any thoughts on Soniqs and how well they'll do in NA?
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.96 2.16 1.16 | 291 350 58 | 19 18 1 | / 4 4 0 / | 0 0 0 | +15 +14 +1 | 100% 100% 100% | 190 228 39 | 23% 25% 0% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.54 1.39 2.14 | 292 261 420 | 17 12 5 | / 7 6 1 / | 10 8 2 | +10 +6 +4 | 87% 83% 100% | 140 149 104 | 20% 29% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.36 1.29 1.63 | 262 282 185 | 15 12 3 | / 6 6 0 / | 3 3 0 | +9 +6 +3 | 100% 100% 100% | 155 175 77 | 19% 16% 40% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.06 0.81 2.04 | 212 175 361 | 11 7 4 | / 9 8 1 / | 3 2 1 | +2 -1 +3 | 73% 67% 100% | 110 109 113 | 7% 5% 9% | 4 3 1 | 1 1 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.93 0.90 1.06 | 239 239 240 | 12 10 2 | / 11 9 2 / | 6 3 3 | +1 +1 0 | 87% 83% 100% | 151 160 114 | 14% 15% 9% | 4 3 1 | 2 2 0 | +2 +1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.73 0.72 0.73 | 186 226 177 | 9 2 7 | / 15 3 12 / | 2 1 1 | -6 -1 -5 | 60% 67% 58% | 127 180 114 | 23% 25% 22% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.72 0.04 0.89 | 183 10 227 | 8 0 8 | / 16 3 13 / | 3 0 3 | -8 -3 -5 | 47% 33% 50% | 142 10 176 | 46% 0% 48% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.60 0.02 0.79 | 162 0 203 | 7 0 7 | / 14 3 11 / | 4 1 3 | -7 -3 -4 | 60% 67% 58% | 102 11 124 | 18% 0% 20% | 2 0 2 | 6 2 4 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.43 0.04 0.54 | 130 21 158 | 6 0 6 | / 14 3 11 / | 2 0 2 | -8 -3 -5 | 47% 0% 58% | 85 21 101 | 32% 0% 36% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.43 0.34 0.45 | 133 80 147 | 7 2 5 | / 15 3 12 / | 3 0 3 | -8 -1 -7 | 67% 67% 67% | 70 32 80 | 21% 0% 25% | 2 1 1 | 3 0 3 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.75 0.90 1.38 | 253 303 175 | 32 23 9 | / 18 8 10 / | 18 11 7 | +14 +15 -1 | 89% 90% 87% | 140 186 79 | 30% 43% 10% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.47 1.19 1.35 | 249 251 233 | 34 22 12 | / 18 10 8 / | 4 2 2 | +16 +12 +4 | 80% 90% 67% | 152 168 130 | 17% 22% 9% | 3 2 1 | 5 2 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.58 0.94 1.30 | 256 274 232 | 32 23 9 | / 18 9 9 / | 13 6 7 | +14 +14 0 | 94% 100% 87% | 135 153 111 | 14% 13% 17% | 3 3 0 | 2 0 2 | +1 +3 -2 | |
|
0.89 1.41 1.12 | 220 183 263 | 27 14 13 | / 22 13 9 / | 9 4 5 | +5 +1 +4 | 83% 85% 80% | 131 120 146 | 16% 15% 16% | 6 3 3 | 2 2 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
0.91 0.93 0.92 | 212 187 246 | 26 14 12 | / 25 13 12 / | 5 3 2 | +1 +1 0 | 69% 70% 67% | 117 118 117 | 10% 9% 12% | 7 4 3 | 4 3 1 | +3 +1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 0.57 0.91 | 201 273 164 | 25 16 9 | / 30 10 20 / | 7 2 5 | -5 +6 -11 | 66% 73% 60% | 125 167 94 | 33% 34% 33% | 8 4 4 | 5 1 4 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
0.92 0.80 0.85 | 180 138 211 | 20 7 13 | / 29 9 20 / | 7 3 4 | -9 -2 -7 | 63% 67% 60% | 129 109 143 | 51% 39% 58% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.70 0.77 | 178 185 177 | 21 10 11 | / 29 11 18 / | 7 4 3 | -8 -1 -7 | 54% 67% 45% | 114 116 113 | 19% 18% 19% | 5 3 2 | 9 3 6 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
0.55 0.62 0.59 | 168 149 179 | 19 7 12 | / 33 13 20 / | 7 4 3 | -14 -6 -8 | 63% 67% 60% | 109 100 115 | 28% 33% 26% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.66 0.44 0.53 | 127 132 124 | 16 8 8 | / 30 12 18 / | 3 1 2 | -14 -4 -10 | 49% 53% 45% | 86 92 82 | 33% 31% 36% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.26 2.00 0.77 | 250 261 244 | 17 11 6 | / 12 3 9 / | 10 3 7 | +5 +8 -3 | 90% 100% 83% | 120 121 120 | 10% 8% 13% | 2 2 0 | 2 0 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
