OG LDN UTD 1 - 2 G2 🧐
Phoenix, Yoru and KAY/O utility changes
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.50 1.81 1.19 | 288 325 252 | 38 24 14 | / 22 9 13 / | 17 8 9 | +16 +15 +1 | 78% 89% 67% | 182 204 160 | 26% 33% 20% | 3 2 1 | 3 1 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.10 1.58 0.61 | 185 241 129 | 22 14 8 | / 20 6 14 / | 11 9 2 | +2 +8 -6 | 72% 89% 56% | 126 169 84 | 16% 15% 17% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.02 1.02 1.02 | 213 215 211 | 26 12 14 | / 27 13 14 / | 7 4 3 | -1 -1 0 | 69% 67% 72% | 151 154 149 | 26% 23% 28% | 5 3 2 | 6 2 4 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.78 0.73 0.83 | 145 129 163 | 18 8 10 | / 25 11 14 / | 10 6 4 | -7 -3 -4 | 72% 78% 67% | 95 80 109 | 26% 38% 21% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.71 0.94 0.48 | 177 225 130 | 21 15 6 | / 27 14 13 / | 5 2 3 | -6 +1 -7 | 61% 78% 44% | 116 141 91 | 24% 30% 14% | 5 4 1 | 4 2 2 | +1 +2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 1.80 0.94 | 281 357 206 | 37 25 12 | / 24 10 14 / | 4 1 3 | +13 +15 -2 | 67% 78% 56% | 170 219 121 | 21% 24% 15% | 7 4 3 | 8 2 6 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
0.99 1.45 0.53 | 194 255 134 | 22 15 7 | / 24 10 14 / | 7 5 2 | -2 +5 -7 | 64% 72% 56% | 144 190 97 | 25% 23% 29% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.97 0.84 1.09 | 165 120 211 | 19 6 13 | / 22 10 12 / | 17 10 7 | -3 -4 +1 | 72% 72% 72% | 110 87 133 | 17% 12% 21% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.96 1.42 0.49 | 219 282 158 | 26 17 9 | / 28 11 17 / | 11 8 3 | -2 +6 -8 | 64% 78% 50% | 140 182 99 | 25% 29% 18% | 9 6 3 | 5 1 4 | +4 +5 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.51 0.87 | 137 101 173 | 17 6 11 | / 27 12 15 / | 15 8 7 | -10 -6 -4 | 67% 72% 61% | 85 57 113 | 23% 26% 21% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 1.59 1.52 | 306 269 336 | 64 31 33 | / 37 17 20 / | 20 11 9 | +27 +14 +13 | 78% 80% 76% | 188 175 201 | 26% 29% 24% | 7 3 4 | 4 2 2 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.01 1.13 1.07 | 190 193 197 | 39 18 21 | / 38 20 18 / | 17 9 8 | +1 -2 +3 | 68% 63% 72% | 135 133 136 | 27% 23% 30% | 7 4 3 | 8 2 6 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
1.40 0.72 1.06 | 196 238 148 | 40 24 16 | / 35 14 21 / | 16 10 6 | +5 +10 -5 | 76% 83% 69% | 130 163 96 | 23% 23% 24% | 2 2 0 | 4 1 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.63 1.17 0.90 | 150 118 181 | 32 12 20 | / 36 21 15 / | 18 9 9 | -4 -9 +5 | 69% 63% 76% | 102 75 130 | 31% 35% 29% | 3 1 2 | 5 3 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.88 0.58 0.73 | 182 206 154 | 35 22 13 | / 45 23 22 / | 9 2 7 | -10 -1 -9 | 61% 67% 55% | 118 130 106 | 23% 30% 14% | 9 7 2 | 10 5 5 | -1 +2 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.08 1.21 | 237 287 208 | 53 31 22 | / 42 21 21 / | 8 4 4 | +11 +10 +1 | 69% 72% 67% | 152 179 127 | 25% 26% 22% | 10 6 4 | 9 3 6 | +1 +3 -2 | |
|
