looking like V1 v BBG, going to be one of the MUST WATCHES of this tournament.
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
9
11
-2
|
5
9
-4
|
10
7
+3
|
10
12
-2
|
7
5
+2
|
Zellsis
V1
|
15
10
+5
|
16
7
+9
|
12
11
+1
|
16
12
+4
|
15
11
+4
|
vanity
V1
|
12
7
+5
|
5
12
-7
|
12
8
+4
|
10
11
-1
|
8
9
-1
|
penny
V1
|
11
13
-2
|
11
7
+4
|
12
10
+2
|
11
12
-1
|
9
8
+1
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
9
8
+1
|
12
8
+4
|
9
13
-4
|
12
9
+3
|
7
8
-1
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
1
2
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
vanity
V1
|
4
0
+4
|
2
3
-1
|
5
1
+4
|
0
3
-3
|
|
penny
V1
|
2
1
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
6
1
+5
|
1
5
-4
|
4
0
+4
|
0
2
-2
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
1
|
2
|
effys
V1
|
|
10
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
9
|
1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
13
|
7
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
68
|
1
|
1
|
penny
V1
|
|
9
|
3
|
2
|
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
1
|
vanity
V1
|
|
12
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
52
|
8
|
1
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
8
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
0
|
0
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
11
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
5
|
2
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
8
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
51
|
14
|
0
|
Will
BBG
|
|
10
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
57
|
2
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
50
|
6
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
3
2
+1
|
1
4
-3
|
4
0
+4
|
4
8
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
5
4
+1
|
8
0
+8
|
1
6
-5
|
3
5
-2
|
7
3
+4
|
vanity
V1
|
5
2
+3
|
1
4
-3
|
5
3
+2
|
2
4
-2
|
1
4
-3
|
penny
V1
|
4
4
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
5
-2
|
3
1
+2
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
1
4
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
6
4
+2
|
0
3
-3
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
vanity
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
2
1
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
penny
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
2
Round 6
Critical
Will
Round 15
bjor
Will
|
|
|
|
1
Round 6
Will
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
effys
V1
|
|
4
Round 1
rarkar
Poach
Round 3
Will
Poach
Round 7
Will
rarkar
Round 19
Poach
Critical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
3
|
1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
5
Round 7
bjor
Poach
Round 8
Poach
bjor
Round 10
Critical
Poach
Zellsis
Round 13
Critical
Poach
Round 21
Poach
bjor
|
3
Round 12
bjor
Critical
Will
Round 14
Will
bjor
rarkar
Round 18
bjor
Will
Poach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
1
|
0
|
penny
V1
|
|
2
Round 6
bjor
Poach
Round 15
rarkar
Critical
|
|
1
Round 17
Poach
bjor
rarkar
Critical
|
|
2
Round 8
Critical
Round 17
Critical
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
0
|
1
|
vanity
V1
|
|
1
Round 14
Poach
Critical
|
1
Round 3
rarkar
bjor
Critical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
2
|
0
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
2
Round 21
penny
effys
Round 23
vanity
PLAYER1
|
|
|
|
1
Round 1
effys
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
0
|
0
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
5
Round 1
penny
Zellsis
Round 5
PLAYER1
Zellsis
Round 9
Zellsis
penny
Round 17
vanity
Zellsis
Round 21
PLAYER1
vanity
|
1
Round 2
penny
vanity
PLAYER1
|
|
|
1
Round 21
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
1
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
1
Round 10
vanity
effys
|
|
1
Round 22
PLAYER1
vanity
effys
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
1
Round 10
Zellsis
vanity
effys
|
|
|
33
|
7
|
0
|
Will
BBG
|
|
6
Round 2
effys
Zellsis
Round 5
effys
vanity
Round 6
Zellsis
effys
Round 16
penny
effys
Round 18
vanity
PLAYER1
Round 20
Zellsis
penny
|
3
Round 9
vanity
effys
PLAYER1
Round 12
PLAYER1
effys
penny
Round 23
Zellsis
penny
effys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
1
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
4
Round 4
penny
Zellsis
Round 8
Zellsis
effys
Round 16
PLAYER1
vanity
Round 20
PLAYER1
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
2
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
5
6
-1
|
4
2
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
Zellsis
V1
|
6
2
+4
|
4
3
+1
|
6
2
+4
|
8
5
+3
|
5
4
+1
|
vanity
V1
|
3
4
-1
|
1
3
-2
|
2
3
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
4
3
+1
|
penny
V1
|
1
5
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
4
5
-1
|
4
4
+0
|
2
4
-2
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
6
2
+4
|
7
2
+5
|
4
5
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
0
2
-2
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
4
0
+4
|
1
2
-1
|
|
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
3
Round 4
bjor
Critical
Round 25
bjor
Poach
Round 26
Critical
bjor
|
