is v1 playing against the loser of 100t c9 or the loser of the other match?
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.89 1.36 0.61 | 200 201 201 | 13 7 6 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 1 2 | -2 +2 -4 | 74% 86% 67% | 123 136 115 | 26% 35% 19% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.89 0.62 1.05 | 166 80 217 | 9 2 7 | / 14 5 9 / | 7 3 4 | -5 -3 -2 | 68% 71% 67% | 125 52 168 | 20% 29% 18% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.87 0.68 0.97 | 248 225 262 | 14 5 9 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 1 2 | -1 0 -1 | 58% 57% 58% | 146 133 153 | 19% 9% 26% | 3 1 2 | 5 2 3 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.40 1.10 | 188 68 259 | 11 1 10 | / 14 5 9 / | 8 3 5 | -3 -4 +1 | 74% 43% 92% | 113 41 155 | 17% 14% 18% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.53 0.65 0.46 | 190 189 191 | 11 4 7 | / 16 5 11 / | 2 0 2 | -5 -1 -4 | 63% 71% 58% | 121 133 114 | 23% 22% 24% | 0 0 0 | 3 0 3 | -3 0 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.49 1.17 2.05 | 264 235 317 | 18 9 9 | / 11 9 2 / | 7 5 2 | +7 0 +7 | 84% 83% 86% | 136 141 127 | 14% 17% 9% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.38 1.57 1.06 | 249 261 231 | 18 12 6 | / 11 6 5 / | 3 3 0 | +7 +6 +1 | 68% 75% 57% | 160 196 99 | 17% 22% 8% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.05 1.27 0.67 | 130 148 100 | 8 7 1 | / 9 5 4 / | 12 6 6 | -1 +2 -3 | 79% 75% 86% | 95 104 80 | 11% 18% 0% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.03 0.88 1.29 | 212 220 202 | 16 10 6 | / 13 9 4 / | 3 1 2 | +3 +1 +2 | 84% 83% 86% | 116 126 98 | 20% 18% 25% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.01 1.14 0.78 | 216 265 134 | 14 11 3 | / 14 10 4 / | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 | 84% 92% 71% | 138 182 62 | 24% 25% 22% | 6 5 1 | 1 0 1 | +5 +5 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.09 1.08 1.08 | 226 189 265 | 47 21 26 | / 43 16 27 / | 22 8 14 | +4 +5 -1 | 73% 71% 75% | 136 118 154 | 18% 21% 16% | 7 2 5 | 4 2 2 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.16 0.79 0.97 | 219 234 207 | 48 28 20 | / 46 19 27 / | 12 5 7 | +2 +9 -7 | 71% 68% 75% | 136 155 117 | 27% 33% 21% | 3 2 1 | 4 2 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.06 0.75 0.90 | 225 252 201 | 48 26 22 | / 50 23 27 / | 11 6 5 | -2 +3 -5 | 71% 81% 63% | 139 157 120 | 26% 31% 20% | 9 7 2 | 8 5 3 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.01 0.70 0.85 | 162 154 167 | 34 18 16 | / 44 18 26 / | 18 6 12 | -10 0 -10 | 65% 71% 59% | 108 106 110 | 19% 25% 13% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.76 0.91 0.84 | 244 222 267 | 47 23 24 | / 52 23 29 / | 14 6 8 | -5 0 -5 | 70% 74% 66% | 146 140 151 | 20% 17% 22% | 12 4 8 | 12 5 7 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.33 1.15 1.24 | 257 241 270 | 58 31 27 | / 45 24 21 / | 23 12 11 | +13 +7 +6 | 81% 88% 74% | 143 150 136 | 18% 18% 17% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.83 1.30 1.06 | 227 181 276 | 48 20 28 | / 46 24 22 / | 21 13 8 | +2 -4 +6 | 76% 81% 71% | 139 111 167 | 18% 18% 18% | 8 3 5 | 9 6 3 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
1.42 0.68 1.05 | 174 215 140 | 39 29 10 | / 40 17 23 / | 32 16 16 | -1 +12 -13 | 70% 75% 65% | 116 136 95 | 18% 23% 13% | 3 3 0 | 2 1 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.14 0.93 1.04 | 221 252 195 | 50 32 18 | / 49 26 23 / | 9 3 6 | +1 +6 -5 | 81% 94% 68% | 140 160 119 | 24% 22% 28% | 11 7 4 | 7 2 5 | +4 +5 -1 | |
|