1.21 0.91 1.06 | 229 253 190 | 42 23 19 | / 41 20 21 / | 13 6 7 | +1 +3 -2 | 66% 69% 63% | 149 177 122 | 23% 21% 26% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.22 0.78 1.00 | 200 246 164 | 38 24 14 | / 44 21 23 / | 27 11 16 | -6 +3 -9 | 64% 69% 60% | 130 156 105 | 24% 31% 16% | 10 7 3 | 5 1 4 | +5 +6 -1 | |
|
0.69 0.99 0.84 | 135 117 166 | 28 11 17 | / 38 20 18 / | 24 10 14 | -10 -9 -1 | 69% 66% 73% | 93 81 105 | 21% 20% 21% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.35 0.92 0.64 | 148 91 198 | 30 9 21 | / 45 22 23 / | 18 9 9 | -15 -13 -2 | 59% 59% 60% | 90 54 124 | 19% 28% 16% | 4 2 2 | 7 3 4 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.56 0.95 2.23 | 323 186 472 | 26 7 19 | / 15 8 7 / | 3 3 0 | +11 -1 +12 | 78% 67% 91% | 196 130 268 | 27% 22% 30% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
1.15 1.00 1.32 | 166 159 175 | 13 6 7 | / 11 7 4 / | 10 5 5 | +2 -1 +3 | 65% 58% 73% | 109 102 116 | 29% 23% 35% | 2 1 1 | 2 0 2 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.08 0.49 1.73 | 154 103 210 | 14 4 10 | / 11 10 1 / | 8 3 5 | +3 -6 +9 | 65% 42% 91% | 113 67 164 | 37% 30% 40% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.01 1.13 0.89 | 206 233 178 | 18 10 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 5 1 4 | +3 +2 +1 | 83% 75% 91% | 135 154 114 | 37% 39% 35% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.76 0.78 0.74 | 186 178 195 | 14 7 7 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 0 4 | -4 -2 -2 | 61% 50% 73% | 122 114 131 | 22% 32% 15% | 4 3 1 | 6 3 3 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 0.83 1.47 | 263 251 275 | 20 8 12 | / 17 10 7 / | 6 1 5 | +3 -2 +5 | 70% 64% 75% | 158 157 159 | 21% 19% 24% | 3 0 3 | 2 1 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.06 0.90 1.21 | 180 188 173 | 12 7 5 | / 16 10 6 / | 16 3 13 | -4 -3 -1 | 65% 55% 75% | 115 115 116 | 23% 38% 14% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.95 0.60 1.28 | 193 173 212 | 16 6 10 | / 18 11 7 / | 4 3 1 | -2 -5 +3 | 74% 64% 83% | 124 113 135 | 38% 36% 40% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.65 0.44 0.84 | 104 110 99 | 9 5 4 | / 16 10 6 / | 7 0 7 | -7 -5 -2 | 65% 55% 75% | 67 72 63 | 29% 33% 23% | 3 3 0 | 2 1 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.56 0.08 1.00 | 159 76 236 | 13 3 10 | / 18 10 8 / | 3 1 2 | -5 -7 +2 | 48% 36% 58% | 97 50 141 | 14% 30% 10% | 2 0 2 | 6 2 4 | -4 -2 -2 |
if Guild got taken to 3 maps by Navi and barely won maps 13-11 against the navi we just watched. This should be 2-0 for OG, Navi has some absolute DOGSHIT players. EU has already surpassed NA in skill but im pretty sure any NA team would demolish garbage Navi. I dont believe Guild will win theres no way
edit: wait GUILD LOST TO NAVI LMAO, THIS IS 100% OG 2-0
How is Yacine a pro player ? Like actually curious I thought that the idea why would someone hire a pro player is because they win you tourney's bringing money and sponsors or they are well recognised. Yacine is neither he plays mainly duelist and is I think the only one who consistently goes sub 200 ACS. Rarely makes an opener and his idea of entering is to raze double satchel into enemy who kills him (and I'm not talking about singular examples).