummiest matchfixing region of the world. I'm 100% sure they are throwing seeding matches (not for money) just so they dont have to waste energy, very unsportsmanlike.
/s
lmao are people ignoring your /s at the bottom and downvoting you ? LMFAOOO
array [#134]Mad bettor?
yes I bet 69 dollar on xset gamin , they throw soooo hard please esic ban thme
/s ofc
Hashtag [#52]I think its gonna either be a very close game 2-1 for 100T or a straight wipe out 2-0 from 100T
best of 5