NIP 1:2 Acend.
Added Astra
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
268 172 | 22 9 13 | / 15 8 7 / | 2 0 2 | +7 +1 +6 | 164 105 | 43% 40% 46% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
225 142 | 17 7 10 | / 19 8 11 / | 4 1 3 | -2 -1 -1 | 139 84 | 52% 69% 40% | 5 1 4 | 1 2 -1 | +4 -1 +5 | |||
|
215 133 | 16 7 9 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 1 5 | +1 -1 +2 | 137 85 | 29% 20% 36% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
169 84 | 11 5 6 | / 15 9 6 / | 6 2 4 | -4 -4 0 | 113 54 | 29% 33% 25% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
70 65 | 4 0 4 | / 18 8 10 / | 6 2 4 | -14 -8 -6 | 51 48 | 13% 0% 14% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
256 138 | 19 10 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 3 1 2 | +5 +2 +3 | 189 70 | 20% 21% 18% | 4 1 3 | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
228 77 | 18 12 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 7 1 6 | +5 +6 -1 | 128 40 | 34% 33% 36% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
188 141 | 13 3 10 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 1 3 | -3 -6 +3 | 126 91 | 22% 5% 38% | 4 0 4 | 3 1 2 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
186 68 | 18 10 8 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 0 4 | +6 +1 +5 | 115 40 | 29% 21% 46% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
174 76 | 14 7 7 | / 15 10 5 / | 6 5 1 | -1 -3 +2 | 96 41 | 33% 28% 40% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
224 150 | 32 13 19 | / 30 13 17 / | 3 0 3 | +2 0 +2 | 137 89 | 33% 31% 35% | 2 1 1 | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
206 157 | 28 7 21 | / 26 13 13 / | 8 2 6 | +2 -6 +8 | 135 102 | 28% 16% 34% | 3 1 2 | 5 4 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |||
|
193 144 | 26 8 18 | / 34 13 21 / | 6 2 4 | -8 -5 -3 | 123 88 | 44% 63% 37% | 6 1 5 | 2 3 -1 | +4 -2 +6 | |||
|
177 122 | 19 5 14 | / 30 14 16 / | 14 5 9 | -11 -9 -2 | 117 78 | 29% 29% 29% | 4 1 3 | 6 2 4 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
133 94 | 14 4 10 | / 35 13 22 / | 8 3 5 | -21 -9 -12 | 79 64 | 17% 17% 17% | 1 0 1 | 7 2 5 | -6 -2 -4 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
278 93 | 39 24 15 | / 24 16 8 / | 6 5 1 | +15 +8 +7 | 150 45 | 40% 42% 37% | 4 3 1 | 3 1 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |||
|
235 102 | 33 20 13 | / 26 17 9 / | 4 2 2 | +7 +3 +4 | 168 59 | 24% 22% 27% | 8 5 3 | 3 1 2 | +5 +4 +1 | |||
|
225 114 | 30 15 15 | / 24 17 7 / | 5 2 3 | +6 -2 +8 | 139 67 | 35% 30% 41% | 10 3 7 | 4 2 2 | +6 +1 +5 | |||
|
199 77 | 32 18 14 | / 20 15 5 / | 8 2 6 | +12 +3 +9 | 122 45 | 30% 24% 42% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
157 58 | 21 13 8 | / 25 17 8 / | 13 6 7 | -4 -4 0 | 102 31 | 23% 20% 27% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
197 188 | 12 0 12 | / 11 5 6 / | 2 1 1 | +1 -5 +6 | 133 123 | 26% 0% 32% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |||
|
195 131 | 10 4 6 | / 17 5 12 / | 2 1 1 | -7 -1 -6 | 115 85 | 21% 20% 21% | 0 0 0 | 5 0 5 | -5 0 -5 | |||
|
184 170 | 8 0 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 8 3 5 | -7 -5 -2 | 123 110 | 28% 14% 32% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
179 123 | 10 4 6 | / 15 5 10 / | 1 0 1 | -5 -1 -4 | 102 69 | 21% 17% 23% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
160 147 | 9 1 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 2 1 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 102 94 | 33% 33% 33% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
381 114 | 25 17 8 | / 9 6 3 / | 0 0 0 | +16 +11 +5 | 220 51 | 45% 50% 33% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
261 78 | 17 12 5 | / 8 8 0 / | 1 1 0 | +9 +4 +5 | 154 35 | 52% 52% 50% | 6 3 3 | 1 1 0 | +5 +2 +3 | |||
|
213 55 | 14 10 4 | / 12 9 3 / | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | 141 45 | 30% 23% 45% | 4 4 0 | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | |||
|
211 89 | 14 8 6 | / 8 6 2 / | 4 2 2 | +6 +2 +4 | 131 51 | 32% 29% 38% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
85 33 | 3 1 2 | / 12 11 1 / | 6 5 1 | -9 -10 +1 | 67 19 | 7% 0% 18% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
I've changed my mind!
I reckon we see Icebox and Split banned out.
Acend have a better track record on Bind. Their defensive halves are water-tight.
NiP look slightly better on Haven. They've only played it twice this month but haven't lost, pulling above average rwin% on both halves. Acend have played 6 but lost 3, their DEF halves looking strongest.
Ascent is anyone's map. NiP haven't shown a reliable defensive strategy yet but their attack is strong. Acend can defend the hell out of this map but don't look so clean on attack.
For me, the big decider is the team stats. This past month, Acend are just putting out better numbers than NiP. They've played twice as many games, which can't hurt. Their ACS is huge and their avr. K:D is around 1.3. They have a higher ADR and KPR, and they give up less first bloods.
So, seeing as Haven and Ascent are almost too close to call based on their playstyles, I'd have to give the overall advantage to Acend.