2
Round 7
bjor
Critical
rarkar
Round 10
rarkar
Poach
Critical
|
1
Round 3
Will
Poach
rarkar
bjor
|
|
2
Round 5
Poach
Round 14
Critical
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
1
|
1
|
effys
V1
|
|
5
Round 5
Will
Critical
Round 11
bjor
rarkar
Round 14
bjor
Poach
Round 15
bjor
rarkar
Round 16
Poach
Critical
|
1
Round 19
Poach
rarkar
Will
effys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
2
|
0
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
5
Round 2
rarkar
Poach
Round 11
Will
Critical
Round 17
rarkar
Will
Round 25
Will
rarkar
Round 26
Poach
Will
|
1
Round 6
rarkar
Will
Poach
|
2
Round 1
Poach
Critical
rarkar
bjor
Round 23
bjor
Poach
Will
Critical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
0
|
0
|
penny
V1
|
|
4
Round 5
bjor
rarkar
Round 8
Critical
bjor
Round 13
rarkar
Poach
Round 15
Will
Poach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
vanity
V1
|
|
3
Round 7
Poach
Will
Round 19
bjor
Critical
Round 24
Will
Poach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
6
|
0
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
1
Round 26
penny
Zellsis
|
1
Round 9
PLAYER1
Zellsis
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
0
|
0
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
4
Round 19
Zellsis
penny
Round 20
Zellsis
vanity
Round 21
PLAYER1
vanity
Round 23
penny
PLAYER1
|
1
Round 17
PLAYER1
effys
penny
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
1
|
1
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
4
Round 4
effys
Zellsis
Round 5
Zellsis
effys
Round 12
PLAYER1
Zellsis
Round 16
vanity
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
6
|
0
|
Will
BBG
|
|
4
Round 18
Zellsis
vanity
Round 19
PLAYER1
vanity
Round 20
penny
PLAYER1
Round 22
Zellsis
penny
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 19
vanity
effys
|
|
|
|
59
|
1
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
4
Round 5
vanity
penny
Round 6
vanity
PLAYER1
Round 14
penny
effys
Round 23
effys
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 23
Zellsis
vanity
effys
|
|
|
54
|
1
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
1
3
-2
|
0
3
-3
|
1
5
-4
|
4
2
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
Zellsis
V1
|
4
4
+0
|
4
4
+0
|
5
3
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
vanity
V1
|
4
1
+3
|
3
5
-2
|
5
2
+3
|
5
3
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
penny
V1
|
6
4
+2
|
5
2
+3
|
5
2
+3
|
4
3
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
2
2
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
2
4
-2
|
3
1
+2
|
4
3
+1
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
vanity
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
|
penny
V1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
Critical
BBG
|
bjor
BBG
|
rarkar
BBG
|
Will
BBG
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
effys
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
vanity
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
penny
V1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLAYER1
V1
|
|
2
Round 15
Poach
bjor
Round 20
Poach
rarkar
|
1
Round 13
Critical
Will
bjor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
1
|
effys
V1
|
|
1
Round 18
Poach
Will
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
4
|
0
|
Zellsis
V1
|
|
3
Round 3
Poach
Critical
Round 9
Critical
bjor
Round 14
Will
bjor
|
3
Round 6
bjor
rarkar
Poach
Round 10
rarkar
bjor
Will
Round 21
Will
rarkar
Critical
|
|
|
|
1
Round 6
rarkar
Poach
|
|
|
|
61
|
0
|
1
|
penny
V1
|
|
3
Round 1
Poach
rarkar
Round 6
Will
Critical
Round 9
rarkar
Will
|
3
Round 4
bjor
Critical
Poach
Round 12
bjor
Will
Critical
Round 16
rarkar
bjor
Critical
|
1
Round 17
Will
Critical
rarkar
Poach
|
|
|
1
Round 4
rarkar
Poach
|
|
|
|
77
|
0
|
0
|
vanity
V1
|
|
8
Round 2
Critical
rarkar
Round 3
bjor
Will
Round 10
Poach
Critical
Round 11
bjor
Will
Round 14
Critical
Poach
Round 15
rarkar
Will
Round 19
rarkar
Will
Round 21
bjor
Poach
|
|
|
|
1
Round 10
Critical
|
1
Round 21
bjor
Poach
|
|
|
|
80
|
0
|
1
|
bjor
BBG
|
|
5
Round 8
Zellsis
vanity
Round 10
PLAYER1
penny
Round 16
effys
PLAYER1
Round 19
PLAYER1
vanity
Round 21
effys
Zellsis
|
1
Round 1
vanity
Zellsis
penny
|
|
|
1
Round 1
penny
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
0
|
0
|
rarkar
BBG
|
|
2
Round 3
Zellsis
effys
Round 19
Zellsis
effys
|
2
Round 4
vanity
PLAYER1
Zellsis
Round 6
effys
penny
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
4
|
0
|
Poach
BBG
|
|
3
Round 6
Zellsis
PLAYER1
Round 7
Zellsis
penny
Round 20
Zellsis
vanity
|
|
|
|
1
Round 16
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
1
|
0
|
Will
BBG
|
|
|
1
Round 20
PLAYER1
effys
Zellsis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
0
|
0
|
Critical
BBG
|
|
2
Round 10
Zellsis
effys
Round 13
vanity
effys
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
3
|
0
|
Swiftmal12 [#3]2-0 V1, BBG can't keep up with T1 teams if they dont anti strat everything
Edit: 2-1 V1
They barely anti-stratted Sentinels, the reason they won was because they played good textbook Valorant and their fundamentals during the game was incredibly solid, and Sentinels looked painfully off-form.