1.26 2.28 0.59 | 214 366 114 | 15 11 4 | / 11 2 9 / | 8 3 5 | +4 +9 -5 | 90% 100% 83% | 141 243 73 | 41% 62% 17% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.25 0.88 1.50 | 201 100 269 | 15 4 11 | / 11 4 7 / | 3 1 2 | +4 0 +4 | 80% 88% 75% | 116 59 154 | 17% 13% 18% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.89 0.42 1.20 | 207 104 277 | 15 4 11 | / 14 6 8 / | 4 2 2 | +1 -2 +3 | 65% 75% 58% | 123 78 153 | 10% 10% 10% | 1 0 1 | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.81 1.05 0.65 | 212 206 217 | 15 7 8 | / 16 5 11 / | 2 1 1 | -1 +2 -3 | 65% 75% 58% | 123 130 118 | 13% 12% 14% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.27 1.62 0.75 | 268 321 190 | 18 14 4 | / 15 7 8 / | 4 2 2 | +3 +7 -4 | 65% 75% 50% | 167 201 115 | 39% 38% 41% | 6 3 3 | 2 1 1 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.95 1.14 0.67 | 176 170 188 | 12 7 5 | / 13 6 7 / | 4 3 1 | -1 +1 -2 | 75% 75% 75% | 119 134 95 | 57% 41% 100% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.90 1.11 0.57 | 194 232 139 | 14 10 4 | / 15 8 7 / | 3 3 0 | -1 +2 -3 | 50% 67% 25% | 123 142 95 | 19% 19% 18% | 3 3 0 | 3 1 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
0.60 0.81 0.28 | 124 160 72 | 10 8 2 | / 16 9 7 / | 1 1 0 | -6 -1 -5 | 50% 67% 25% | 87 109 54 | 34% 35% 33% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.49 0.51 0.46 | 150 130 182 | 10 5 5 | / 18 10 8 / | 5 3 2 | -8 -5 -3 | 65% 67% 63% | 95 80 117 | 34% 38% 31% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
charmander12 [#1]any thoughts on Soniqs and how well they'll do in NA?
If everything goes right they should meet Sentinels
dudeeee [#7]theres a chance that they will do well
theres also a chance that they lose to admiralsi hope they do well
it is impossible they lose this series.
wouldn't be surprised if there was a 13-0 map.
kocunar [#2]for sure a top10 team imo, maybe top5, we will see
vlr just updated their standings and now they're 9th in NA
Scottyboi30 [#4]cant wait to see the exo boys do in NA under soniqs its gonna be exciting
There going to be bad wouldnt be suprised if they went out against c9 white
Cheasle2 [#8]it is impossible they lose this series.
wouldn't be surprised if there was a 13-0 map.
I’m just worried how far behind they are tactically, they look like Brazilians with not nearly as good aim or utility usage
Cheasle2 [#8]it is impossible they lose this series.
wouldn't be surprised if there was a 13-0 map.
If they lose before the expected matchup with Sen then OCE has no future
NSG_Observer_2 [#10]There going to be bad wouldnt be suprised if they went out against c9 white
cant wait to see if these words go against you
Scottyboi30 [#13]cant wait to see if these words go against you
Oh great another Australian who overrates below average immortal players
NSG_Observer_2 [#14]Oh great another Australian who overrates below average immortal players
Crunchy already top 100 radiant in NA
Swiftmal12 [#16]bruh its ranked
Are you top 100 radiant in NA after playing ranked for 2 weeks? No? That’s crazy dawg.
Fattest_Lard [#12]If they lose before the expected matchup with Sen then OCE has no future
Why do you say that
Swiftmal12 [#18]Why do you say that
because they will be losing to admirals or c9white
and yes, c9 white beat renegades and eunited but they have no future either
like sure, they can lose to sentinels but if they lose before that, its just australian CS all over again kek
STRAWHAT [#20]Quick 2-0 from the boys over at Soniqs. TOP 10 team
more like a top 50 team c9 white are better
Swiftmal [#11]I’m just worried how far behind they are tactically, they look like Brazilians with not nearly as good aim or utility usage
yeah because admiral are known for their tactical prowess
Swiftmal12 [#18]Why do you say that
Because they were the best OCE team(Order is up there as well) but if they lose this or against C9W than we know that the rest of OCE(again except maybe Order) won't do shit against the teams from other regions but if they lose to Sen, then there's hope for OCE
Swiftmal12 [#29]Ah MB is anyone streaming it?
nah just getting the results posted to a community discord
hilo0829 [#19]because they will be losing to admirals or c9white
and yes, c9 white beat renegades and eunited but they have no future either
like sure, they can lose to sentinels but if they lose before that, its just australian CS all over again kek
13-2 first map. looks like a close game...