1.13 0.65 0.89 | 185 207 161 | 40 24 16 | / 44 20 24 / | 20 14 6 | -4 +4 -8 | 59% 72% 45% | 107 138 75 | 18% 18% 19% | 5 1 4 | 10 6 4 | -5 -5 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.23 0.95 1.60 | 256 178 360 | 17 8 9 | / 13 6 7 / | 8 2 6 | +4 +2 +2 | 81% 83% 78% | 149 109 202 | 17% 23% 13% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.15 0.97 1.38 | 269 260 282 | 20 11 9 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 2 2 | +5 +2 +3 | 76% 83% 67% | 160 153 169 | 28% 31% 24% | 4 3 1 | 3 3 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.12 1.43 0.70 | 200 220 175 | 16 10 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 4 1 3 | +3 +4 -1 | 67% 67% 67% | 118 149 75 | 21% 24% 13% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.97 1.15 0.71 | 228 269 176 | 18 12 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 0 0 0 | +5 +6 -1 | 71% 58% 89% | 138 164 103 | 26% 30% 19% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.93 0.80 1.10 | 246 194 317 | 16 8 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 3 4 | -1 0 -1 | 76% 75% 78% | 149 133 169 | 23% 15% 35% | 6 2 4 | 3 1 2 | +3 +1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.83 0.98 | 311 365 272 | 23 14 9 | / 17 8 9 / | 6 1 5 | +6 +6 0 | 81% 100% 67% | 191 233 160 | 16% 13% 20% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.00 0.77 1.17 | 253 183 305 | 16 6 10 | / 17 8 9 / | 8 4 4 | -1 -2 +1 | 71% 78% 67% | 159 115 192 | 17% 27% 13% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.74 0.56 0.88 | 171 154 185 | 13 6 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 2 1 1 | -5 -3 -2 | 76% 89% 67% | 102 80 119 | 23% 13% 30% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |
|
0.72 0.53 0.87 | 156 181 138 | 12 6 6 | / 18 9 9 / | 7 3 4 | -6 -3 -3 | 57% 56% 58% | 87 87 86 | 21% 27% 17% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.45 0.58 0.36 | 112 134 97 | 7 4 3 | / 17 7 10 / | 5 2 3 | -10 -3 -7 | 43% 56% 33% | 69 92 52 | 26% 25% 27% | 1 0 1 | 4 3 1 | -3 -3 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.15 1.64 0.62 | 233 270 193 | 19 12 7 | / 16 5 11 / | 6 3 3 | +3 +7 -4 | 65% 75% 55% | 144 171 115 | 20% 21% 19% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.05 1.05 1.04 | 228 218 239 | 17 9 8 | / 18 8 10 / | 9 4 5 | -1 +1 -2 | 70% 67% 73% | 144 157 130 | 28% 35% 23% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.98 1.38 0.55 | 216 281 146 | 17 11 6 | / 19 9 10 / | 5 4 1 | -2 +2 -4 | 74% 83% 64% | 134 176 88 | 26% 37% 13% | 5 4 1 | 2 2 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.73 0.77 0.68 | 239 247 232 | 17 10 7 | / 20 10 10 / | 4 2 2 | -3 0 -3 | 74% 83% 64% | 143 151 135 | 18% 24% 13% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.59 0.82 0.33 | 119 132 107 | 9 6 3 | / 17 7 10 / | 7 2 5 | -8 -1 -7 | 61% 75% 45% | 85 94 75 | 14% 24% 5% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.36 2.30 0.50 | 236 315 165 | 19 16 3 | / 13 3 10 / | 13 7 6 | +6 +13 -7 | 74% 91% 58% | 160 211 113 | 20% 24% 14% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.32 1.61 1.06 | 275 316 239 | 23 15 8 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 0 3 | +6 +8 -2 | 83% 100% 67% | 176 203 152 | 25% 22% 29% | 4 2 2 | 2 0 2 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.14 0.83 1.43 | 217 138 290 | 16 4 12 | / 16 7 9 / | 10 8 2 | 0 -3 +3 | 74% 82% 67% | 139 91 183 | 17% 8% 21% | 4 2 2 | 2 2 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.94 1.09 0.80 | 195 146 240 | 17 8 9 | / 17 7 10 / | 10 6 4 | 0 +1 -1 | 78% 82% 75% | 105 91 118 | 24% 33% 18% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.89 1.10 0.71 | 194 207 183 | 15 8 7 | / 16 7 9 / | 12 9 3 | -1 +1 -2 | 65% 82% 50% | 98 113 83 | 15% 8% 25% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 |
xaboff [#1]is v1 playing against the loser of 100t c9 or the loser of the other match?
