W

Dick

yes. thats how it should be.

,, otherwise it is nothing like a franchising anymore "

thats the whole point, it shouldnt be franchising at all, if it were up to me id make an open circuit like in cs, but its obvious that since riot want to franchise the scene they wont back off, and so im trying to offer a solution that fucks the scene in the ass as less as possible and at the same time meets riots demands

make pro leagues for each region, pro leagues lead to masters
lets take emea pro league for example
there will be 16 teams
8 are partner orgs
8 come trough open qualifier
that way riot satisfies their fetish with franchising and we still have fluid competition where u dont have to be part of a shit org in order to make it big

I am calling it from now, competitive Valorant will die if Riot goes full franchise. Part of what gives soul to an esports is that everyone can make a team and qualify to big events if they are good enough. Franchising takes that away, completely kills the soul of competition by turning the scene from a place that values hard team work and coordonation to a place where the pro scene will be full of baiters that farm their stats into being noticed by an org. Full franchising is not the way and mark my words when i say that if riot goes trough with this Valorant will die.

Csgo died outside of Europe because valve never really cared about increasing the games popularity, for them cs is just a money printer.
Riot always keeps the slots fair at master and champion events for every region and that encourages competition. Im not against some orgs being named partners but imo full franchising is a step towards killing the game.
Best way to do it: lets say there are 16 teams at the emea pro league which leads to masters. 8 of these teams are partner orgs, the other 8 come from qualifiers

,,more stability"
Thats exactly what kills an esport, taking out the chance of tier2 teams to compete with the elite because only certain partner teams have direct slots to tournaments.
Basically you are turning the pro scene from a place that values coordonation and hard work as a team to a place where the only way to make it is if ur an opportunistic stat farmer and get lucky being noticed.

Yes, football is the best out of all the sports, but even the best sport is nothing in terms of entertainment compared to esports.
As for my attention span, yes, i have adhd, cant control that, but it doesnt change the fact that sports are more popular simply because they are older then esports. Entertainment wise any popular esport > the goat game of sports

Because esports is more entertaining then sports
Imagine watching 90 mins of football for example where its just 5 minutes max of entertaining goals and 85 minutes of people running around like donkeys
Contrary to any esports where every round ( exception being most eco rounds) is entertaining and theres constant action

not even, faceit level 10 is like top 100k, radiant is top 500. So radiant= 3k elo at least

Because in cs spray matters more than taps, in valorant its the opposite,bursting matters

U like spray simulator go to cs u like burst simulator play valorant very simple

xDDDDD

No worries this time they will win

Thats correct wp

Youll never guess mine so ill give you a hint- hes currently not on a team

Nice

1. Because no matter what you say there is always going to be someone who disagrees or feels offended of what you said,and caring about how my words affect other people is to much of an effort for me.
2. If i am talking to a woman and she tells me to refer to her as that instead of female, of course i would do that. Thats not what im against,what im against is radicals or beta males who act like the word ,,female" should be banned from usage entirely. If you want to be called in a certain way its whatever, but no one has any right to tell me what words to use when im not having a conversation with them and im simply using a general scientific term such as ,,females"
   ,,but the word ,,female" is offensive to women"
   No one has any right to speak for an entire gender, the word female is offensive to you and if i would be talking to you i would respect that but since im not,i dont have to.
3. I dont have to be someone in order to say that people who think everyone should stop saying a scientific term because they dont like it are stupid. This world is a battleground of opinions and i dont care enough about other people in order to say to myself ,,i shouldnt say this because it might offend others" .
4. What do you mean that im deciding for them? Since when have have women collectively come together and decided the word ,,female " is offensive? Because from what i see,its mostly men who complain about this word, and women who feel offended by this word are a minority to those who dont or dont care how you adress them.