Aster1x [#4]They barely anti-stratted Sentinels, the reason they won was because they played good textbook Valorant and their fundamentals during the game was incredibly solid, and Sentinels looked painfully off-form.
They won because they knew who their ro16 opponent was like 3 weeks before the match happened, because of seeding. They definitely anti-stratted, even though in all honesty there wasn't a lot of stratting from SEN. This is because SEN's only info on BBG is the games they recently played against them (no vods of BBG), so they were left with only breadcrumbs. But yeah, SEN's aim was awful, and the current iteration of their team relies pretty heavily on aim duels.
greedeetv [#6]Ok, that map was pretty rough for V1 and anyone who isn't named "Zellsis" or "Will", but Bind isn't their strongest suit anyways. They'll come back. I still believe.
I agree
Dylxn [#13]No way V1 will lose split, this is wraps, ggs BBG, nexts time dont just study one team
If you watch Poach’s interview he said he they trained for Sentinals just as much as they trained for the other teams in the open qualifier.
Karlfrommathclass [#14]If you watch Poach’s interview he said he they trained for Sentinals just as much as they trained for the other teams in the open qualifier.
isnt that what dig said about how they prepared for TSM? clearly it’s false
Dylxn [#17]isnt that what dig said about how they prepared for TSM? clearly it’s false
That’s some pretty shit logic lol but it is definitely easier to prep for bigger teams. Sentinels has so many vods of theirs out there, meanwhile bbg didn’t play on stream for maybe a month
ideekae [#18]That’s some pretty shit logic lol but it is definitely easier to prep for bigger teams. Sentinels has so many vods of theirs out there, meanwhile bbg didn’t play on stream for maybe a month
yeah bro, i’m not saying fuck bbg, i’m just saying they tunnel visioned on sentinels, and good for them for beating them, but they also needed to review other team ya get me
Dylxn [#19]yeah bro, i’m not saying fuck bbg, i’m just saying they tunnel visioned on sentinels, and good for them for beating them, but they also needed to review other team ya get me
I mean yeah, cuz of the shit seeding you know who your opponent is 3 weeks ahead cuz you know your seeding doesn't change, it's #16, and you know SEN is gonna win masters so like all they gotta do is just study how to beat SEN with TenZ. Also, another big part is that SEN couldn't study BBG back because of lack of vods. Both ways, preparation diff.
greedeetv [#20]I mean yeah, cuz of the shit seeding you know who your opponent is 3 weeks ahead cuz you know your seeding doesn't change, it's #16, and you know SEN is gonna win masters so like all they gotta do is just study how to beat SEN with TenZ. Also, another big part is that SEN couldn't study BBG back because of lack of vods. Both ways, preparation diff.
While certainly , it was mostly preparation diff, it didn't help that almost all of SEN simultaneously had some of the worst individual and team gameplay we've seen in a while.TenZ not getting any kill with his bladestorm first map and just getting a single easy kill in the second map. Sick whiffing few times , along with being unable to hit good shots like he usually does. Dapr for some reason going not going through with his most basic aggressive lurks to try and win rounds. The team lacking in literal fundamentals (which hardly has to do with preparing for the other team) examples being them not setting up the easiest crossfire possible in A in haven despite having numbers advantage and then losing the round due to that. The poach 1v4 which shouldn't have been won at all , but was because Dapr peaked on his own and walked into poach's crosshair , then TenZ instead of double-peeking ,peeking on his own with a sheriff against a phantom especially on a day where he isn't hitting his shots. And then Shahzam trying to take the duel with Poach instead of waiting for Zombs' paranoia to run out and and staying deep in the angle instead of coming out of it and giving poach the fight he needed.
