bili bili hasn't performed well against top teams of their region this year. (edg or fpx) 100t and KC at least has at some point this year, even going to masters and showing promise, but they don't even get to compete for qualification against bilibili...

please look at bilibili match history

honestly i wanted to see 100t on champs (or at least get bundle money since i think they deserve it), hence the yapping, hence the name; ofc im biased but im trying to make a point

having no good stage shouldn't either??? i honestly don't think thats fair at all, they should at least compete against each other

kc still could deserve it against other lower teams of apac or bilibili, im not saying they do for sure but im saying they should at least have a chance to show whether or not they are better

A set number of champions slots per region (4) makes it so 1 team per region qualify based off of yearly performance (champions points) and so regions with better teams are under-represented and regions with worse teams are over-represented. What this means is that teams who didn't qualify for any masters the whole year or at least won enough games in stage1 and 2 to collect champions points like talon, trace, and bilibili qualify for champs and get the huge bundle bonus (1.25m per team last year) by JUST qualifying meanwhile teams like 100t who dominated their region in stage 1 and got decent results in one masters and overall racked up a lot of champions points, and KC who qualified for one masters therefore did well in one stage and got more champs points, get absolutely nothing for that just because their regions have more good teams. There should be a way to make champs qualification more fair and for best teams in the world who deserve the money, not set slots for representation from regions, but equal opportunity to qualify for each region.