,,No use arguing here"
Easiest way to say you have no arguments
,,These people still watch ben shapiro"
Making assumptions about me, nice
,,and call people who respect women simps"
What does respecting women mean to you,because if someone would tell me the word male is offensive, i would call him an idiot, does that mean i dont respect males?
If respecting women means changing my vocabulary because some limited group of people managed to convince an entire zombie horde that a scientific term is somehow sexist, then you are right, i dont respect women, and i dont respect anyone.
But then again thats not what respecting women means to me. To me that means showing a person of the female gender the exact same human decency i would show to anyone else, which i am doing.

the fact that the only way people can counter what i said is with idiotic phrases like ,,who asked" or ,,cringe" shows that i am right. If they truly wouldnt care, they wouldnt reply to me and let my thread die, but the fact they did reply shows that to a limited extent at least, they care, but they have no arguments against me so they rely on the sheep tactic of spamming ,,who asked" , because thats the only thing a sheep can do

it took me 5 minutes to write this thread. I dont see how thats me caring about something in an excessive way. I made this thread because i want to have a discussion about a certain topic, not because i care that someone called me an incel. I simply used that as a way to begin the conversation about what i truly wanted to talk about

can work, but then again i dont see why a word with no offensive meaning should be considered offensive and why it should be avoided just because a limited group of females feels offended when you call them that. Like am i supposed to care about every restricted group of people who takes a simple word and makes it sound so deep and discriminatory? No im not.

so i saw this thread: https://www.vlr.gg/96801/females-in-valorant
and the first comment is someone saying to the thread poster to use the word ,,woman" instead of ,,female" ,then i proceeded to explain why i use this word ( its due to the fact that when i talk about a female my age (17) it feels weird refering to her as a woman, especially since in my country at least people use the word woman to describe full grown females, like if you talk about a 16-19 yo female and refer to her as a woman, people will look at you like a pedo, so therefore the term ,,female" is more inclusive and easier to use).

and then just because i used the word ,,female" ,some idiot called me an incel. Like holy shit, i get that there will always be stupid people in this world but when i see people who genuinly believe ,,female" is an offensive term,i cant help but look at them and ask myself ,,what is wrong with these people? how can someone have a rational capacity set so low that they believe a scientific term used for so many years is now offensive just because some radicals on twitter decided so? the brain of this people,what is it filled with,fucking air?"

if i talk directly to a female and she tells me to refer to her as a woman,if that female is 20+ yo i have no problem doing that,but its truly hilarious in a very sad way that theres so many white knight males telling other males how ALL females should be reffered to.

,,b-but the word ,,female" is offensive because it is objectifying people down to their genitalia"
if you truly believe this, not only you are a cuck, but you also have a very low iq. Imagine if someone said the term ,,male" in a random way like ,,alpha male" and some random person started explaining why the word male is offensive because it objectifies people down to their genitalia xDDDD . Fucking idiots.

No it doesnt,if im talking about a female my age (17) it feels so weird calling her a woman.Female is more inclusive and the people who think this word is offensive are braindead

W

Whats wrong with instalocking?I always instalock sova or kayo depending on the map because i dont care about what others want to play and im not gonna play something i dont want just for the sake of filling,if you dont like people instalocking fade instalock her faster

The easy utlity usage doesnt make the game easier,it makes it harder.You have to think 7 times before standing in a corner because depending on the enemy comp u can get flashed,naded,revealed,stunned,etc.Cs utlity is so hard to use that the entire game is pretty much just aim simulator and the strategical ceiling is nowhere close to that of valorant
More utility = harder strategy

The more utility there is and the easier it is to use=the harder positioning,coordination and strategy is
Csgo frogs downfragging me because im right and their egos are to fragile to be able to understand their game isnt superior to other games 🥱

Lol just because cs has higher ceiling on certain mechanics doesnt mean its a harder game,valorant has a 10 times higher ceiling then cs when it comes to positioning,team coordonation and overall strategy.Stop comparing valorant by cs standards and go educate yourself by looking at my ,,CSGO is NOT harder than valorant" post

Every single day theres a new thread on HLTV shit talking valorant so why not return the favor?

