is v1 playing against the loser of 100t c9 or the loser of the other match?
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9
|
0
|
4 (0)
|
1 (0)
|
2 (1)
|
12 (5)
|
V1
|
2
|
2 (2)
|
1 (1)
|
6 (3)
|
10 (7)
|
(BANK)
C9
V1
(BANK)
|
1
0.2k
0.3k
|
2
8.2k
$$
3.3k
|
3
0.3k
$$$
$$
11.0k
|
4
8.7k
$$$
$$$
1.2k
|
5
4.5k
$$$
$$
6.4k
|
6
10.7k
$$$
$$$
1.9k
|
7
3.5k
$$
$$$
7.5k
|
8
10.6k
$$$
$$
8.2k
|
9
1.3k
$$$
$$$
13.1k
|
10
8.1k
$
$$$
12.2k
|
11
1.9k
$$$
$$$
19.8k
|
12
0.8k
$$
$$$
15.0k
|
(BANK)
C9
V1
(BANK)
|
13
0.0k
0.3k
|
14
8.5k
$$
2.4k
|
15
1.3k
$$$
$$
8.2k
|
16
15.3k
$$$
$
11.3k
|
17
5.7k
$$$
$$$
7.4k
|
18
19.8k
$$$
$$$
7.7k
|
19
9.8k
$$$
$$$
7.6k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9
|
1
|
3 (2)
|
1 (0)
|
4 (2)
|
13 (9)
|
V1
|
1
|
3 (1)
|
2 (0)
|
4 (1)
|
12 (6)
|
(BANK)
C9
V1
(BANK)
|
1
0.2k
0.0k
|
2
2.7k
$$
7.0k
|
3
16.2k
$$
$$$
0.6k
|
4
4.7k
$$$
$$$
11.9k
|
5
16.5k
$$$
$$$
0.6k
|
6
15.1k
$$$
$
6.8k
|
7
9.8k
$$$
$$$
1.7k
|
8
10.0k
$$
$$$
9.9k
|
9
3.5k
$$$
$$$
12.7k
|
10
8.6k
$$
$$$
14.7k
|
11
13.2k
$$$
$$$
2.6k
|
12
21.8k
$$$
$$
1.4k
|
(BANK)
C9
V1
(BANK)
|
13
0.0k
0.1k
|
14
8.1k
$$
3.1k
|
15
5.1k
$$$
$
8.2k
|
16
12.4k
$$$
$$$
0.8k
|
17
15.9k
$$$
$$
2.6k
|
18
6.2k
$$$
$$$
3.1k
|
19
10.7k
$
$$$
4.2k
|
20
2.7k
$$$
$$$
6.0k
|
21
7.2k
$$$
$$
0.2k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9
|
0
|
4 (0)
|
3 (0)
|
2 (1)
|
14 (9)
|
V1
|
2
|
2 (2)
|
2 (0)
|
8 (4)
|
11 (7)
|
(BANK)
C9
V1
(BANK)
|
1
0.0k
0.3k
|
2
8.6k
$$
0.5k
|
3
0.7k
$$$
$$
11.3k
|
4
6.4k
$$
$$$
1.7k
|
5
18.5k
$$$
$
6.6k
|
6
19.8k
$$$
$$$
3.1k
|
7
8.2k
$$$
$$$
6.7k
|
8
5.8k
$$$
$$
1.6k
|
9
7.6k
$$$
$
6.7k
|
10
10.5k
$$$
$$$
2.4k
|
11
18.2k
$$$
$$
6.3k
|
12
27.3k
$$$
$$$
1.7k
|
(BANK)
C9
V1
(BANK)
|
13
0.0k
0.0k
|
14
7.6k
$$
1.2k
|
15
0.7k
$$
$$
10.3k
|
16
9.1k
$
$$$
7.8k
|
17
0.9k
$$$
$$$
13.1k
|
18
7.1k
$$$
$$
5.7k
|
19
5.1k
$$$
$$
3.3k
|
20
11.0k
$
$$$
4.4k
|
21
0.9k
$$$
$$$
18.3k
|
22
8.1k
$
$$$
23.8k
|
23
2.2k
$$$
$$$
17.7k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C9
|
1
|
11 (2)
|
5 (0)
|
8 (4)
|
39 (23)
|
V1
|
5
|
7 (5)
|
5 (1)
|
18 (8)
|
33 (20)
|
xaboff [#1]is v1 playing against the loser of 100t c9 or the loser of the other match?
loser of c9 and 100t
NAValornatPog [#10]relyks is such a baiter, C9 will be better once they drop him
I don't know if you're not watching the games or what's going on, but his role on this team is clearly to lurk. Just look how many times he's on the other side of the map at the beginning of the round. And when he's not, he's always playing with the team and going in with everyone else. Relyks' issue is that he is kind of just bad, not because he is baiting.
greedeetv [#11]I don't know if you're not watching the games or what's going on, but his role on this team is clearly to lurk. Just look how many times he's on the other side of the map at the beginning of the round. And when he's not, he's always playing with the team and going in with everyone else. Relyks' issue is that he is kind of just bad, not because he is baiting.
yeah he missed a good bucky opportunity ON HIS LURK, losing his team the round
NAValornatPog [#10]relyks is such a baiter, C9 will be better once they drop him
relyks is horrible and has some of the worst aim. I though c9 w ere sponsered by aimlabs
plas [#19]dissapointed. the comeback was real until c9 threw hard
now that c9 lost its gonna be impossible for them to make the challengers finals with the better teams that theyre gonna have to face in challengers 2
greedeetv [#11]I don't know if you're not watching the games or what's going on, but his role on this team is clearly to lurk. Just look how many times he's on the other side of the map at the beginning of the round. And when he's not, he's always playing with the team and going in with everyone else. Relyks' issue is that he is kind of just bad, not because he is baiting.
Lurks are useless when it's the same person every time, it becomes super expected. I doubt you know that though.
NAValornatPog [#24]Lurks are useless when it's the same person every time, it becomes super expected. I doubt you know that though.
lurks can mean winning a round or losing a round, a good lurk can be very effective in a round.
NAValornatPog [#24]Lurks are useless when it's the same person every time, it becomes super expected. I doubt you know that though.
Ok just so you don't condescend me again, what's your rank lol? Better be radiant for the way you type. Also, I agree with you, Relyks needs to be dropped, same with mitch, they are a drag on the team. However, you also said he is a baiter, which isn't true. He's lurking and when he's not, he's playing with the team. He's not baiting at all, he's doing what he's supposed to do in that sense. He is just kind of shit.
greedeetv [#26]Ok just so you don't condescend me again, what's your rank lol? Better be radiant for the way you type. Also, I agree with you, Relyks needs to be dropped, same with mitch, they are a drag on the team. However, you also said he is a baiter, which isn't true. He's lurking and when he's not, he's playing with the team. He's not baiting at all, he's doing what he's supposed to do in that sense. He is just kind of shit.
Shahzam had a great clip explaining why Relyks isn't contributing to his team's executes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THPQh3-dv1o
Relyks goes on lurks/flanks and provides 0 team value, and he isn't getting impact frags on them
hiyo [#28]Shahzam had a great clip explaining why Relyks isn't contributing to his team's executes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THPQh3-dv1o
Relyks goes on lurks/flanks and provides 0 team value, and he isn't getting impact frags on them
Not saying lurks = bad, dimasick from FPX does them well but Relyks' lurks just aren't that