loser of c9 and 100t
NAValornatPog [#10]relyks is such a baiter, C9 will be better once they drop him
I don't know if you're not watching the games or what's going on, but his role on this team is clearly to lurk. Just look how many times he's on the other side of the map at the beginning of the round. And when he's not, he's always playing with the team and going in with everyone else. Relyks' issue is that he is kind of just bad, not because he is baiting.
greedeetv [#11]I don't know if you're not watching the games or what's going on, but his role on this team is clearly to lurk. Just look how many times he's on the other side of the map at the beginning of the round. And when he's not, he's always playing with the team and going in with everyone else. Relyks' issue is that he is kind of just bad, not because he is baiting.
yeah he missed a good bucky opportunity ON HIS LURK, losing his team the round
NAValornatPog [#10]relyks is such a baiter, C9 will be better once they drop him
relyks is horrible and has some of the worst aim. I though c9 w ere sponsered by aimlabs
plas [#19]dissapointed. the comeback was real until c9 threw hard
now that c9 lost its gonna be impossible for them to make the challengers finals with the better teams that theyre gonna have to face in challengers 2
greedeetv [#11]I don't know if you're not watching the games or what's going on, but his role on this team is clearly to lurk. Just look how many times he's on the other side of the map at the beginning of the round. And when he's not, he's always playing with the team and going in with everyone else. Relyks' issue is that he is kind of just bad, not because he is baiting.
Lurks are useless when it's the same person every time, it becomes super expected. I doubt you know that though.
NAValornatPog [#24]Lurks are useless when it's the same person every time, it becomes super expected. I doubt you know that though.
lurks can mean winning a round or losing a round, a good lurk can be very effective in a round.
NAValornatPog [#24]Lurks are useless when it's the same person every time, it becomes super expected. I doubt you know that though.
Ok just so you don't condescend me again, what's your rank lol? Better be radiant for the way you type. Also, I agree with you, Relyks needs to be dropped, same with mitch, they are a drag on the team. However, you also said he is a baiter, which isn't true. He's lurking and when he's not, he's playing with the team. He's not baiting at all, he's doing what he's supposed to do in that sense. He is just kind of shit.
greedeetv [#26]Ok just so you don't condescend me again, what's your rank lol? Better be radiant for the way you type. Also, I agree with you, Relyks needs to be dropped, same with mitch, they are a drag on the team. However, you also said he is a baiter, which isn't true. He's lurking and when he's not, he's playing with the team. He's not baiting at all, he's doing what he's supposed to do in that sense. He is just kind of shit.
Shahzam had a great clip explaining why Relyks isn't contributing to his team's executes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THPQh3-dv1o
Relyks goes on lurks/flanks and provides 0 team value, and he isn't getting impact frags on them
hiyo [#28]Shahzam had a great clip explaining why Relyks isn't contributing to his team's executes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THPQh3-dv1o
Relyks goes on lurks/flanks and provides 0 team value, and he isn't getting impact frags on them
Not saying lurks = bad, dimasick from FPX does them well but Relyks' lurks just aren't that