And i proved why that point is shit in my thread,but of course csgo fans would rather live in their braindead bubble then understand the truth

yeah

I am talking about playing the game profesionally, not ranked. Csgo requires much less strategy and team coordination then valorant, which makes the experience you have in a faceit game much more similar to one you would have playing in a tournament of your league with an actual team. In valorant that is nowhere near the case, ranked valorant and professional valorant are 2 completely different games, which is why most valorant pros dont even play ranked. Same can be said about some cs pros i know but in comparison there are way more cs pros who play faceit then there are valorant pros who play ranked ,and so therefore that proves you cant compare the difficulty of those games by your experience in ranked, because valorant esports is way harder compared to valorant ranked than csgo esports is compared to csgo ranked.

I agree,the point of my post was to prove that there is no harder game between the two and each have different things you need to be good at. And altough this might sound obvious at first i think there are some people especially on HLTV that should read what i said and wake up from the overdose of copium which gave them the mentality ,,csgo harder game,valorant noob game,valorant never going to compete with cs because valorant child game".

I would have apologised for taking your name if your account was older than mine but it isnt

,,every iron player in valorant can smoke off entraces to a site perfectly within seconds"
So what? Once again rellying on the same argument that easier mechanics=easier game.Thats just not true because the easier the utility usage is,the harder it will be for you to predict how enemies are going to use their utlity and therefore positioning is way harder and more punishable in valorant

I see so many people on HLTV act like csgo is somehow harder than valorant,but its just not.The main arguments i see that are being used are the fact that valorant has slower movement then cs(therefore making hitting your shots easier) and easier utility usage (since cs has only 5 pieces of utility,compared to valorant which has a fuckton).But this logic relies on the argument that easier mechanics=easier game,which is a completely flawed way of thinking.Just because its easier to use utility in valorant,doesnt make the entire game easier,because this advantage doesnt only apply to you,it also applies to your enemies.Therefore,because of valorants countless ways of being creative in terms of utility usage you have to be 10 times more aware of things such as positioning,because there are countless ways the enemies can kill you without even having to face you.Sure that also can be said about cs but still if you are in a bad position in a csgo game its nowhere near as punishable as it is in a valorant game.Having an easier time using utlity=having a harder time positioning yourself in a productive way,and having a harder time predicting what your enemies are going to do.Same can be said about valorants slower movement,you are not the only one having an easier time hitting shots,your enemies have the same advantage and therefore therefore it doesnt make the game easier compared to cs,it just means those 2 games have similar mechanics distributed in a different way.And the final argument i see thats being used,is that the valorant pro scene is made up of washed up cs pros.Now where do i begin with this one,first of all Valorant is a new game and its completely logical that its playerbase consists of csgo,apex,fortnite players.There is no ,,original valorant player" because if someone never touched an fps game until valorant came out its impossible to go from being clueless about fps's to pro in just 2 years.And if we stay and look at all the csgo pros who switched to valorant,most of them failed to stay relevant in the scene.Some of them never came close to being good in valorant(happy,skadoodle,dazed,swag,floppy,autimatic) ,others were good at the beginning of the game but once the scene started to develop and other teams started catching up they fell from tier 1 and altough they are still good they are nowhere near the best (sentinels squad,scream,jamppi,zellsis,wippie) and others managed to become way more relevant in valorant then they ever were in cs(boaster,fns,victor,ange1,nukkye) .The point is,its completely normal for the valorant scene to be made of pros of ex something,cause its impossible to go from knowing nothing to mastery in just 2 years,so its obvious those that have experiences of games similar to valorant will have an advantage to those who dont,especially if we are talking about pros here.So being good at cs is not a guarantee you will be good in valorant,because csgo is not a harder game than valorant is,both games have their own mechanics distributed in completely different ways so when it comes to playing professionally,there is no harder game.