They also had some lucky moments such as in Haven where BBG had absolutely no info on who is C but had info that there's someone in garage in a particular round ,and despite after scouting that A is completely empty , still not hitting the site for... ? some weird reason , Zombs was in A but they missed scouting him , and dapr too , barely , but based on the info they had , they should have hit A , instead of going C , but they hit C anyway .
Another instance being shahzam for some reason staying so far away from Sick's ult instead of being close and protecting it , Rarkar got a free kill on Sick simply due to that , another elementary mistake which has nothing to do with preparing for another team.
BBG on the other hand had some of the best individual gameplay they've ever had as individuals and as a team. There are so many more instances of these kind.
The situation just aligned almost perfectly for BBG to win .
josef [#22]While certainly , it was mostly preparation diff, it didn't help that almost all of SEN simultaneously had some of the worst individual and team gameplay we've seen in a while.TenZ not getting any kill with his bladestorm first map and just getting a single easy kill in the second map. Sick whiffing few times , along with being unable to hit good shots like he usually does. Dapr for some reason going not going through with his most basic aggressive lurks to try and win rounds. The team lacking in literal fundamentals (which hardly has to do with preparing for the other team) examples being them not setting up the easiest crossfire possible in A in haven despite having numbers advantage and then losing the round due to that. The poach 1v4 which shouldn't have been won at all , but was because Dapr peaked on his own and walked into poach's crosshair , then TenZ instead of double-peeking ,peeking on his own with a sheriff against a phantom especially on a day where he isn't hitting his shots. And then Shahzam trying to take the duel with Poach instead of waiting for Zombs' paranoia to run out and and staying deep in the angle instead of coming out of it and giving poach the fight he needed.
They also had some lucky moments such as in Haven where BBG had absolutely no info on who is C but had info that there's someone in garage in a particular round ,and despite after scouting that A is completely empty , still not hitting the site for... ? some weird reason , Zombs was in A but they missed scouting him , and dapr too , barely , but based on the info they had , they should have hit A , instead of going C , but they hit C anyway .
Another instance being shahzam for some reason staying so far away from Sick's ult instead of being close and protecting it , Rarkar got a free kill on Sick simply due to that , another elementary mistake which has nothing to do with preparing for another team.
BBG on the other hand had some of the best individual gameplay they've ever had as individuals and as a team. There are so many more instances of these kind.
The situation just aligned almost perfectly for BBG to win .
Yeah I agree, good reads are hard to do and sometimes it's luck which site you go to. Also, SEN was really bad, but it almost seemed as if they were not trying or saving strats like they've been historically memed to do. I don't actually think they were, but it looked sort of disorganized, and it's kind of on the IGL to sort of rally the troops and keep everyone's head in the game, but it looked like Shaz was off. Lack of effort really, too. If they had treated this game like it was masters finals, and gave 100%, the game definitely would've been closer. In this case, it's almost as if Shaz just said "yeah I don't really have a game plan for this team so let's just do our basic default", and then they lose a bunch of gunfights, and just mental boom and play afraid like it's solo queue.
josef [#22]While certainly , it was mostly preparation diff, it didn't help that almost all of SEN simultaneously had some of the worst individual and team gameplay we've seen in a while.TenZ not getting any kill with his bladestorm first map and just getting a single easy kill in the second map. Sick whiffing few times , along with being unable to hit good shots like he usually does. Dapr for some reason going not going through with his most basic aggressive lurks to try and win rounds. The team lacking in literal fundamentals (which hardly has to do with preparing for the other team) examples being them not setting up the easiest crossfire possible in A in haven despite having numbers advantage and then losing the round due to that. The poach 1v4 which shouldn't have been won at all , but was because Dapr peaked on his own and walked into poach's crosshair , then TenZ instead of double-peeking ,peeking on his own with a sheriff against a phantom especially on a day where he isn't hitting his shots. And then Shahzam trying to take the duel with Poach instead of waiting for Zombs' paranoia to run out and and staying deep in the angle instead of coming out of it and giving poach the fight he needed.
They also had some lucky moments such as in Haven where BBG had absolutely no info on who is C but had info that there's someone in garage in a particular round ,and despite after scouting that A is completely empty , still not hitting the site for... ? some weird reason , Zombs was in A but they missed scouting him , and dapr too , barely , but based on the info they had , they should have hit A , instead of going C , but they hit C anyway .
Another instance being shahzam for some reason staying so far away from Sick's ult instead of being close and protecting it , Rarkar got a free kill on Sick simply due to that , another elementary mistake which has nothing to do with preparing for another team.
BBG on the other hand had some of the best individual gameplay they've ever had as individuals and as a team. There are so many more instances of these kind.
The situation just aligned almost perfectly for BBG to win .
Ur comment is best summarized as this