Yeah, I just want to know what other people think, nothing more. Have a nice day, bro.

okay, i'm sorry

So all teams that will compete in GC must quickly adapt to this so they can survive in the following year, right?

Thank you for coming and giving your opinion, I really appreciate it. Sorry if I misunderstood the information.

That means all GC teams have to adapt quickly to this in order to stay competitive in this event, right? no excuses or complaints whatsoever

Thank you for the information, sorry if I misunderstood

that's what's being discussed here, why should they disrupt a competition with fair and healthy rules and matches in their first year of holding this tournament?

why should they include a maximum of 2 "special players", why not have 1 team consist of 5 of these "special players"?

What do you think?

Please, let me know if I got the information wrong or didn't understand this sentence.

Concurrent Ownership Exception: Organizations operating at the International or Challengers League level will be allowed to field an additional roster within other tiers of the sport if the second roster is composed primarily of Game Changers players.

An organization already fielding a roster in the International Leagues will be allowed to field a Challengers League team, provided 3/5 of the roster are Game Changers eligible.

An organization already fielding a roster in the Challengers Leagues will be allowed to field a second team that competes in Premier or a Challengers League, provided 3/5 of the roster are Game Changers eligible.

in my opinion, why not make them 1 with the existing tier 2 qualification? the premier league is free to contain all genders, right?

this is my opinion, what do you think?

leave it like this or is there anything that needs to be changed?

Let's discuss this case together, no hatred towards each other. This is limited to justice

This is about the existing rules (please tell me if this rule is wrong or does not exist)

In the VCT GC rules it states that the maximum number of "specific gender" players is 2, while they state that this is an open event. Why should this maximum rule be given? Why don't they accept 5 "specific gender" players in one team? By giving this maximum standard for "specific gender" players, it means that they realize that there is a gap between men and women.

In my opinion and my suggestion, for teams that have "specific gender" players, a separate tournament should be created below tier 3 which can later be promoted to tier 2 and so on, even tier 1 if possible. And create an event that is specifically for players who were born female. It's sad to see these women who have worked hard and trained, while later on they encounter things like this.

What do you think? Separate events for each gender or keep it like this.

God bless you